Re: PGP

2001-10-29 Thread Roman Neuhauser
> Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:04:51 -0600 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PGP > From: "Stephen E. Hargrove" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > i'm trying to get mutt working with GnuPGP. mutt.org states: > > Go to the contrib subdirectory of the source tree. You'll find > three files there, pgp2.rc, pgp

Re: Why no new stable-branch version?

2001-10-29 Thread Russell Hoover
On Sun 10/28/01 at 02:59 AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So when the development branch gets all fixed up real nice-like, they'll > make it 1.4.0. I don't want to be prescriptive, by any means, because I'm not a developer, but it would seem that the overall project run

Re: Why no new stable-branch version?

2001-10-29 Thread Russell Hoover
On Sun 10/28/01 at 08:47 AM -0800, Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if Russell is thinking of something more akin to the FreeBSD > development cycle where there are two branches: [snip] > However, I don't know if Mutt or the Mutt community is large enough to > warrant this s

Re: default: no such color

2001-10-29 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Mon, 29 Oct 2001, Jonathan Perkin wrote: > Aye, actually had time to investigate this over the weekend and found > the offending stuff in mutt's configure script - for the use_default_color > checks it only includes curses.h - now on NetBSD this only exists in > /usr/include for system curses

Re: New Mail / Lists

2001-10-29 Thread Steven G. Harms
So far all the solutions I saw proposed on this were designed to acommodate local mboxen. What if you're IMAPpin' it ? steven ' On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 04:32:54PM -0500, shock wrote: >I'm having two problems. First, when I bring up a listing of mail folders, I'd like >to see some indication o

list of aliases in .muttrc

2001-10-29 Thread Stefan Antoni
I defined some aliases in my .muttrc . Last time i used mutt, i hit some(?) keys and mutt displayed a list of my aliases like: 1. lars 2. nin 3. ... This overview is a nice thing when i forget an alias, but i didn't recognize how i invoked it and i didn't find anything in the manual about it.

Re: list of aliases in .muttrc

2001-10-29 Thread Lance Simmons
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 08:23:02PM -0500, Stefan Antoni wrote: > > This overview is a nice thing when i forget an alias, > but i didn't recognize how i invoked it and i didn't > find anything in the manual about it. When mutt prompts you for the To: address, hit tab. Lance Simmons

Re: neato PGP/push thing... almost

2001-10-29 Thread Volker Moell
Hi, mutt-users! (I lost the original posting, so excuse the lost reference.) A week ago Justin asked how to check automatically traditional signed/crypted mails. He had the problem that mutt seems to go into an endless loop. I tried to figure it out and I got the same results, even with Thomas'

Re: neato PGP/push thing... almost

2001-10-29 Thread Justin R. Miller
Thus spake Volker Moell ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Anyone there who solved the problem? I did try this some more, and I believe I came to the conclusion that the message-hook took place upon highlighting the message in the index, even before viewing it, and that mutt would cycle endlessly for some r

Re: Why no new stable-branch version?

2001-10-29 Thread Brendan Cully
On Sunday, 28 October 2001 at 04:48, Russell Hoover wrote: > It has now been -- to the day -- exactly one year and three months since > a stable-branch, general-release version of mutt has appeared. > > While the developer-branch continues to evolve (and is now at version > 1.3.23i), the stable b

Re: Why no new stable-branch version?

2001-10-29 Thread Petr Hlustik
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 05:21:42PM -0500, Brendan Cully wrote: > On Sunday, 28 October 2001 at 04:48, Russell Hoover wrote: > > > > It just seems to me that the longer it goes on, the more difficult it will > > be for stable-branch users to make the change-over to a mutt-1.4.0 or > > whatever, as

Re: Spam problem

2001-10-29 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 01:35:16AM -0500, Justin R. Miller (dis)graced my inbox with: > Thus spake Rob 'Feztaa' Park ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > Hey guys, I've been having this terrible problem with email spam and I > > was wondering if you guys have similar problems, and if so, what you do > > ab

Re: Why no new stable-branch version?

2001-10-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Brendan Cully [29/10/01 17:21 -0500]: > only has one "maintainer". Backporting fixes makes twice the work (or [...] > If you can convince Alan Cox to maintain the stable branch of mutt, I'm > sure we'd all welcome him :) Some of the debian people, otherwise - they are great at backporting ;)

Re: unable to post to AOL

2001-10-29 Thread Matej Cepl
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:24:28PM -, Rob Park wrote: > > I have now. I don't know how I existed so long without it. > > It is unset by default and the ONLY problems I had posting > > before yesterday were with AOL. > That's weird. I just looked through my .muttrc and it wasn't > there, so it

Re: unable to post to AOL

2001-10-29 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:24:24PM -0500, Matej Cepl (dis)graced my inbox with: > On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 11:24:28PM -, Rob Park wrote: > > > I have now. I don't know how I existed so long without it. > > > It is unset by default and the ONLY problems I had posting > > > before yesterday were

OT: not able to set textwidth to 65

2001-10-29 Thread Matej Cepl
Hi, trying to set textwidth in my $EDITOR (i.e., vim 6.0) to 65, but even though I have following in my ~/.vimrc, it is always initially set to 78, when starting vim as a message editor (well, when started as ANY editor for that matter). set tabstop=3 set shiftwidth=3 set noexpandtab if has("a

Re: OT: not able to set textwidth to 65

2001-10-29 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Matej Cepl [30/10/01 01:20 -0500]: > Is anybody able to help me (sorry, for OT question, but I guess > that there are many vim users on this list), please? Try this # Use mutt.editor as our editor set editor="vim +':set textwidth=65' +':set wrap' +\`awk '/^$/ {print i+2; exit} {i++}' %s\` %s"