Hi, * John Haviland ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > When I use uuencode (uuencode somefile somefile2 | mail address) it comes > across as an attachment in outlook but not in mutt.
This is because Outlook means to know it better and interprets the begin file.... as an atachment. Realy it is no attachment. It is simply an encodet file, for mutt nothing else then normal text. So mutt does not display it as an attachment. > When I send an > attachment from mutt to mutt (or outlook to mutt) it comes in as an > attachment that doesn't require uudecode. This is because it is a correct mime-attachment. With all the headers and so. > My question is this - can I use > uuencode to send an attachment that mutt will see as an attachment without > requiring the uudecode. AFAIK no. You should use mutt -a <file> to send attachments from commandline. HTH & HAND sascha sorry for my english ;) -- Fuer einen neuen Monitor bitte hier ==>[X]<== einen Nagel einschlagen.
msg31891/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
