Re: Mutt under Win2k

Hi! I would like to get mutt running on my notebook and M$ Windows. I've looked at the www.cygwin.com homepage but could not make out that mutt is supported by cygwin. Where do I get the source or binary of mutt for cygwin? BTW: cygwin is new for me and not yet installed on my notebook. What too

Re: Mutt under Win2k

Just run the Cygwin setup (the link is on the Cygwin page). You'll get the binary. You need to select source if you want the source. You'll end up with mutt (and a bunch of other useful stuff). Todd * Daniel Kollar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010321 07:35]: > Hi! > > I would like to get mutt running

folder-hooks dont work

Hi! To have different Return-Paths set in my headers, in different folders I set up the following: folder-hook {imaphost}myfolder 'my_hdr Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' When I hit m to compose a mail, it seems as it would work. With header editing enabled I can see the Return-Path is set c

Re: folder-hooks dont work

Christoph proclaimed on mutt-users that: > To have different Return-Paths set in my headers, in different > folders I set up the following: > folder-hook {imaphost}myfolder 'my_hdr Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' No damned use this way. You set the envelope (and hence the return path) us

Re: folder-hooks dont work

On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:56:27PM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: > > > folder-hook {imaphost}myfolder 'my_hdr Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>' > > No damned use this way. You set the envelope (and hence the return path) > using the set sendmail option in older mutts and the set envel

Re: Mutt: Reading POP3 mail and moving the messages to folders based on To: and Cc: headers, before the messages are read.

Does anyone know how to put an "if" construct inside one of these macros? You see, if there aren't any tagged messages (after you apply, say, ~C mutt-users) then the sequence just saves the current message, probably to the wrong folder. - Original Message - From: "Duke Normandin" <[E

script for forwarding to spamcop.net?

Does anyone have a script for forwarding mail from mutt to spamcop.net? If so, how do you use it? Lance Simmons

Re: Mutt: Reading POP3 mail and moving the messages to folders based on To: and Cc: headers, before the messages are read.

Does anyone know if you can save all messages, instead of holding down the "y" key, which is macro'ed as specified below? Is there a way to execute the "y" macro N times, where N is the number of messages in a mail box? How about saving messages to their "save-hook"'d places, instead of to t

Re: Mutt: Reading POP3 mail and moving the messages to folders based on To: and Cc: headers, before the messages are read.

On 010321, at 17:17:47, Malcolm Boekhoff wrote > Does anyone know how to put an "if" construct inside one of these macros? > Byrial Jensen posted a patch against 1.3.2 last spring which added an if command. Perhaps it is still available on one of the archives. -- David Ellement

Re: script for forwarding to spamcop.net?

On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:04:50PM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote: > Does anyone have a script for forwarding mail from mutt to > spamcop.net? If so, how do you use it? Something like ricochet or adcomplain.pl? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]innominate AG System Engineer

Re: Mutt: Reading POP3 mail and moving the messages to folders based on To: and Cc: headers, before the messages are read.

On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 06:17:31PM -, Malcolm Boekhoff wrote: > Does anyone know if you can save all messages, instead of holding down > the "y" key, which is macro'ed as specified below? > > Is there a way to execute the "y" macro N times, where N is the number > of messages in a mail box? >

Re: script for forwarding to spamcop.net?

Ralf Hildebrandt proclaimed on mutt-users that: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2001 at 12:04:50PM -0600, Lance Simmons wrote: > > Does anyone have a script for forwarding mail from mutt to > > spamcop.net? If so, how do you use it? > Something like ricochet or adcomplain.pl? Or something like

SMTP AUTH

hello, Is there a patch that supports the SMTP AUTH command? Thanks in advance. Regards, Z. -- ^ { Peter BARABAS } { [EMAIL PROTECTED] } { [EMAIL PROTECTED] } $ {\n} ^ $me = 'Z0D'; $me_regexp = '/^(Z[03]D|q{Z0D})$/'; $ {\n} ^ daemon:x:1:1:the Devil himself:/usr/sbi

Re: SMTP AUTH

Peter BARABAS proclaimed on mutt-users that: > Is there a patch that supports the SMTP AUTH command? You'd need to set up sendmail / postfix / whatever for that. That's not mutt's job. hth --s -- Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis mallet @ cluestick.org + Lumber C

Re: SMTP AUTH

>>> Suresh Ramasubramanian had the thought that... <<< > Peter BARABAS proclaimed on mutt-users that: > > > Is there a patch that supports the SMTP AUTH command? > > You'd need to set up sendmail / postfix / whatever for that. That's not > mutt's job. In other words mutt does not support