On 1999-08-01 15:50:29 -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> ObMutt: I still haven't found [what I consider to be] a graceful
> way to manage lots of various hooks for lots of various
> personalities; am I really the only one out there that has
> more than three or four email
On 1999-08-01 19:57:55 -0400, Matthew Cordes wrote:
> I have downloaded the mutt source, but cannot find the appropriate
> pgp6.5.1 patch. I was told that the cvs version included this
> support. the contrib directory contains patches for pgp2 and 5,
> but not 6. I have found a patch that i th
Hi folks,
I am successfully using mutt on AIX, with a strange problem though.
In intervals of exactly 5 seconds, mutt reports a "Key is not bound"-error, as if I
was pressing invalid keys but I am not. Annoyingly this is accompanied by a 'beep'
every time!
When I am supposed to enter text
When I run mutt I find myself looking at /var/spool/mail/edmund. I
can't delete anything because "Mailbox is read-only". Can someone tell
me what I should do? Should I arrange for mail to be transferred from
/var/spool/mail/edmund to somewhere else? How? Does mutt do this, or
some other program?
Edmund --
...and then Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS said...
% When I run mutt I find myself looking at /var/spool/mail/edmund. I
% can't delete anything because "Mailbox is read-only". Can someone tell
% me what I should do? Should I arrange for mail to be transferred from
% /var/spool/mail/edmund to some
Hi Edmund!
On Mon, 02 Aug 1999, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> $ ls -ld /var/spool/mail /var/spool/mail/edmund
> drwxrwxr-x 2 root mail 1024 Aug 2 14:15 /var/spool/mail
change the permissions, should be:
drwxrwsr-x 2 root mail 1024 Aug 2 16:54 /var/spool/mail
by .
Hi, folks --
...and then Stefan `Sec` Zehl said...
%
% > ObReq: It might be neat if mutt knew to look first in $HOME/.mutt
% > for a muttrc or .muttrc instead of my having to either source
% > that other copy by hand or patch the source code...
%
% Mutt does look for your muttr
Hi,
first of all, please adhere to that 70 characters/line limit mail
usually uses. I've take the freedom to reformat your mail.
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 12:44:38PM +0200, Peter Poeml wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I am successfully using mutt on AIX, with a strange problem though.
>
> In intervals o
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 05:20:32PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, please adhere to that 70 characters/line limit mail
> usually uses. I've take the freedom to reformat your mail.
Hi,
thank you very much for your help which solved the problem.
I just set the timeout to
When I run mutt I find myself looking at /var/spool/mail/edmund. I
can't delete anything because "Mailbox is read-only". Can someone tell
me what I should do? Should I arrange for mail to be transferred from
/var/spool/mail/edmund to somewhere else? How? Does mutt do this, or
some other program?
Peter --
...and then Peter Poeml said...
% On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 05:20:32PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
% > Hi,
% >
% > first of all, please adhere to that 70 characters/line limit mail
% > usually uses. I've take the freedom to reformat your mail.
%
% Regarding the 70 characters I am not
I get hundreds of email daily. Some get filtered via Procmail, but
others I usually tag manaully, save them off into a folder, then examine
them all separately. My incoming mailbox is pretty large (my fault),
and so navigating it to find my tagged messages is a bit cumbersome.
I'd like to see a
Eugene Lee [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I get hundreds of email daily. Some get filtered via Procmail, but
> others I usually tag manaully, save them off into a folder, then examine
> them all separately. My incoming mailbox is pretty large (my fault),
> and so navigating it to find my tagged me
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:51:35AM -0500, Eugene Lee wrote:
> Would it be possible to add a "next-tagged-message" function to Mutt?
In what way would this function differ from this macro:
macro index , ~T\n
?
CU,
Sec
--
stop reading here
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 10:24:16PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
:On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:51:35AM -0500, Eugene Lee wrote:
:>
:> Would it be possible to add a "next-tagged-message" function to Mutt?
:
:In what way would this function differ from this macro:
:
:macro index , ~T\n
It doesn't.
Hi mutt users...
I'm just starting to use maildir as my mailbox type. Now, whenever I got a
message in maildir, the mutt index page shows that the message is O bytes
in size. Is it the default behaviour or am I missing something here?
Thanks...
--
m4v3r1ck -- ICQ UIN #26095019
PGP signature
Hello,
I seem to be having some problems with Mutt and GPG on Solaris. Most likely
it is some configuration goof on my part. On my home Linux box, I don't
have any problems. My test is basically just trying to send encrypted
messages back and forth between work and home. On the work side it
m4v3r1ck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm just starting to use maildir as my mailbox type. Now, whenever I
> got a message in maildir, the mutt index page shows that the message
> is O bytes in size.
They're not 0 bytes, they're 0 *lines*. That is to say, the messages do
not have a Lines: he
I have this problem with saving tagged files. I have no problem
tagging a file. When I hit 't' it tags the message. But when I hit 's' to
save the tagged messages, it only saves the current message. What I want
to do is save a bunch of files I've tagged, instead of hitting 's' at each
o
Is there a way so that I can keep my mailboxes compressed (say with gzip) and
whenever I access the mailboxes, they would be ungzipped, do whatever I want,
then regzipped? Maybe a hook or something?
--
Azeem Jiva [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.csc.calpoly.edu/~ajiva
"It is better to sit alone
I'm having troubles with tagging. Well not actaully. I'm having
troubles saving my tagged files. When I tag a bunch of messages, then
hit 's'. It just saves the current message. not all my tagged
messages.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I have this problem with saving tagged files. I have no problem
> tagging a file. When I hit 't' it tags the message. But when I hit 's' to
> save the tagged messages, it only saves the current message. What I want
> to do is save a bunch of
Azeem Shahjahan Jiva [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Is there a way so that I can keep my mailboxes compressed (say with gzip) and
> whenever I access the mailboxes, they would be ungzipped, do whatever I want,
> then regzipped? Maybe a hook or something?
See the compressed folders patch info at ht
Answer use ';s'. That a semicolon.
Original message:
I have this problem with saving tagged files. I have no problem
tagging a file. When I hit 't' it tags the message. But when I hit 's' to
save the tagged messages, it only saves the current message. What I want
to do is save a bunc
On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 03:50:53PM -0700, Jonathan Loh wrote:
:
:I'm having troubles with tagging. Well not actaully. I'm having
:troubles saving my tagged files. When I tag a bunch of messages, then
:hit 's'. It just saves the current message. not all my tagged
:messages.
Jeremy Blosser
David Thorburn-Gundlach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> % When I run mutt I find myself looking at /var/spool/mail/edmund. I
> % can't delete anything because "Mailbox is read-only". Can someone tell
> % me what I should do? Should I arrange for mail to be transferred from
> % /var/spool/mail/edmund
> Mutt 0.95.6i (1999-06-03)
> gpg (GnuPG) 0.9.9a-snap1999-07-28
I think that version of mutt still expects gpgm, the features of which
got rolled into gpg itself somewhere in the 0.9 sequence. Try making
gpgm a symlink to gpg.
Brian
27 matches
Mail list logo
