Hi folks,
Alec Habig (Thanks Alec!) just notified me of a bug my source rpms
for mutt-0.95.7i and mutt-1.0pre1: When rebulding the SRPM, it might
overwrite files in /usr/share/mutt on the life file system. I hope to get
round to fix that today or tomorrow (watch this space! ;-) ), but I
thought I
Problem:
ehswolm@vksun25:~/mutt-1.0pre1>make install
Making install in doc
.
.
.
Making install in charsets
cd . && sh ./gen_charsets
./../mkinstalldirs /home/5/ehswolm/share/mutt/charsets
( cd . && for f in `cat charsets.list` ; do .././install-sh -c \
-m 644 $f /home/5/ehswolm/share/mut
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 01:35:09AM +0100 or thereabouts, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> Folks, this is happening too fast... ;-)
:)
> Anyway, the new RPMs are finished and available (as usual) at:
> http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan/tuxior.html
> Maybe this time I get round to upload them to incoming.re
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 11:09:55AM +0100, Telsa wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 01:35:09AM +0100 or thereabouts, Thomas Ribbrock wrote:
> > Folks, this is happening too fast... ;-)
>
> :)
>
> > Anyway, the new RPMs are finished and available (as usual) at:
> > http://www.bigfoot.com/~kaytan/tu
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 12:20:30PM +0200, Peter van Dijk thus spoke:
> ftp.replay.com is hosted in The Netherlands, which means it can indeed have
> all kinds of crypto stuff. It's where I go when I need ssh stuff :)
There is no actual crypto shipped in mutt, so the only "problem" is RH
being fin
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> There is no actual crypto shipped in mutt, so the only "problem" is RH
> being finicky about "i" versions on their site, from what I can see. :/
Nope. Even the hooks for PGP/strong crypto are illegal to export.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt <
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 03:00:04PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt thus spoke:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
>
> > There is no actual crypto shipped in mutt, so the only "problem" is RH
> > being finicky about "i" versions on their site, from what I can see. :/
>
> Nope.
Thanks, these are good things. Seems like the .txt and .txt.gz links point
to the same (ungzipped) text file, though...
One other thought: am I the only one out there who likes "text" and/or
".txt" files to mean "plain text" (i.e., with ASCII codes >= 0x20, except
for whitespace encodings)?
I'm
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Erik Jacobsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| One other thought: am I the only one out there who likes "text" and/or
| ".txt" files to mean "plain text" (i.e., with ASCII codes >= 0x20, except
| for whitespace encodings)?
Yes indeed (or, to avoid confusion, "me too").
Also, N
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 07:42:41AM -0600, Kim DeVaughn wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Erik Jacobsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> |
> | One other thought: am I the only one out there who likes "text" and/or
> | ".txt" files to mean "plain text" (i.e., with ASCII codes >= 0x20, except
> | for whitesp
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Peter van Dijk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 07:42:41AM -0600, Kim DeVaughn stupidly said:
| >
| > Also, NO chars >= 0x3F, please ...!
|
| I think you mean 0x7F.
Duh. Of course that's what I meant ...!
Thanks for catching that.
/kim (who shouldn't
Hi,
SGI's cc tends to be pretty picky, and it doesn't like you to declare
strings with "char blah[]" and initialize it at the same time. I have
no idea why, but it bombs when it sees this.
Luckily, "char * blah" works just fine and means the same thing. So,
the attached patch allows people to
Gee, and you call mutt configurable? :) :) *chuckle* Just kidding, but
one question...
Seriously...there's one thing that I -can't- seem to find to reconfigure,
ant that's the "-- Forwarded message by" ...or however it reads, when you
forward a message.
You can change the Subject header's
Erik Jacobsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm always having to get rid of the ^Hs by piping the distribution's
> manual.txt through "col -b" (or s/(\S\010)//g for perl people :)
I use "less" to read text files, and it does a fine job of translating
those backspaces into nice bold and underline
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 11:48:34AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> Seriously...there's one thing that I -can't- seem to find to reconfigure,
> ant that's the "-- Forwarded message by" ...or however it reads, when you
> forward a message.
