I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
:%!gpg -eas
Unfortunately, all headers (including "to") are signed, effectively
making these headers useless. Is there a way to specify to this filter
only to sign/encrypt the actual message body?
--
Frederik Vanrenterghem
Hi,
it seems like the mailinglist is not accepting mail when I use the
standard from address (since I'm subscribed with an address specifically
for this list). Currently I just change the from-address, but I'm
wondering why the list is set up this way. A lot of people don't
subscribe to every mai
Frederik --
...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said...
% Hi,
%
% it seems like the mailinglist is not accepting mail when I use the
Yep.
% standard from address (since I'm subscribed with an address specifically
% for this list). Currently I just change the from-address, but I'm
You can use a sen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [01/10/01 11:47 +0200]:
> I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
> :%!gpg -eas
Instead, use
macro compose S "Fgpg -a --clearsign -u 0xEDEDEFB9"
and when you have hit :wq and come back to mutt (and are supposed to hit "y"
for the mail to go out),
On (30/09/01 14:33), Benjamin Smith wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2001 at 10:14:19PM -0400, Matej Cepl wrote:
> > Maybe, that I am asking too much, but my experience with mutt is
> > that everything is possible -- one just has to know, what to put
> > in .muttrc. So,
> >
> > would it be possible to hi
The only thing this patch does is to fix a compilation problem. If
you successfully built and installed 1.3.22 (as it seems you did),
there's no need to upgrade to 1.3.22.1.
On 2001-10-01 12:33:44 +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:33:44 +0800
>From: Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTE
When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
or an overlook ?
--
André Majorel http://www.teaser.fr/~amajorel/>
(Not speaking for my employer, etc.)
Hi,
I'm trying to build mutt from sources to include the pgp_outlook_compat
patch. This works fine, the problem is that the compressed folder
support is not included.
I've traced the problem to a call of autoheader in the makefile. After
`./configure --enable-compressed` the file config.h cont
Hi,
it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
apply the patch
http://mutt.kiev.ua/download/mutt-1.3.22.1/patch-1.3.22.1.vvv.nntp.gz to
Viktor --
...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said...
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I'm trying to build mutt from sources to include the pgp_outlook_compat
% patch. This works fine, the problem is that the compressed folder
% support is not included.
Forgive me for aasking such a basic question, but did you ap
Hi,
I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
Error sending message, child exited 1 ().
What does this mean?
Thanks,
Philipp
On Sun, Sep 30, 2001 at 18:23:40PM +0200, Rene Clerc wrote:
> You could put the following in your .muttrc:
> folder-hook "push \"l~N\n\""
> and probably extend it to show old messages to (i have mark_old
> unset).
Yes!!!
folder-hook ^nntp "push ' ~N'"
folder-hook . "push ' '"
seem to make a t
I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
:%!gpg -eas
Unfortunately, all headers (including "to") are signed, effectively
making these headers useless. Is there a way to specify to this filter
only to sign/encrypt the actual message body?
--
Frederik Vanrenterghem
David T-G [01/10/01 06:17 -0400]:
> % Hi,
> % standard from address (since I'm subscribed with an address specifically
> % for this list). Currently I just change the from-address, but I'm
> You can use a send-hook for that to make things easier, BTW :-)
Also, set envelope_from
-suresh
Hi,
it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
apply the patch
http://mutt.kiev.ua/download/mutt-1.3.22.1/patch-1.3.22.1.vvv.nntp.gz to
Frederik,
On Monday, 1 October 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
> newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
> user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
> apply the patch
> http
David T-G wrote:
> Viktor --
>
> ...and then Viktor Rosenfeld said...
> % Hi,
>
> Hello!
>
>
> %
> % I'm trying to build mutt from sources to include the pgp_outlook_compat
> % patch. This works fine, the problem is that the compressed folder
> % support is not included.
>
> Forgive me for
On Monday, 01.10.2001 at 17:19 +0200, Viktor Rosenfeld wrote:
> ...
