Moritz Moeller-Herrmann hat ueber "Re: netscape and mutt" geschrieben:
> Would you be able to provide an adapted version for mutt? I don't know C and my
> version segfaults Netscape, whenever I try it.
I had the same problem with my netscape4.5 on my linux-box.
all was correctly set up, the pat
Bevan Broun hat ueber "Re: limit question" geschrieben:
> > Odd. I always just "l all".
>
> "l *" is shorter.
But it shows me, that all messages are limited. And when using "l all"
I get the normal state back, i.e. unlimit
Maybe you can map a "Esc-U" to "l all" or anything like that
bye
--
On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 22:13:08 -0400, David Thorburn-Gundlach wrote:
> [...] and then 'c'hange back to the same mailbox
> (if you use the patch from, um, either Byrial or Sec I think :-) then
> you can just 'c'hange to '^' in shorthand); it's faster than quitting
> and restarting mutt.
The patc
Thanks for advice, David!
> > * only mark as read when a command is given by the user
> > * mark a message as read when it's been viewed in the pager for
> > more than X seconds. (Just as an example, I would probably set
> > X to something rather large in fact, like a minute)
>
> The
Hi,
Im trying to switch to mutt, but im having some troubles getting IMAP
folders (UW server) to work. I have my inbox working ok by setting the
spoolfile to {server}INBOX. However, I cant get any of the other folders
to work that are located at {server}mail/folder. If I set the spoolfile
to {s
Rejo writes:
> ++ 16.04.1999, 17:09:54 (+0100) = Lars Hecking:
> > If you're not relying on any special mutt features you're probably better
> > off using /bin/mail or /bin/mailx instead or whatever your OS provides.
>
> Why is that? I have used this mutt consctruction myself a lot (i used it
> i
