Re: [Announce] mutt-1.0.1 is out.

2000-01-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-01-30 18:46:46 +0100, Piotr Kucharski wrote: > I have two postponed messages and now I try to send new mail, but > after hitting 'q' when in "postponed menu" it quits back to inbox > menu, instead (as it was in 0.96) giving me "To:" prompt. Reading > manual.txt didn't help me. Am I missin

Re: mutt-1.0.1 is out.

2000-01-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 31 Jan 2000: > > I have two postponed messages and now I try to send new mail, but > > after hitting 'q' when in "postponed menu" it quits back to inbox > > menu, instead (as it was in 0.96) giving me "To:" prompt. > > Yes. Don't press , press .

Re: mutt-1.0.1 is out.

2000-01-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-01-31 12:53:36 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: >> Yes. Don't press , press . > How would one get around this if $recall is set to "yes"? Ah, ok, I missed that possibility. It's indeed possible that this setting doesn't work as possibly expected currently. -- http://www.guug.de/~roessle

command line option -F

2000-01-31 Thread Christian v. Mueffling
Hello! In the Mutt doc (Part "6.1 Command line options") is written: -F specify an alternate file to read initialization commands But when i start mutt with '-F /somewhere/.muttrc' also my ~/.muttrc file is readed ... do i miss something? chris

Re: command line option -F

2000-01-31 Thread Christian v. Mueffling
* Christian von Mueffling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000131 13:07]: > In the Mutt doc (Part "6.1 Command line options") is written: > >-F specify an alternate file to read initialization commands > But when i start mutt with '-F /somewhere/.muttrc' also my ~/.muttrc > file is readed ... do i

using procmail

2000-01-31 Thread mike irwin
i am looking for some good info on using procmail w/ mutt. anybody have any suggestions? -- - mike irwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]

look Ma, no Pine

2000-01-31 Thread Jim Breton
As some of you may remember I just "discovered" Mutt only a few days ago. Well, those few days have been awesome, Mutt is unbelievable! I do have a few questions though. :) For one, I'm always wondering if anyone has any patches for matching on something other than the beginning of a Subject

Re: qmail and From:

2000-01-31 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 07:40:05PM -0700, Patrick Walsh wrote: > As far as I can tell setting the From: when using qmail with mutt > requires that the environment variables MAILUSER, MAILHOST, MAILNAME > be set before starting mutt, along with QMAILINJECT=f. > > Is there a way to change the From:

mutt and slrn

2000-01-31 Thread Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE
Hi is here a way how to set mutt as mailer in slrn. I tryed Svens solution: set mail_editor_command "mutt -H '%s' ; exit 1" but this does not work perfect. -- The messenger is not important!

Re: look Ma, no Pine

2000-01-31 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
On Sat, Jan 29, 2000 at 04:18:47AM -0500, Jim Breton wrote: > As some of you may remember I just "discovered" Mutt only a few days ago. > Well, those few days have been awesome, Mutt is unbelievable! I hope you discover the "74 characters wrapping" feature of your editor real soon now :) > Fo

Re: [Announce] mutt-1.0.1 is out.

2000-01-31 Thread Piotr Kucharski
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 09:53:16AM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > I have two postponed messages and now I try to send new mail, but > > after hitting 'q' when in "postponed menu" it quits back to inbox > > menu, instead (as it was in 0.96) giving me "To:" prompt. Reading > > manual.txt didn't h

$recall (was: mutt-1.0.1 is out.)

2000-01-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Piotr Kucharski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 31 Jan 2000: > Reading further I see Mikko gave me a hint, indeed I have $recall > set to "yes". I will set it to "no", but still, I think it's a bug > and would love to have it fixed. :-) Well, as a further hint, it's a quad-option. So other tha

Re: using procmail

2000-01-31 Thread Telsa Gwynne
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 07:35:56AM -0500 or thereabouts, mike irwin wrote: > i am looking for some good info on using procmail w/ mutt. anybody > have any suggestions? I already had procmail installed on my machine, so it was simply a matter of getting lots of friends' .procmailrcs (I'm amazed

Printing command I wish to use...

