Re: Latest stable mutt?

On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:28:42PM +, Conor Daly wrote: > Er, too lazy to go online by hand to find out what's the latest _stable_ > mutt. Anyone care to tell me? PS. I like IMAP... > > Current mutt is 1.0.1 and is *extremely* slow over imap between two RH6.2 > boxen on a small 10BaseT LAN.

Re: View .doc & .xls

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:13:23AM +0100, Martin Schweizer wrote: > Hello > > How can I see the above files with mutt(1.0.1i) on a FreeBSD-Box (4.0) without > StarOffice? > Thanks in advance. > If you don't mind using X-programs, but like me only dont want to start this beast StartOffice you c

Re: View .doc & .xls

> How can I see the above files with mutt(1.0.1i) on a FreeBSD-Box (4.0) without > StarOffice? > Thanks in advance. > Martin I remember reading about a program "msword2html" that could convert .doc files to html. -neelakanth

Re: Latest stable mutt?

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 08:38:43AM + or so it is rumoured hereabouts, Chris Green thought: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:28:42PM +, Conor Daly wrote: > > Er, too lazy to go online by hand to find out what's the latest _stable_ > > mutt. Anyone care to tell me? PS. I like IMAP... > > > >

Re: View .doc & .xls

Hi all! On Tue, 07 Nov 2000, Jan Houtsma wrote: > On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 12:13:23AM +0100, Martin Schweizer wrote: > > Hello > > > > How can I see the above files with mutt(1.0.1i) on a FreeBSD-Box (4.0) without > > StarOffice? > > If you don't mind using X-programs, but like me only dont wan

spell checking

Is there a way to integrate some spell checking utility with mutt? I use vi as the editor . . . . Ta, Frank -- frank joerdens joerdens new media urbanstr. 116 10967 berlin germany e: [EMAIL PROTECTED] t: +49 (0)30 69597650 f: +49 (0)30 7864046 h: http://www.joerdens.de pgp pu

Re: spell checking

You can use ispell from the compose menu. On 2000-11-07 14:36:55 +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote: > Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2000 14:36:55 +0100 > From: Frank Joerdens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: spell checking > User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.2i > > Is there a way to integrate some spell c

Re: spell checking

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote: > Is there a way to integrate some spell checking utility with mutt? I use > vi as the editor . . . . Mutt will use ispell from the pre-send dialogue if you press i but this may need to be configured (such as at compile-time).

Re: limiting to message size

Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 06 Nov 2000: > Hi, I'm using mutt 1.2.5i and was wondering if there were some > convient way to match messages based on the number of paragraphs, > lines, words, characters, etc.? No way currently. Well, characters is the same as the message

Re: spell checking

Frank Joerdens [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > Is there a way to integrate some spell checking utility with mutt? I use > vi as the editor . . . . You can try adding this to your $HOME/.exrc file. map ;S :w:!clear;ispell %:e! The needs to be converted to ^M if you version of vi doesn't understa

customize index_format for *one* mailbox?

I'd like to customize the "index_format" for my "sent" mailbox to list the "to:" address instead of the "from:" address that it now displays. Is this possible to do for just one mailbox? Maybe with a folder-hook? TIA. -- Hardy Merrill Mission Critical Linux, Inc. http://www.missioncriticallinu

Re: customize index_format for *one* mailbox?

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 10:39:27AM -0500, Hardy Merrill wrote: > I'd like to customize the "index_format" for my "sent" mailbox > to list the "to:" address instead of the "from:" address that > it now displays. Is this possible to do for just one mailbox? > Maybe with a folder-hook? > > TIA. Ye

unsubscribe

I lost my mailbox with all messages of mutt-users list :( How unsubscribe this list? _ Osvaldo Santana Neto - aCiDBaSe [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.acidbase.cjb.net

Re: customize index_format for *one* mailbox?

On 2000.11.07 10:39:27, you, the extraordinary Hardy Merrill, opined: > I'd like to customize the "index_format" for my "sent" mailbox > to list the "to:" address instead of the "from:" address that > it now displays. Is this possible to do for just one mailbox? > Maybe with a folder-hook? >

Re: customize index_format for *one* mailbox?

Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 07 Nov 2000: > I'd like to customize the "index_format" for my "sent" mailbox > to list the "to:" address instead of the "from:" address that > it now displays. Is this possible to do for just one mailbox? > Maybe with a folder-hook? You can do it

Re: spell checking

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Frank Joerdens wrote: > Is there a way to integrate some spell checking utility with mutt? I use > vi as the editor . . . . If you're looking for spell checking while you're writing AND you're using vim, this highlights your spelling mistakes as you type:

Mailbox size limitations...

Greetings... I was wondering if there are any procmail recipes or mutt commands that would allow me to limit the size of my mailboxes (folders). Thanks in advance.. -- Scott A. Davis - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Austin, Texas USA --

Re: Mailbox size limitations...

On Tue, Nov 07, 2000 at 11:24:36AM -0600, Scott Davis wrote: > I was wondering if there are any procmail recipes or mutt commands that > would allow me to limit the size of my mailboxes (folders). Thanks in > advance.. Not directly. What most people do is figure out about how much mail they rec

sorting by threads

Hi, I have this in my .muttrc: folder-hook =mutt set sort=threads but it just doesn't work. I tried some other things with quotation and the like, but mutt doesn't thread this folder automatically. I'm using Mutt 1.2.5. Thanks! -- Wouter Verheijen [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: sorting by threads

Wouter Verheijen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 07 Nov 2000: > folder-hook =mutt set sort=threads > > but it just doesn't work. One thing to check is that you specify $folder *before* this, and that you don't change it afterwards... The = is expanded when the command is seen, and if you chan

Re: IMAP blues

-: set envelope_from Ok, that did the trick. Thanks! But, I'm still wondering why some (subscriber-only) list servers still accepted my mail even before I set `envelope-from' (whereas [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not). Do list servers use different header fields to identify the sender and/or generat

Re: limiting to message size

On 2000.11.07, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Mikko Hänninen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jonathan Scott Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 06 Nov 2000: > > Hi, I'm using mutt 1.2.5i and was wondering if there were some > > convient way to match messages based on the number of paragraphs, >

Re: sorting by threads

Mikko Hänninen muttered: > If that doesn't help, you might just want to try "folder-hook mutt", > without the =. Of course that has the drawback that it would also > match "mutt-dev", in fact anything with "mutt" in the name. =mutt matches mutt-dev, too. If fact it matches every string with has

Re: IMAP blues

JT Williams proclaimed on mutt-users that: > -: set envelope_from > Ok, that did the trick. Thanks! > But, I'm still wondering why some (subscriber-only) list servers > still accepted my mail even before I set `envelope-from' (whereas > [EMAIL PROTECTED] did not). Do list servers use diff

Please help

Dear mutt user, please help me with my prob. when I run the command : mutt -f /home/user/Maildir I get all the messages have a length of 0? I already read this in faq but they advise to use this in procmail. Is there any other way how can i correct this problem? Thanks in advance!