Hi David!
On Thu, 11 Nov 1999, David DeSimone wrote:
> Sean Rima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts
> > > the header 'X-Status: D'.
> >
> > Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
>
> Alas, my current mail filter is a
Hi Rejo!
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> ++ 11/11/99 22:11 + - Sean Rima:
> >> My mail filter detects spam, but instead of deleting it, it inserts the
> >> header 'X-Status: D'. Thus, when I enter my mailbox, all the spam is
> >>
> >Any chance of seeing your filter, sounds good.
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 08:51:12AM +0100, Pieter Wenk thus spoke:
> Hello to all,
>
> How do I tell mutt, that I should like to to have a print ?
>
> I ckecked my muttrc concerning the key-bindings. Found
> nothing.
>
> Tried "p"...no action
Assuming it's not built in anywhere (I'm not checkin
On 1999-11-12 08:16:58 +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> Some of them are derived from the Spamdunk filters, but have been
> changed and extended over the course of time. See my procmailrc at
> http://www.mediaport.org/~sister/personal/procmailrc for more info.
Looks quite interesting. Please donate it
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 12 Nov 1999:
> > How do I tell mutt, that I should like to to have a print ?
> >
> > Tried "p"...no action
Check the value of the $print quadoption. I have a hunch it might be
set to "no". Default is "ask-no". Another alternative is that you have
it
On ven, 12 nov 1999, Fairlight wrote:
>
>Assuming it's not built in anywhere (I'm not checking the manual at the
>moment), you could always just make a macro that does a pipe of the
>message to lpr...
>
>Something tells me you should look at the manual...there's bound to be a
>print -somewhere-
I hadn't seen a query_command program for qi on www.mutt.org, so I
wrote one. (I know they're around, but I was blinded or something and
I missed them.) I particularly didn't know about the one on Brandon
Long's archive that handles multiple servers, but mine handles them
better anyway. :)
We d
On ven, 12 nov 1999, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
Hello Mikko,
>p by default prints the message. In other words, it calls up the print
>command defined in $print_command (default "lpr" according to the
>manual) with the message text to print in STDIN. I believe the headers
>are formatted and weeded a
Pieter Wenk writes:
>
> Hm...well yes. Now I have the full manual. Wearing glasses,
> I could not see an entry "explaining" how to perform out of
> mutt such a fundamental job as printing, any second class
> E-Mailer does by default in hitting just a printer icon.
Perhaps it's time to check you
Is anyone having problems connecting to it? This is what i get after
a simple traceroute:
traceroute to ftp.mutt.org (134.95.80.189), 30 hops max, 38 byte packets
1 gp-rtr-1.chatlink.com (205.139.105.254) 3.256 ms 1.552 ms 1.490 ms
2 core1-ashland-s1-3-4.mind.net (206.151.156.17) 11.150
> Debian's /etc/Muttrc is a complete disaster in my experience. It
> almost put me off mutt when I first tried it.
>
> It's probably a good idea to delete the file altogether.
Hm, good idea, but that doesn't answer whether I found a bug in mutt.
Any developers reading this?
Ciao,
Andy.
--
E-
On 1999-11-12 02:34:56 -0800, Eugene Lee wrote:
> 29 dfn.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.53) 112.526 ms 111.764 ms 109.744 ms
> 30 dfn-side.ny.dante.net (212.1.200.54) 109.029 ms 110.888 ms 109.842 ms
That's bad. It does essentially mean that the German research
network's international connecti
Hi!
How can I tell mutt to colorize *and* eg underline something?
For example, I'd like to have error messages in red and bold face,
links in some color and underlined, and so on.
Yours, Rüdiger.
--
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.math.umass.edu/~kuhlmann/
I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find
the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on
mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere?
(I just had a really nifty majordomo idea, but that's a little *too*
off-topic.)
-Rich
--
---
Hi,
when I read the attached mail mutt only displays the signature
and tells me it can't find an entry for text/html. I have to view
the attachments to see the text/plain part.
Any idea what's going wrong?
Thanks in advance
Martin
> mutt -version
Mutt 1.0i (1999-10-22)
Copyright (C) 1996-9 M
On 1999-11-12 09:12:52 -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find
> the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on
> mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere?
Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/p
Hi !
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere?
> Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ?
or http://www.keyserver.net ?
Christian
--
There are three ways to get something done:
(1) Do it yoursel
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> On 1999-11-12 09:12:52 -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find
> > the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on
> > mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public k
On 1999-11-12 16:05:17 +0100, Christian Gall wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > > Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere?
> > Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ?
> or http://www.keyserver.net ?
I didn't knew this, but have to
On 1999-11-12 16:21:23 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> On 1999-11-12 16:05:17 +0100, Christian Gall wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > > > Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere?
