Alex Kapranoff:
> We have two letters a key - latin and cyrillic. And we have a switch key
> (I use Caps Lock - FreeBSD default). I change to Russian only writing
> letters to pals - all programming, config editing and mailling lists are
> just plain good old English. I like mutt giving me mess
Mutt 1.0pre3 is out. This is another version from the release
candidate series. The reason for immediately releasing this version
is a buffer overflow in the text/enriched handler which can be
triggered by means of suitably-formatted e-mail messages. Thus, we
recommend you upgrade your mutt ins
Hi,
When I receive emails from people who use %$#@& outlook there is no
In-Reply-To field even though they have replied to me rather than
compose a new mail (the subject is indeed Re: ).
Having failed to persuade them to use a real MUA, I was wondering if
the following exists in mutt: it would s
Is there a way to rebind search and search-next to function in
a similar way as in emacs?
Right now I have search on Ctrl-S and search-next on Ctrl-N,
but I would like to have Ctrl-S do search-next's too, like
emacs.
Thanks,
Staffan Hamala
I post my problem again, but now in a readable format.
I dont know if post to mutt or mutt-dev, so I crosspost to both:
I was using mutt for a long time without any problems. A few days ago I
decided to upgrade to mutt1.0pre2i and now I am doomed.
Mutt opens the defaultmailbox ($mail) and s
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 06:46:39PM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
> When I receive emails from people who use %$#@& outlook there is no
> In-Reply-To field even though they have replied to me rather than
> compose a new mail (the subject is indeed Re: ).
>
> Having failed to persuade them
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > I *do* see Mutt leaving files in /tmp all the time, however.
>
> They're from emacs. They let multiple emacs processes know which files
I don't use emacs and have those files in /tmp too. They look like
mutt-kapran-{pid-of-mutt
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 10:28:21AM +0400, Alex Kapranoff wrote:
> I don't use emacs and have those files in /tmp too. They look like
> mutt-kapran-{pid-of-mutt}-15.
~/.saves-* files are from emacs. /tmp/mutt-* files are from mutt.
Brian
At 10:40 PM EDT on September 24 Mikko Hänninen sent off:
> Derek Quinn Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 24 Sep 1999:
> > would like to, in cases like this, match the To: field and specify the
> > save box that way. There are a lot of situations where this would be
> > nice to have so i fig
Quoting Alex Kapranoff ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) from Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at
10:28:21AM +0400:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 05:20:25PM -0400, Rich Lafferty wrote:
> > > I *do* see Mutt leaving files in /tmp all the time, however.
> >
> > They're from emacs. They let multiple emacs processes know which file
Op za. 25 sep 1999 21:01:11 zei Jan Peter Hecking:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 06:46:39PM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
> > When I receive emails from people who use %$#@& outlook there is no
> > In-Reply-To field even though they have replied to me rather than
> > compose a new mail (the
Stasinos Konstantopoulos [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Op za. 25 sep 1999 21:01:11 zei Jan Peter Hecking:
> > On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 06:46:39PM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
> > > When I receive emails from people who use %$#@& outlook there is no
> > > In-Reply-To field even though they
Hi,
could anyone explain to me what "backtick expansions" are, please?
(just for the sake of the manual translation).
TIA
--
Horacio LC_mutt=es_ES
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://carlotha.ciberia.es/mutt/
~ Spain ~ Spanje ~ Spanie
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 02:41:17AM +0200, J Horacio MG thus spoke:
> Hi,
>
> could anyone explain to me what "backtick expansions" are, please?
> (just for the sake of the manual translation).
Also known by several names such as "grave quote executions", these are
along the lines of:
pid=`ps au
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 01:04:12AM +0200, Stasinos Konstantopoulos wrote:
> I do have strict_threads set, and I think it's a good thing to have it
> so, but I would also like to be able to manually, explicitly add the
> odd message to a thread if I need to.
The following solution is kind of a hac
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 03:16:29AM +0200, Richard P. Groenewegen wrote:
> The following solution is kind of a hack, but you might like it. If
> have tested the code a little, but be careful with it. It is probably
> not that robust yet.
And it sure wasn't. When I tested it I had some debug out
16 matches
Mail list logo
