In reply-to Patrick Shanahan <ptilopteri () gmail ! com> who on 2008-07-09 15:06:39 Message-ID: 20080709150639.GQ22932 () wahoo ! no-ip ! org said:
> Before I give definitely up, could you please confirm that I'm wright > in assuming that send-hook should work (i.e. change headers) for > messages being sent and the change should occur as the message is > being composed, as soon as the _To:_ field is filled with the > particular address? >> aiui, but *only* when you first start a new message. It would not set >> the "From:" addr if you edited the header "To:" field after a message >> is open/started. I believe send2-hook is for that. >> you might try with a .muttrc containing *only* your send-hooks to >> confirm that something else is not affecting >> mutt <to-addr> -F ~/<special-muttrc> >> [...] Ohhh! finally some light ;-). While I was trying what you suggested I realized that the trick for making send-hook work was simply to start mutt with the <To-addr>, like, for example: $ mutt muttus where _muttus_ is an alias for <mutt-users@mutt.org> and, of course, there is a send-hook mutt-users@mutt.org in .muttrc Instead, if I start mutt to read incoming messages and press 'm' to compose a new messages, there is no way to get the correct result, even changing to _send2-hook_. BTW, I've been reading manual and many posts on the subject but did never never notice anything to this respect! ;( -------------- [OT OT] >> ps: your quoting style puts a great burden on anyone trying to answer >> your questions and present an easily understood text. Patrick, I'm very sorry for that. AAMOF all messages from the list are going to my /dev/null, despite having put an exception for them in .procmailrc: :0 ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] $DEFAULT and I'm copying them from mutt archives. Are your messages 'plain/text' or html? -- [Why use Win$ozz (I say) if ... "even a fool can do that. \\?// Do something you aren't good at!" (as Henry Miller used to say)] (°|°) Regards, Ennio. --> Please replace '.' for '_dot_' in my Reply-To. )=(
