On Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Roland Rosenfeld wrote:
> lbdb will never be incorporated into Mutt, because it is a separate
> package which can be used by Mutt using a clear interface. So it
> shouldn't be a problem to combine Mutt and lbdb. For new versions of
> lbdb see http://www.spinnaker.de/debian/#lbdb (you'll also find system
> independent sources there).
I actually got it there and it works great (that was the reason for
my question). As a former pine user, I missed the Take-Address
feature in mutt, and lbdb is more than a replacement for it.
> sources. I didn't hear that someone except me is using this patch, so
> I fear that nobody needs it and wants it. But maybe this only means
> that there are no problems with this patch? In the latter case the
> patch should be incorporated now. This shouldn't be a big problem,
I'm using it (ok, not for too long, but with really large folders) and
it runs very smoothly. For those archiving their mailing lists, folder
compression is -at least- nice to have.
Putting some kind of "enable at your own risk" into the sources should
be enough to keep it away from the careful.
--
Christian Molls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
student of laws [EMAIL PROTECTED]
univ of cologne
