* John Haviland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-19 00:46 (CEST)]
> My question is this - can I use uuencode to send an attachment
> that mutt will see as an attachment without requiring the
> uudecode.
Is there any special reason tu use the 'outdated' uudecode?
Why not using the base64, which seems
Hi,
* John Haviland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> When I use uuencode (uuencode somefile somefile2 | mail address) it comes
> across as an attachment in outlook but not in mutt.
This is because Outlook means to know it better and interprets the
begin file as an atachment.
Realy it is no atta
When I use uuencode (uuencode somefile somefile2 | mail address) it comes
across as an attachment in outlook but not in mutt. When I send an
attachment from mutt to mutt (or outlook to mutt) it comes in as an
attachment that doesn't require uudecode. I know that I can save the encoded
version from