2000-01-31 Thread Jason Helfman
I wish to use this command for printing: cat document.txt|fold|pr|lpr or this: cat document.txt|fold|lpr How can I set this up in .muttrc? I am not at home so I don't know which one I will use just yet. thanks in adv. jason

qmail and the sender part III

2000-01-31 Thread romulus
Hi, people! The postings on `qmail and From:' were quite interesting to me too, as I also was digging in this very ground. My trouble is that on my System (RH 6.0) qmail seems unable to parse multi-word settings in MAILUSER or, even worse, makes several senders out of MAILHOST='arcormail.d

Re: qmail and From:

2000-01-31 Thread Patrick Walsh
Sorry, this original query was held up a few days as it was sent from an unsubscribed address, the issue has been dealt with. Turns out by _not_ using the QMAILINJECT or [Q]MAIL* variables mutt has full session control over the sender's address, both in From: and Return-Path: headings. mutt does

Re: Printing command I wish to use...

2000-01-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 31 Jan 2000: > I wish to use this command for printing: > > cat document.txt|fold|pr|lpr set print_command="fold|pr|lpr" > or this: > > cat document.txt|fold|lpr set print_command="fold|lpr" You don't need the "cat" since Mutt will feed the

Re: $recall (was: mutt-1.0.1 is out.)

2000-01-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-01-31 17:11:54 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > Well, as a further hint, it's a quad-option. So other than "yes" > and "no" you can also have "ask-yes" and "ask-no". I guess very > few people have it set to "yes", "ask-yes" is much nicer (IMHO > anyway). > But, you're right, it's still a

Re: qmail and the sender part III

2000-01-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Hello, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 31 Jan 2000: > My trouble is that on my > System (RH 6.0) qmail seems unable to parse multi-word settings in > MAILUSER or, even worse, makes several senders out of > > MAILHOST='arcormail.de (R. M. Lampert)' > > going on like this:

Re: mutt and slrn

2000-01-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 2000-01-31 15:04:32 +0100, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote: > I tryed Svens solution: > set mail_editor_command "mutt -H '%s' ; exit 1" > but this does not work perfect. I'm using the attached slrn macro file, plus the attached shell script wrapper. Note that this solution requires

Re: Printing

2000-01-31 Thread Thomas Ribbrock
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 12:23:40AM -0600, Jason Helfman wrote: > Anyone have any tips on Printing of messages. Mine keep streaming off > the page, I've resolved it somewhat, but not completely. Any suggestions > or ideas that I can be pointed out would be great. Thanks. I'm using "enscript", whic

Re: Printing

2000-01-31 Thread Holger Eitzenberger
On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 11:22:40PM +, Thomas Ribbrock wrote: > > the page, I've resolved it somewhat, but not completely. Any suggestions > > or ideas that I can be pointed out would be great. Thanks. > > I'm using "enscript", which is an ASCII to Postscript converter. It can > prettyprint a

Re: mutt and slrn

2000-01-31 Thread Aaron Schrab
At 19:16 +0100 31 Jan 2000, Thomas Roessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # A small script which is used to reply to or forward an > # article from within slrn. Really, it's not so small. :) I haven't done this (haven't needed to, since trn already provides a way to use an external mail program),

Tagging on To line??

2000-01-31 Thread Charles Curley
I have tons of email I'd like to tag based on the contents of the To: line. Searching (T) doesn't seem to do it. How can I do that? Thanks. -- -- C^2 No windows were crashed in the making of this email. Looking for fine software and/or web pages? http://w3.trib.com/~ccurley

Re: Tagging on To line??

2000-01-31 Thread Jim Breton
Hi. Using: ~t works for me. (With the T command which you've already got.) On Mon, Jan 31, 2000 at 10:26:38PM -0700, Charles Curley wrote: > I have tons of email I'd like to tag based on the contents of the To: > line. Searching (T) doesn't seem to do it. How can I do that? Thanks. > > --