Eugene Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Often I will tag lots of messages with certain subjects (usually when
> the thread has become a flame fest), then do a ";d". But I'd like
> that action to also untag the messages at the same time, which ";s"
> does.
I have always considered the 'untag-on-save' feature to be a bug. It is
an inconsistency in the way Mutt handles tagged messages, because no
other operation causes the tags to be removed after performing the
operation. That means that, if I do tag-save a bunch of messages,
there's no way for me to un-delete only those messages that I tagged,
because the tags are removed for me.
But I digress. :)
> (Yes, I'm almost too lazy to do ";t" ;-)
And also too lazy to install the development Mutt 1.1? It already has
the feature that you want! :)
I have been using the devel-versions of Mutt for over a year now, and I
find them to be extremely stable and useful. Even moreso now, because
the developers are targeting a final release, so things are stabilizing
even more.
> BTW, I noticed that if I try to ";s" to /dev/null, it fails!
>
> fcntl: Invalid argument (errno = 22)
Yes, Mutt wants to lock '/dev/null' and cannot do so. I don't know
whether to call that a bug or af eature. :)
--
David DeSimone | "The doctrine of human equality reposes on this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | that there is no man really clever who has not
Hewlett-Packard | found that he is stupid." -- Gilbert K. Chesterson
UX WTEC Engineer | PGP: 5B 47 34 9F 3B 9A B0 0D AB A6 15 F1 BB BE 8C 44
