On Sat, Feb 10 2007 16:20, Travis H. wrote:
> Anyone have any thoughts on the wisdom of this?
>
> Also, is there a canonical naming scheme? I use a leading period
> for mailboxes that don't receive new mail (i.e. my outbox and
> spam folders)... But I see Maildir++ uses those for subfolders,
> an
So...
I was just reading the Maildir++ spec and it mentioned that it
supports subfolders. This is strange, as I have mutt using
subfolders with vanilla Maildir. I'm using the following
commands to automatically generate the mailbox list:
echo '# Autogenerated by $HOME/bin/mailboxes' > $HOME/.mu