> > > Don't think so. You know http://www.pgp.net/pgpnet/ ?
> >
Quoting Dave Holland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:17:48PM
+:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 03:30:36PM +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> > On 1999-11-12 09:12:52 -0500, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > > I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find
> > > the right
Pieter Wenk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 12 Nov 1999:
> This is what I have in .muttrc with regards to printing:
>
> set print=ask-yes
> set print_command="a2ps -nn -ns -nH -p -1 -B -F10 -nL | lpr"
>
> Now, normally I thought with "p" the printing should start ?
Yes, it should. I have $pr
On Fre, 12 Nov 1999, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> (I just had a really nifty majordomo idea, but that's a little *too*
> off-topic.)
Maybe you can fix that "sh: pgp not found" error first ;-)
Dirk
Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > So if everyone has a mail filter then why use "alternates" at all?
>
> Because $alternates has a lot less to do with filtering incoming mail
> than it has to do with getting the correct From: address when you
> reply to mail, etc.
In my eyes, the ma
Nathan Cullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
>
> alternates dre@chronic\.net
> alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us
Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really
supported regular expressions. Once the regexp ability was added
Richard P. Groenewegen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ''
>
> but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only
> recipient.
Isn't there a pattern modifier "^" that means "only"?
send-hook '^~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ''
That matc
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
:Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>
:> Wishlist?
:
:No disrespect intended, Sven, but do people read your wish list?
I just did. It took a while to find it, and it's actually located under
Sven's home page and not the Mutt ho
I simply cannot get Mutt to show German characters in the pager. The
characters either show up as ?'s or (worse yet) as Cyrillic-looking
letters. Even if I set LANG=de, the German menu items have the same
Cyrillic letters in them.
I've enabled NLS in Mutt. My .muttrc file contains the line
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 07:10:25 +0100, Richard P. Groenewegen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here's something that's either trivial or impossible. I want
> something like
>
> send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' ''
>
> but I'll only want this send-hook to work if [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the only
> recipien
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 11:36:08 +0100, Andy Spiegl wrote:
> Hm, good idea, but that doesn't answer whether I found a bug in mutt.
> Any developers reading this?
There is a maximum number of color definitions which is imposed by
the terminal handling library (curses or slang). When you make a
new
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 15:26:56 +0100, Martin Schröder wrote:
> Hi,
> when I read the attached mail mutt only displays the signature
> and tells me it can't find an entry for text/html. I have to view
> the attachments to see the text/plain part.
>
> Any idea what's going wrong?
Yes. The mail i
Howard Arons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I simply cannot get Mutt to show German characters in the pager. The
> characters either show up as ?'s or (worse yet) as Cyrillic-looking
> letters. Even if I set LANG=de, the German menu items have the same
> Cyrillic letters in them.
Are you runnin
1999-11-12-09:12:52 Rich Lafferty:
> I've realized lately that I see an awful lot of "WARNING: Can't find
> the right public key-- can't check signature integrity" on
> mutt-users. :-) Is there a mutt public keyring out there anywhere?
By one of those totally whizzo coincidences, the same questio
Hi!
I can't compile mutt-1.0 under IRIX64 6.2 03131016 IP19.
There is no charsets.[alias|list] in the charsets-directory.
It seems, the system doesn't have i81l oder nls installed.
./configure --enable-pop --enable-imap --enable-flock --enable-fcntl
--disable-nls --enable-compressed
Any hints
On Fri, Nov 12, 1999 at 01:04:55PM -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > Why (rhetorical question) can't I do it with alternates?
> > alternates dre@chronic\.net
> > alternates snoop@lbc\.ca.us
> Actually, it used to be that way, but that was before Mutt really
> supported regular expressions. Once th
On Wed, Nov 10, 1999 at 07:09:44PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > I have some letters that comes to me with "To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Every time
> > i responding this message i need to add "CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]". Now i do this
> > by hands. Is there any way to do it automatically?
> Does using g
Martin Baehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 13 Nov 1999:
> not in my case (i have the same problem) because the To:
> address is one of my alternates...
> i need it there, because it is an admin-role adress
> where all replies should come with a From: with that address
How about remove it fro
On Sat, Nov 13, 1999 at 04:26:39AM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> > not in my case (i have the same problem) because the To:
> > address is one of my alternates...
> > i need it there, because it is an admin-role adress
> > where all replies should come with a From: with that address
> How about
Apologies to non-developers for a slightly off topic post. I am
writing on Open Source Software & Best Practices (e.g., peer review,
source code management, ego-less programming, and defect tracking).
The first draft is at muskrat.home.texas.net/oss_bp.html. I am
looking for other examples. If
39 matches
Mail list logo