You can configure it within your editor by substituting
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 11:02:45AM +1000, Shao Zhang wrote:
> When I send attachments to someone else. If they use mutt to
> save the attachments, then it is fine. But if they use pine to
> save it, then pine does not give a default file name. Many
> people have complained
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 07:07:11PM +0200, Gero Treuner thus spoke:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 11:48:34AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> > Seriously...there's one thing that I -can't- seem to find to reconfigure,
> > ant that's the "-- Forwarded message by" ...or however it reads, when you
>
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 11:45 AM, David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed:
> Of course, it's hard to put those nice highlights back again, if you
> take them out. Why not simply filter the file through "col -b" once,
> and save it that way on your system, so that you don't have to do it
> every
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 03:03:11PM -0400, Erik Jacobsen wrote:
> I use "less" too, but I still get stuff like:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- low traffic list for announcements
set the environment variable LESSCHARSET=latin1
--
Manoj Kasichainula - manojk at io dot com - http://www.io.com/~manoj
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 03:00:04PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> Nope. Even the hooks for PGP/strong crypto are illegal to export.
Could you please elaborate on that? I was wondering about that for a long
time now and I'd be grateful to get to know what exactly led to the split
between "mutt
Erik Jacobsen [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Thanks, these are good things. Seems like the .txt and .txt.gz links point
> to the same (ungzipped) text file, though...
This is a feature of your browser. It's gunzipping the file as it
downloads it. To just download it, use your browser's mechanism
Fairlight [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 03:00:04PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt thus spoke:
> > On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
> >
> > > There is no actual crypto shipped in mutt, so the only "problem" is RH
> > > being finicky about "i" versions on t
Thomas Ribbrock [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 03:00:04PM +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
>
> > Nope. Even the hooks for PGP/strong crypto are illegal to export.
>
> Could you please elaborate on that? I was wondering about that for a long
> time now and I'd be grateful to
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 03:33:24PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> See http://www.mozilla.org/crypto-faq.html, which includes links to the
> applicable legislation.
Thanks. Looks bleak, indeed.
However, just out of interest: Does anybody have links to the legislations?
All such links on the pa
Thomas Ribbrock [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 03:33:24PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> > See http://www.mozilla.org/crypto-faq.html, which includes links to the
> > applicable legislation.
>
> Thanks. Looks bleak, indeed.
>
> However, just out of interest: Does anybo
well, at the risk of getting a little too political, all you americans
on this list who feel that these encryption laws are inane should check
out this site: http://www.computerprivacy.com/. i question the
effectiveness of contacting legislators at all, but it's worth a shot.
pete
On Wed, 25 A
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 05:49:59PM -0400, Pete Toscano thus spoke:
> well, at the risk of getting a little too political, all you americans
> on this list who feel that these encryption laws are inane should check
> out this site: http://www.computerprivacy.com/. i question the
> effectiveness o
On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Fairlight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| But yeah...this is getting political. Sorry for raising the question...I
| should have just let Telsa's post alone (although I'm slightly less
| ignorant now, for having questioned it). Sorry to have troubled the rest
| of you with th
Kim DeVaughn [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999, Fairlight ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> |
> | But yeah...this is getting political. Sorry for raising the question...I
> | should have just let Telsa's post alone (although I'm slightly less
> | ignorant now, for having questioned it).
On Wednesday, 25 August 1999 at 15:00, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 1999 at 08:40:42AM -0400, Fairlight wrote:
>
> > There is no actual crypto shipped in mutt, so the only "problem" is RH
> > being finicky about "i" versions on their site, from what I can see. :/
>
> Nope. Even the
Hello,
I like that mutt has the ability to write to different folders on
an IMAP server, ie. {server}path/to/folder. Is it possible to
pipe a message to mutt from the command line, so that it writes
to a specified IMAP folder and then exits? If not, is there
generic program out there that will
Steve Talley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 25 Aug 1999:
> I like that mutt has the ability to write to different folders on
> an IMAP server, ie. {server}path/to/folder. Is it possible to
> pipe a message to mutt from the command line, so that it writes
> to a specified IMAP folder and then e
And another one...
ok, the bugs in the SRPM should be fixed by now.
For the time being, I decided to upload the RPMs to a NEW URL:
^^^
http://indigo.ie/~pumuckel/
^^^
List of RPMs (all for Red Hat Linux 5.2):
- m
At 18:16 -0500 25 Aug 1999, Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On another angle -- export to Canada is allowed, and Canada has very open
> crypto. Has anyone ever tried combining these two facts into something
> useful?
As I understand it Canadian law specifically disallows exporting of
34 matches
Mail list logo
