On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:16:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> does gpg work in place of pgp for mutt use?
Yes. (Though you need to build mutt to recognize it.)
> how good is gpg?
On systems with /dev/random (ie, Linux and some of the BSDs), it's
great. On lesser systems, it needs som
On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 08:58:05PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> You can change the background color using the color object 'tilde', and can
> make the background transparent by setting the color as 'default', eg:
>
> color tilde brightblack default
>
> You can turn it off using 'unset tilde'
I could do it from the command line or within mutt.
I'm using version 0.95.3us.
On Mon, Mar 08, 1999 at 07:09:13PM -0800, David Ellement wrote:
> On 990308, at 18:50:28, The Beast from the East wrote:
> > Did you set the "record" variable? This variable has no default
> > so you may have to set
According to Robert Chien:
> Don't know how to fix it though, I had to apply the patch manually
> (luckily, it was a short one :). I'm not a developer, but I would
> certainly like to know the solution as well.
Can you do a "ident" or "what" on your patch binary ? I wonder which
version of patch
Rejo dixit:
> ++ 12.03.1999, 17:45:14 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >I most times see pgp signed messages as an attachment in mutt, though others
> >I see the signatures in the body of the messages. Why and how's this
> >difference? How can one and another been achieved?
>
> This is because th
Hi
I want threads to be my default mailbox sorting method.
Now, I need to go `s' then `t' to initialise it or
`: source .muttrc' but my .muttrc should be initialised already as I have
all the other settings as soon as I start up mutt.
here is a :r !grep sort .muttrc
set sort=threads
On Sat, 13 Mar 1999, Matt Beauregard wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 1999 at 08:58:05PM -0500, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > You can change the background color using the color object 'tilde', and can
> > make the background transparent by setting the color as 'default', eg:
> >
> > color tilde brightblack
++ 13.03.1999, 14:09:06 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>I don't know if what you suggest would fiddle with the signature and then
>produce a bad sig. Is there no other way to choose between an attached
>signature and a text signed message with mutt?
No, it wouldn't produce a bad signature. You can
Ken W writes:
> Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I
> have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I
> run 'patch < ' I get the following:
>
> The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> The next patch looks like a unified contex
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote:
> Hi, I am trying to patch mutt on a new system witht he same patches I
> have always used on BSD systems, but this system is Solaris. When I
> run 'patch < ' I get the following:
> The next patch looks like a unified context diff.
> The
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 03:34:37PM +, Steve Kennedy wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 05:08:54PM -0500, Ken W wrote:
> > I can't seem to find a patch in there anywhere.
> > Anyone know what the problem is?
> Solaris has it's own 'patch' which is not Larry Wall's patch.
Sorry, further on thi
hi,
how can i have a send-hook -like function that will be called *after*
i compose a message? i want to post-process a message after i compose
it, but i couldn't find a function to do it, since send-hook happens
before you compose the body. this would be analogous to a sending
filter in pine, e
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 11:32:28AM -0800, Brandon Long wrote:
> On 03/12/99 David DeSimone uttered the following other thing:
> > Daniel Brahneborg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > So, what is the syntax for imap subfolders?
> >
> > {server.name}subfolder_name
>
> And if you want to se
At 8:09 AM EST on March 13 [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent off:
> Please, could anyone send to me the variables that need to be added in
> ~/.muttrc for mutt-i to work with pgp versions 2.6.3i and 5.0i, and with gpg
> altogether? (or, a muttrc file with all of them)
I recommend you look at Roland Rosenf
Can someone tell me where sendmail picks up the SENDER name when using
mutt? ie how does sendmail resolve the $x macro?
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk
I've been using elm for OS/2 for several years, and would like to
convert over to mutt, but can't seem to get my mail headers formatte
how does one configure mutt to use gpg? simply use the pgp variables and
guess which ones relate to gpg? is there a doc on this somewhere? the
manual doesn't say much about this...
thanks,
--
brian kowolowski
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999, john manoogian III ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
|
| how can i have a send-hook -like function that will be called *after*
| i compose a message? i want to post-process a message after i compose
| it, but i couldn't find a function to do it, since send-hook happens
| before you c
On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 12:21:05 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If you are using a non-standard ispell which does NOT accept '-x', you
> > can always 'set ispell=/path/to/ispell' in your muttrc.
>
> No you can't, because it's hard-coded in the so
On Sat, Mar 13, 1999 at 09:10:53AM +0100, Byrial Jensen wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 1999 at 12:21:05 -0600, David DeSimone wrote:
> > Vikas Agnihotri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > If you are using a non-standard ispell which does NOT
> > > accept '-x', you can always 'set ispell=/path/to/isp
Warning
Could not process message with given Content-Type:
multipart/signed; boundary=VS++wcV0S1rZb1Fb; micalg=pgp-md5;protocol="application/pgp-signature"
I put the attached little script together to provide an easy way to
decode and view the X-Face: attachments that are frequently included
in e-mail headers. Now I can just pipe an X-Face-equiped mail message
into the showface script to see who sent me e-mail. The showface
script will extract the
Thank you all for the responses. The GNU patch did indeed work.
-Ken
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]AIM: ScopusFest
22 matches
Mail list logo
