On Thu, Sep 09, 1999 at 06:10:10PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Chris Green [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I have been using mutt on a number of different systems for quite a
> > long while (since something like version 0.7x I think). It has served
> > me well and has become steadily better. H
Chris Green:
> What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> local folders to the user. Using fetchmail with mutt can't do this at
> all
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 01:23:00PM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> Chris Green:
>
> > What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> > individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> > work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinar
Hello Mark:
Thanks for the quick reply. Your suggestion works. That is,
sendmail now doesn't die when I try to SMTP a message, but the message
seems to go to that great bitbucket in the sky, because it (the message)
never arrives at the addressee, and all trace of the message's existenc
Hi,
I noticed this sort of strange behaviour, a minor irritant, and I was
wondering if there was a way to stop this from happening.
Even though I use a Finnish local on my system, I prefer to view my
folder/directory listings with English dates (month names). However,
to get proper attribution
Chris Green:
> > Is there a way of telling the MUA to delete a message locally (and not
> > download it again) but leave it on the server to be picked up by a
> > different machine later?
> >
> No, I don't think you could do this. Effectively what you have in
> tkrat is what looks exactly like
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Chris Green wrote:
>
> What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> local folders to the user. Using fetchmail wi
I have a weird question. Thanks to Sven, I recently learned that I
can pip from within mutt to 'vim -' to edit the current file, usually
a digest, and save to a file. Butt, I would like to be able to email
that file once I have edited it to what I want. Any way to open mutt
with this text file
Fairlight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try strictly: set sendmail="/path/to/sendmail -t"
Erf... don't do that. Mutt puts the addresses of the people to send to,
on the command line, so using -t is redundant, since it asks sendmail to
look in the headers of the message. Some sendmail's will a
Ken W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Sep 1999:
> I have a weird question. Thanks to Sven, I recently learned that I
> can pip from within mutt to 'vim -' to edit the current file, usually
> a digest, and save to a file. Butt, I would like to be able to email
> that file once I have edited
Ken W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have a weird question. Thanks to Sven, I recently learned that I
> can pip from within mutt to 'vim -' to edit the current file, usually
> a digest, and save to a file. Butt, I would like to be able to email
> that file once I have edited it to what I want.
I realize this isn't the most appropriate forum to ask this question,
but I have a feeling someone here knows the answer and might respond
quickly. Everytime I send a message that's signed with GPG, I get the
following output, and need to hit a character to return to mutt and
actually send the me
set the SUID bit on the gpg binary. the problem is -- so the gpg docs
go -- that, unless the program is being run as root, it could be swapped
out of memory and then, anyone who can read the swap device might be
able to get your password. now, if you have permissions on your swap
device set so t
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 02:29:38PM -0400, Pete Toscano wrote:
> set the SUID bit on the gpg binary. the problem is -- so the gpg docs
> go -- that, unless the program is being run as root, it could be swapped
> out of memory and then, anyone who can read the swap device might be
> able to get you
Hi,
when starting mutt-1.0pre2 I get the following error messages:
Fehler in /home/sf/.mutt/muttrc, Zeile 172: pgp_autoencrypt: Unbekannte Variable.
Fehler in /home/sf/.mutt/muttrc, Zeile 175: pgp_autosign: Unbekannte Variable.
Fehler in /home/sf/.mutt/muttrc, Zeile 178: pgp_default_version: Unb
On 09/Sep/1999, Marco Giardini wrote:
> color quoted9cyan default
> Running mutt i get the following error for every line containing the default color:
Maybe you compiled Mutt with ncurses? The "default" color only works if
compiled with Slang, AFAIK.
--
Robert
On 09/Sep/1999, Telsa wrote:
> What kind of Linux system do you (the original poster) have? I have
> Red Hat 6.0 and there is a default muttrc in /etc/Muttrc. Mutt reads
/etc/Muttrc? :-m Funny, I haven't realized I had one %-)
> Doesn't mutt come with a sample muttrc, then? If not, then
On 10/Sep/1999, Chris Green wrote:
> What I need is to be able to view my POP3 'folder' and delete
> individual messages. Most of the newer Unix/Linux MUAs do in fact
> work this way with POP3 folders, it makes them look just like ordinary
> local folders to the user. Using fetchmail with mutt
Stefan Fleiter [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> when starting mutt-1.0pre2 I get the following error messages:
>
> Error in /home/sf/.mutt/muttrc, Line xxx: pgp_xxx_xxx: Unknown option
>
> I use the international version (mutt-1.0pre2i.tar.gz) and studied
> the manual and the faq but didn´t find a
Stefan Fleiter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 10 Sep 1999:
> Error in /home/sf/.mutt/muttrc, Line xxx: pgp_xxx_xxx: Unknown option
I would guess that you have compiled Mutt without PGP support (maybe the
configure didn't auto-detect it or something..) You can verify this
from mutt -v outp
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 11:09:05PM +0200, Stefan Fleiter wrote:
> I use the international version (mutt-1.0pre2i.tar.gz) and studied
> the manual and the faq but didn´t find anything.
The configure script needs to find the PGP executables in order
to compile with PGP support. Check your PATH envi
Mutters,
When I pgp 6.5.1 a message from mutt and send it to myself, I get a
"bad signature". Huh? Bad sig from myself? I tried just checking my
signature from a few pgp signed text files and it was okay. Is there
anything in my .muttrc file that I need to check? Since pgp6.5.1 is
command lin
Hi Stefan!
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Stefan Fleiter wrote:
> when starting mutt-1.0pre2 I get the following error messages:
>
> Fehler in /home/sf/.mutt/muttrc, Zeile 172: pgp_autoencrypt:
> +Unbekannte Variable.
> Fehler in /home/sf/.mutt/muttrc, Zeile 175:
> +pgp_autosign: Unbekannte Variable.
Thanks for the responses to my question. Now that I see them I feel
kind of stupid, but I realize that I actually didn't explain well. I
was also thinking of wanting to email a highlighted block of test.
Eric Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> replied to me with exactly what I was
looking for:
> :!mutt
25 matches
Mail list logo
