Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Someone sent me a mail with about 12 attachments, some I need, some I
> don't, some I need to forward to a machine on a different network. Is
> their a way to tell mutt to forward a message and select attachments
> to be forwarded with the messages
>
On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 05:43:16PM -0500, Rob Reid wrote:
> Stephan Helma sent me the following patch to merge mutt-alias.el
> into post.el and provide menus for expaing aliases inside emacs. I prefer
> to expand aliases inside mutt instead of my editor, so I have not folded
> it into post,
Is there a way to change the tag-delete behavior so that when tagged
messages are marked as deleted, the messages are also untagged? I know
I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd rather invent no new
keystrokes if possible. Or should I just start praticing the habit of
tag-save to /dev/n
Eugene --
...and then Eugene Lee said...
% Is there a way to change the tag-delete behavior so that when tagged
% messages are marked as deleted, the messages are also untagged? I know
% I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd rather invent no new
% keystrokes if possible. Or should I ju
On 2000-02-28 02:48:42 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
> Is there a way to change the tag-delete behavior so that when
> tagged messages are marked as deleted, the messages are also
> untagged? I know I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd
> rather invent no new keystrokes if possible. Or shou
Jens Wilhelm Wulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought that the codes from terminfo are the ones programs see (if
> they use it, no matter how it is done), and so it is important that
> terminfo is correct.
The codes you refer to in terminfo are actually strings, whereas the
value KEY_NPAGE i
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 05:47:27PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
:
:Seriously, the unstable branch has the following option:
:
: delete_untag
: Type: boolean
: Default: yes
:
: If this option is set, mutt will untag messages when marking
: them for deletion. This app
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If I remember rightly, slang does not use terminfo, but termcap instead.
It uses terminfo on systems that have it. For others, it uses
termcap.
--John
Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I know I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd rather invent no
> new keystrokes if possible. Or should I just start practicing the
> habit of tag-save to /dev/null? :)
Is this really what you do? Waste time writing messages to /dev/null
(it isn
John E. Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If I remember rightly, slang does not use terminfo
>
> It uses terminfo on systems that have it. For others, it uses termcap.
Thanks, I'll stop spreading misinformation now. :)
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 03:03:19PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
:Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>
:> I know I can do this by setting up a new key, but I'd rather invent no
:> new keystrokes if possible. Or should I just start practicing the
:> habit of tag-save to /dev/null? :)
:
:Is thi
I would like to open a dialogue with anyone who is using mutt in
conjunction with procmail and mh-style mailboxes. I've got some
configuration questions.
Thanks,
Phil
--
Phil Staub Dragonfly Software Consulting Company.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 81
Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Often I will tag lots of messages with certain subjects (usually when
> the thread has become a flame fest), then do a ";d". But I'd like
> that action to also untag the messages at the same time, which ";s"
> does.
I have always considered the 'untag-on
On Mon, Feb 28, 2000 at 06:12:21PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
:
:I have always considered the 'untag-on-save' feature to be a bug. It is
:an inconsistency in the way Mutt handles tagged messages, because no
:other operation causes the tags to be removed after performing the
:operation.
It is a
14 matches
Mail list logo
