On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 07:25:34PM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> * Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [140708, 01:29]:
> > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> > > I've never used it, so I cannot give you first hand info. Did you
> > > follow thw instructions laid out in 'man mu
* Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [140708, 01:29]:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> > I've never used it, so I cannot give you first hand info. Did you
> > follow thw instructions laid out in 'man muttrc'? i.e.:
> >
> > --- quote ---
> > [...]
> >fcc-save
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> I've never used it, so I cannot give you first hand info. Did you
> follow thw instructions laid out in 'man muttrc'? i.e.:
>
> --- quote ---
>
>fcc-hook [!]pattern filename
> When an outgoing message matches patt
On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [110708, 01:53]:
> > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> > > fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Mail/Sent/Test # nasr.. being my _From_
> > > address
> > >
> > > worked for me! Note that writing it
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [110708, 01:53]:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> > fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Mail/Sent/Test # nasr.. being my _From_
> > address
> >
> > worked for me! Note that writing it as:
> > fcc-hook From: nasr ...
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 08:54:37PM -0400, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> the syntax you present is *not* as the example provided.
>
> yours: fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.mutt/record/uab
>
> fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +record/uab
>
> try it and see as I did not.
Thanks for the message! Although I w
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-10-08 19:58]:
>
> With these configuration lines:
> set postponed=~/.mutt/postponed
> fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/.mutt/record/uab
>
> After composing a message I get:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> fcc-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/Mail/Sent/Test # nasr.. being my _From_ address
>
> worked for me! Note that writing it as:
> fcc-hook From: nasr ...
> will produce an error, and putting quotes like 'From: nasr ..' saves the
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [100708, 03:13]:
> > I have also been playing with fcc-hook. I am wondering if
> > there is a similar functionality allowing to save messages (override the
> > $record variable) depending on the sen
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [100708, 21:55]:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [100708, 03:13]:
> [...]
> I have been able to save messages depending on the 'To:' field with
> fcc-hook. For example:
> fcc-hook [EMAI
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 11:22:33AM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [100708, 03:13]:
> > I have also been playing with fcc-hook. I am wondering if
> > there is a similar functionality allowing to save messages (override the
> > $record variable) depending on the sen
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [100708, 03:13]:
> I am new to mutt and I am very much enjoying configuring it and
> exploring its functionalities. I have seen this message on send-hook:
> > ...
> I have also been playing with fcc-hook. I am wondering if
> there is a similar functionality
I am new to mutt and I am very much enjoying configuring it and
exploring its functionalities. I have seen this message on send-hook:
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 04:46:41PM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> From: Patrick Shanahan
> send-hook majordomo 'my_hdr From: Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
>
> loo
* Patrick Shanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [090708, 15:04]:
> * Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-09-08 14:19]:
> > Patrick,
> > I'm very sorry for that. AAMOF all messages from the list are going to
> > my /dev/null, despite having put an exception for them in .procmailrc:
> > [...]
> > Are your messa
* Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-09-08 14:19]:
> Patrick,
> I'm very sorry for that. AAMOF all messages from the list are going to
> my /dev/null, despite having put an exception for them in .procmailrc:
>
> :0
> ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> $DEFAULT
expand $DEFAULT and show where it is defined
>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 08:17:35PM +0200, Ennio-Sr wrote:
> [OT OT]
> >> ps: your quoting style puts a great burden on anyone trying to answer
> >> your questions and present an easily understood text.
> Patrick,
> I'm very sorry for that. AAMOF all messages from the list are going to
> my /dev/nul
In reply-to Patrick Shanahan
who on 2008-07-09 15:06:39
Message-ID: 20080709150639.GQ22932 () wahoo ! no-ip ! org
said:
> Before I give definitely up, could you please confirm that I'm wright
> in assuming that send-hook should work (i.e. change headers) for
> messages being sent and the chan
* Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-09-08 10:47]:
>> From: Patrick Shanahan
>>
>> end-hook majordomo 'my_hdr From: Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>'
>>
>> oose the '~t '
>>
>> end-hook matches on a pattern existing in the "To:" address, the flag
>> s confusing it and quote marks should only
Sorry Patrick, I didn't see your message until to-day, looking in the
archives [may be posts sent to the list are being filtered by my
anti-spam]
---
From: Patrick Shanahan
Date: 2008-07-06 20:36:50
Message-ID: 20080706203650.GD22932 () wahoo ! no-ip ! org
[Download me
* Ennio-Sr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [07-06-08 16:18]:
>
> Despite various attempts to set different _From_ addresses and/or
> signatures according to the ML I'm writing to I always end up with the
> same result: the _send-hook_ will only work for replies to messages
> coming from a particular list but
Hi all!
although I've been using mutt under GNU/Linux for a few years now, I've
just subscribed to the list and this is my first post.
Despite various attempts to set different _From_ addresses and/or
signatures according to the ML I'm writing to I always end up with the
same result: the _send-ho
21 matches
Mail list logo
