Re: Summary: courier-mta BROKEN.

2000-12-04 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 01:27:28PM -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: Sigh. The two of you have fought this out very bitterly, and I've followed the conversations with interest, but it still hasn't given me a solution to my liking. Here are my requirements: 1. Be able to use GPG and mutt, and be able

Re: PGP Setup 2.6.2 & 6.5.8

2000-12-04 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi Martin, Martin wrote: >When you look in your mutt/contrib directory you will find a file callled >gpg.rc for GnuPG, which i recommend right here, and some pgpX.rc files. >You only have to source the right file to your muttrc (see the >mutt manual for that) In my gpg.rc i find: # receive key fr

Re: Exec Error 127

2000-12-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 12:37:47PM -0800, Jason Helfman wrote: > Look at your "set editor" variable in .muttrc file. > > Once I had it set to vi, when I didn't have that installed, but I had > vim installed, and received the same error. > > On Sun, Dec 03, 2000 at 02:41:59PM +0100, Gian Piero As

Recording Bcc fields in fcc copy

2000-12-04 Thread Julian Gilbey
[Please cc replies to me!] I want to save any Bcc headers I have used in copies of mail I save to file using the Fcc: feature. Mutt seems to strip them before it saves the mail to file, which is really annoying. Is there any way I can do this? (Haven't found any mention of this behaviour in th

Re: Summary: courier-mta BROKEN.

2000-12-04 Thread Sam Varshavchik
Anand Buddhdev writes: > My question to Sam then is: Why does courier choose to rewrite the headers > in the body of the message? They are in the correct format, and all courier > is doing is re-arranging their order, thereby making the message > unverifiable. Why can't courier leave those header

Re: Summary: courier-mta BROKEN.

2000-12-04 Thread Anand Buddhdev
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 12:32:51PM +, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > > My question to Sam then is: Why does courier choose to rewrite the headers > > in the body of the message? They are in the correct format, and all courier > > is doing is re-arranging their order, thereby making the message > >

Re: Summary: courier-mta BROKEN.

2000-12-04 Thread Lars Hecking
> Ok. I've attached the message here. It has a Content-Type charset > specified. It also specifies a Content-Transfer-Encoding header. Both were > inserted by mutt. What courier did was not to change the headers, but to > re-order them, and that caused the signature to become invalid. So, the >

Re: Summary: courier-mta BROKEN.

2000-12-04 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-12-04 11:44:55 +0100, Anand Buddhdev wrote: > My reading and understanding of the debate you had is that RFC > 1847 requires mail clients to create messages that don't need > conversion. This is what mutt is doing, right Thomas? Yes. In order to play absolutely safe, you may also wish t

"set my_hdr" via macro

2000-12-04 Thread William Maddler
Hi all from a newcomer! :)) As a welcome I have a nice Q... :))) I need to send mails using different address/signature couples... I can use send_hooks for replying but can I use macros to issue a "set my_hdr" command? I have: macro index "set my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" "Send as wm

Re: "set my_hdr" via macro

2000-12-04 Thread Thorsten Haude
Hi, >whe I press F9 Mutt says "no mailbox open". > >Any clue? Thx... Well, do you have a mailbox open? Thorsten

Re: "set my_hdr" via macro

2000-12-04 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 03:40:18PM +0100, William Maddler wrote: > > I need to send mails using different address/signature couples... > I can use send_hooks for replying but can I use macros to issue a > "set my_hdr" command? > I use different my_hdr commands based on the mail folder, e.g.

Re: "set my_hdr" via macro

2000-12-04 Thread Morten Bo Johansen
William Maddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I need to send mails using different address/signature couples... > I can use send_hooks for replying but can I use macros to issue a > "set my_hdr" command? > > I have: >macro index "set my_hdr From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" "Send as wm" > > in

Re: Summary: courier-mta BROKEN.

2000-12-04 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-12-04 12:32:51 +, Sam Varshavchik wrote: > Without looking at the entire message I can't say. Possible > reasons that can trigger rewriting are: > * Unspecified content-type charset. Courier will provide one. There is no such thing as an unspecified content-type charset which need

[Fwd: Re: "set my_hdr" via macro]

2000-12-04 Thread Peter Pentchev
Whoops I forgot to CC: the list on that one.. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence no verb. - Forwarded message from Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 16:54:46 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: William Maddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: "set m

message to Peter Pentchev

2000-12-04 Thread William Maddler
looks like in ur test u left [EMAIL PROTECTED] as ur mail address... ;))) I have a couple mails here for u... lemme know ur addie... ;)) -- .~.::: :: /V\ PENGUIN WILLIAM::MADDLER community manager :: :: /(_)\ POWER

Wrong "Lines" count in the header after attachment deleted

2000-12-04 Thread Petr Hlustik
Hi, A trivial problem using 1.2i: after I delete an attachment, sometimes the index keeps showing huge message size, possibly because the Lines: field in the header has not been modified. If I try showing headers and edit-message, this field is off limits. Any ideas how to fix this? Thanks, Petr

Re: PGP Setup 2.6.2 & 6.5.8

2000-12-04 Thread Martin
Monday, December 04, 2000 (CS:1.49.339) 12:06:46 [PM] (+0100) Thorsten Haude [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... > Hi Martin, > > Martin wrote: > >When you look in your mutt/contrib directory you will find a file callled > >gpg.rc for GnuPG, which i recommend right here, and some pgpX.rc files. > >You

Re: PGP Setup 2.6.2 & 6.5.8

2000-12-04 Thread Rod Pike
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:01:27PM +0100, Martin wrote: > On Friday, December 01, 2000 (CS:5.48.336) 15:24:57 [PM] (-0500) > Eric Ekong [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... > > > Well, I have been trying to configuring Mutt with PGP and I have > > not succeed as of yet. Can anyone submit the relevant c

hostname & use_domain

2000-12-04 Thread Ben Heard
Help, I was under the impression that I could set hostname to the domain I wanted email addresses expanded to and then set use_domain so that Mutt would expand email addresses. set hostname=netscape.net set use_domain=yes So when I write and email to 'joeuser' Mutt expands to

Re: PGP Setup 2.6.2 & 6.5.8

2000-12-04 Thread Martin
On Monday, December 04, 2000 (CS:1.49.339) 21:54:30 [PM] (-0200) Rod Pike [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... > > When you look in your mutt/contrib directory you will find a file callled > > gpg.rc for GnuPG, which i recommend right here, and some pgpX.rc files. > > You only have to source the right fi

saved attachment's permissions

2000-12-04 Thread Mike E
Hello list, Is there a way I can change the default permissions for saved attachments? If so, how? tia, Mike

Q Forawrd without previous headers?

2000-12-04 Thread Jonathan Gift
Hi, I find that when I'm forwarding an email, it forwards all the previous headers. There must be a setting in .muttrc to turn it off. I tried unset forward_quote but no go. Any help appreciated. thanks, Jonathan -- "Hey, I think I finally got the hang of i-"

Re: Q Forawrd without previous headers?

2000-12-04 Thread Gary Johnson
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 09:09:23PM +0100, Jonathan Gift wrote: > I find that when I'm forwarding an email, it forwards all the previous > headers. There must be a setting in .muttrc to turn it off. I tried > unset forward_quote but no go. The 'weed' variable is the one you're looking for. When