Re: muttrc

On (29/08/01 19:43), Christoph Maurer wrote: > Am Mit, 29 Aug 2001, schrieb Ailbhe Leamy: > > > OK, I may be being stupid, but mutt seems to recognise ~/.muttrc > > _and_ ~/.mutt/muttrc > > Of course, if the manpage does know... where? > > > It is explicitly said in the mutt user manual, section

Re: muttrc

Am Don, 30 Aug 2001, schrieb Ailbhe Leamy: > On (29/08/01 19:43), Christoph Maurer wrote: > > > Am Mit, 29 Aug 2001, schrieb Ailbhe Leamy: > > > > > OK, I may be being stupid, but mutt seems to recognise ~/.muttrc > > > _and_ ~/.mutt/muttrc > > > > Of course, if the manpage does know... where?

Re: automatically prepend the '=' (default location) to mailbox input

Eric -- ...and then Eric Smith said... % How can I configure mutt to implicitly prepend the '=' or '+' to a % user specified mailbox like in . Do you mean that, if you go to save this message, you get Save to mailbox ('?' for list): davidtg-muttusers instead of Save to mailbox ('?' for li

RMAIL

Hi all! I accidently started rmail in Emacs. It took my whole spool file, and dumped into a file called RMAIL in my home dir. The format looks pretty close to mbox, but yet not exactly. There are no from lines, and instead it has something similar to this before each message: ^_^L 0, unseen,, **

Re: RMAIL

Jesper Holmberg [30/08/01 12:04 +0200]: > I accidently started rmail in Emacs. It took my whole spool file, and > dumped into a file called RMAIL in my home dir. The format looks pretty > close to mbox, but yet not exactly. There are no from lines, and instead > it has something similar to this b

Re: RMAIL

* Jesper Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [08/30/01 12:04]: > I accidently started rmail in Emacs. It took my whole spool file, and > dumped into a file called RMAIL in my home dir. The format looks pretty > close to mbox, but yet not exactly. There are no from lines, and instead > it has something si

query_command handling of '%s' vs. %s

Hi! When setting set query_command="~/bin/mutt-email '%s'" and searching for two words, e.g. "foo bar", it my $query_command got two args "foo" and "bar", not the single one "foo bar". When I see "command '%s'" I think that the single quotes will use only one argument (including the space). O

query_command handling of '%s' vs. %s

Hi, there! When setting set query_command="~/bin/mutt-email '%s'" and searching for two words, e.g. "foo bar", it my $query_command got two args "foo" and "bar", not the single one "foo bar". When I see "command '%s'" I think that the single quotes will use only one argument (including the spa

Re: muttrc

On 2001-08-30 10:43:02 +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote: >Ah. Thank you. I find stuff stored in /usr/doc so much less >conveneitn than stuff in manpages that I forgot it was there. I've fixed in the man page. -- Thomas Roesslerhttp://log.does-not-exist.org/

Re: muttrc

On (30/08/01 14:55), Thomas Roessler wrote: > On 2001-08-30 10:43:02 +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote: > > >Ah. Thank you. I find stuff stored in /usr/doc so much less > >conveneitn than stuff in manpages that I forgot it was there. > > I've fixed in the man page. Now *that's* service. Thanks. Ailbhe

No record of mails (on fcc-hook) when mailbox is not valid

Hi, there! When specifying the fcc-hook: fcc-hook 'foo' "+x/y/z" without having a folder x/y/, mutt displays an error message which I can't read, and then at once the "Mail sent.". I even can't read the 'message when increasing the $sleep_time. But not the not-readable error message is the

equivalent to ucbmail's "alternate" in Mutt?

In the old UCB mail program, I can have an "alternates" line in my .mailrc file, which tells the mailer that I have several different names, and won't add them to the cc list when replying to a message. So if I am [EMAIL PROTECTED], and I have an alternate [EMAIL PROTECTED], and get this message:

Re: equivalent to ucbmail's "alternate" in Mutt?

Thus spake Guy Middleton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > In the old UCB mail program, I can have an "alternates" line in my > .mailrc file Try the "alternates" entry at: http://mutt.org/doc/manual/manual-6.html#variables -- | Justin R. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Of all the thi

Re: equivalent to ucbmail's "alternate" in Mutt?

hello, On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 04:13:24PM, Guy Middleton wrote: > > Then a reply will go only to [EMAIL PROTECTED], not to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Is there something equivalent in Mutt? In your .muttrc set metoo and it can be usefull to set set followup_to=no too > ---end quot

Re: muttrc

On 2001-08-30 15:27:08 +0100, Ailbhe Leamy wrote: >Now *that's* service. Thanks. >"but all free software is so unreliable!" "Shyeah. Right." Hey, I can also be horribly slow in applying patches and fixing things. You were just lucky. :-> -- Thomas Roesslerhttp://log

Re: Stripping out signatures, etc.

I have try this script but I always get error in end file line 45:syntax error : unexpected end of file. Thanks. On Tue 27/08/2001 at 04:10PM -0400, Jean-Sebastien Morisset wrote: > A while back, someone asked how to strip out signatures, etc. I posted a > little script which I've since improved

Mutt/GnuPG guide that I have written

Hi, I've just completed what I think will be my first cut at a relatively quick guide to using GnuPG with Mutt easily and responsibly. Please feel free to check it out and to give me feedback so that I can improve it before releasing it to the world at large. You may find it at: http:/

Re: Mutt/GnuPG guide that I have written

On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 09:27:36PM -0400, Justin R. Miller wrote: > Hi, > > I've just completed what I think will be my first cut at a relatively > quick guide to using GnuPG with Mutt easily and responsibly. Please > feel free to check it out and to give me feedback so that I can improve > it b