> Yes, the patch is included in the Debian source distribution and is
> correctly applied. `mutt -v` gives me (among other things) -COMPRESSED,
> which wouldn't be there, if there was no compressed-folder patch.
Shouldn't it be
* Viktor Rosenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [01-10-2001 17:22]:
| Yes, the patch is included in the Debian source distribution and is
| correctly applied. `mutt -v` gives me (among other things) -COMPRESSED,
| which wouldn't be there, if there was no compressed-folder patch.
Perhaps a very stupid qu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Philipp Boksberger [01/10/01 00:52 +0200]:
> I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
> now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
> Error sending message, child exited 1 ().
> What does
Thus spake Andre Majorel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc e),
> the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate or an
> overlook ?
Yeah, I've noticed that with both mbox and IMAP setups in Mutt.
--
| Justin R. Miller / [EMAIL PR
On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
> :%!gpg -eas
>
> Unfortunately, all headers (including "to") are signed, effectively
> making these headers useless. Is there
There was a thread on the gnupg maillist about this last week. Off the top
of my head it involved signing/encrypting with multiple recipients, this
allows 'any' of the recipients to verify/decrypt on their own. I'd think
you could add a command to do what you want.
DAve
http://lists.gnup
On (01/10/01 00:12), Mat?j Cepl wrote:
> seem to make a trick. Thanks a lot. I am now really persuaded
> that mutt is able to do everything (except for that buttered
> bread, I know)! And help on this list is really terrific. Thanks
> again.
And for your next trick, you can learn to send message
Okay,
it appears that the compressed-folder patch supplied with Debian doesn't
do what it's supposed to do. Somehow it messes up source configuration.
Anyway, copying the actuall patch by rr to debian/patches solved my
problems. Now I finally have compressed-folder support and
outlook-compati
>From the keyboard of Frederik,
> Hi,
>
> it seems there are a few possibilities to enable mutt to read
> newsgroups, but these require patching the source. Since I'm a Debian
> user, I'd like to be able to make a .deb from the patched version. If I
> apply the patch
> http://mutt.kiev.ua/downlo
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 09:01:34PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Philipp Boksberger [01/10/01 00:52 +0200]:
> > I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
> > now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
> > Erro
Philipp Boksberger wrote:
> I intalled mutt and exim some days ago ane everything worked fine. But
> now I have problems in sending mails. I get the following error-message:
>
> Error sending message, child exited 1 ().
what do your mail logs say it means?
w
--
GPG Public Key:
http://in
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 03:37:42PM +0200, Andre Majorel wrote:
> When I send a new message using an older one as a template (esc
> e), the new message is not saved to $record. Is that deliberate
> or an overlook ?
It's deliberate. Search the archives this discussion has been had
several times.
On Tue, 25 Sep 2001 at 06:20:33 +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
[snip mutt and leafnode not working]
> I think the problem is leafnode related, as mutt works perfectly on my
> ISP's news server.
>
> Version info:
> Mutt 1.3.22.1i (2001-08-30)
> Leafnode+ NNTP Daemon, version 2.14
>
> Any
On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote:
> On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> "Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying out some ways to clear text sign a message in mutt, using
> > :%!gpg -eas
> >
> > Unfortunately, all headers (including
thanks for the great one-liner, piet ... that is why i read these lists
aloha,
dave
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
> On Mon, 01 Oct 2001 at 11:19:43 -0500, David Champion wrote:
> > On 2001.10.01, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "Frederik Vanrenterghem" <[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:20:49AM +0200, Piet Delport wrote:
> You can do it a bit more elegantly[1] with this ex one-liner:
>
> 1;/^$/+1,$!gpg --clearsign
Back in the old days days of PGP 2.x, someone pointed out that you can
use a couple of macros to handle common PGP operations within vi.
U
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 02:55:48PM +0200 or thereabouts, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> The only thing this patch does is to fix a compilation problem. If
> you successfully built and installed 1.3.22 (as it seems you did),
> there's no need to upgrade to 1.3.22.1.
>
so it means that my copy of 1.3.
34 matches
Mail list logo
