On Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Christian R Molls wrote:
> Are there plans to incorporate the
>
> - compressed folders patch
> - lbdb
>
> into mutt? I guess quite a number of people will miss those two
> enhancements, and that is, at least IMO, a shame.
lbdb will never be incorporated into Mutt, because
When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within 1 second (or
actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it should abort because the message
is unmodified.
Greetz, Peter.
--
.| Peter van Dijk | stoned worden of coden
.| [EMAIL PROTECTED] | dat is de levens
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 04:27:37AM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> I didn't hear that someone except me is using this patch, so
> I fear that nobody needs it and wants it. But maybe this only means
I know at least 3 persons (includes me) who use this patch.
It's VERY usefull under Solaris,
the 'a' key makes it possible to create an alias based on the From header. Is
there any way for mutt to take addresses from a group message (i.e. including
the To and Cc fields, and if possible removing my own address) to create a
list alias, rather than picking all addresses manually?
TIA
--
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:04:17 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within 1 second (or
> actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it should abort because the message
> is unmodified.
I have a patch called patch-0.95.3.bj.ed_mtime
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Renaud Colinet wrote:
> the 'a' key makes it possible to create an alias based on the From
> header. Is there any way for mutt to take addresses from a group
> message (i.e. including the To and Cc fields, and if possible
> removing my own address) to create a list alias, rat
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=FCuugMFkClbJLl1L; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:57:54AM +0200, Stefan Leupers wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:04:17AM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
>
> > When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within
> > 1 second (or actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it
> > should abort becau
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=7iMSBzlTiPOCCT2k; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 12:06:55PM +0200, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 10:04:17 +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > When replying to a message, after entering vi, when doing :wq within 1 second (or
> > actually in the same second, I think) mutt thinks it should abort because the
>m
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 04:27:37AM +0200, Roland Rosenfeld wrote
> sources. I didn't hear that someone except me is using this patch, so
> I fear that nobody needs it and wants it. But maybe this only means
I am using it, and it works fine for me and others here.
I wrote a mail to mutt-user
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999, Roland Rosenfeld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| The compressed folders patch is a bigger problem. The patch works but
| it isn't checked against all possible problems. Additionally it is not
| programmed very clean. So Thomas seems to be waiting for someone
| cleaning up the s
Hello Mutts,
I noticed that if one's current dir does not exist (ie. remove an interactive
shell's CWD in another shell), mutt will only open the user's mailbox(es)
read-only -- regardless of the directory in question. Why would this be the
case if '.' is not a meaningful dir to mutt?
To be tho
On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> lbdb will never be incorporated into Mutt, because it is a separate
> package which can be used by Mutt using a clear interface. So it
> shouldn't be a problem to combine Mutt and lbdb. For new versions of
> lbdb see http://www.spinnaker.de/debian/#l
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 02:36:30PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> I don't like to wait for a second there. Since I'm also a subscription
> moderator, I get 5-6 of these mails a day and growing..
You obviously need a slower computer. On my box starting and quitting my
editor takes longer so I neve
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=UK1lfQXsnwKrySH9; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=NBQMqqtZQBFxm+aD; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 09:22:09PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 02:36:30PM +0200, Peter van Dijk wrote:
> > I don't like to wait for a second there. Since I'm also a subscription
> > moderator, I get 5-6 of these mails a day and growing..
>
> You obviously need a slow
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=aM3YZ0Iwxop3KEKx; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
21 matches
Mail list logo
