The only thing this patch does is to fix a compilation problem. If
you successfully built and installed 1.3.22 (as it seems you did),
there's no need to upgrade to 1.3.22.1.
On 2001-10-01 12:33:44 +0800, Rino Mardo wrote:
>Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2001 12:33:44 +0800
>From: Rino Mardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: strange 1.3.22 to 1.3.22.1 compile problem
>Mail-Followup-To: Mutt Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
>
>hi. i'm trying to apply the diff file for 1.3.22 to 1.3.22.1 and i find
>it strange how it works.
>
>first, i have to run "./configure" before i can apply the patch.
>
>second, after applying the patch i have to somehow create a file name
>"README.UPGRADE" as the compilation is looking for that file. without
>it the compile will fail.
>
>third, after step two i keep getting this error messages in the "po/"
>directory:
>
>PATH=../src:$PATH : --default-domain=mutt --directory=.. \
> --directory=.. --add-comments --keyword=_ --keyword=N_ \
> --files-from=./POTFILES.in \
>&& test ! -f mutt.po \
> || ( rm -f ./mutt.pot \
> && mv mutt.po ./mutt.pot )
> file=./`echo uk | sed 's,.*/,,'`.gmo \
> && rm -f $file && PATH=../src:$PATH -o $file uk.po
> /bin/sh: -o: command not found
> make[2]: *** [uk.gmo] Error 127
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/root/backup/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.22/po'
> make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory
> `/root/backup/mail/mutt/mutt-1.3.22'
> make: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
>
>although this missing files are present before i run make.
>
>i wouldn't normally have problems compiling if i don't apply the patch.
>i hate to download the whole mutt-1.3.22 tarball again as i'm on a slow
>dial-up line. is there anything i can fix to make the patch compile?
>
>--
>"GUIs normally make it simple to accomplish simple actions and impossible
>to accomplish complex actions." --Doug Gwyn (22/Jun/91 in comp.unix.wizards)
--
Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
PGP signature