++ 13.03.1999, 14:09:06 (+0100) = [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>I don't know if what you suggest would fiddle with the signature and then
>produce a bad sig. Is there no other way to choose between an attached
>signature and a text signed message with mutt?
No, it wouldn't produce a bad signature. You can sign any text you want.
You'll have to give 'pgp -sa file' command (when using 2.6.3) and it'll
sign this file. You can insert this file in the message you want to sent
and there will no problems [1]. Anyone with pgp can check this
signature.
But again, for creating non-MIME messages with a signed body (and
therefor having the signature and the signed text in one part) you'll
have to do it yourself manually...
Someone correct me if i'm wrong. I haven't been using Mutt for a long
time... -Rejo.
[1] The signature will be correct. However, if the reciepent is using
Mutt as well, Mutt will not recognize this signature unless (s)he is
using a procmail filter to add the missing headers (the headers MIME
uses to tell that the next part is signed).
--
= SISTER RAY [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] / REJO [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
= PGP: DSS B20D35F8, RSA FAE40065; finger [EMAIL PROTECTED], keyservers
= Subscribe to Live & Local, more info at http://mediaport.org/~sister
