Re: send-hook and setting To: header

2002-04-04 Thread David T-G
Eugene -- ...and then Eugene Lee said... % % On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:22:51PM -0500, David T-G wrote: % : % : Were I you I'd have procmail recognize messages to/from B and rewrite it % : as to/from A so that mutt just knows about A. % % Yup, that's easy enough for a single email address. Bu

Re: send-hook and setting To: header

2002-04-04 Thread Eugene Lee
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 05:22:51PM -0500, David T-G wrote: : : Were I you I'd have procmail recognize messages to/from B and rewrite it : as to/from A so that mutt just knows about A. Yup, that's easy enough for a single email address. But I've not figured out how to do so while preserving mult

Re: send-hook and setting To: header

2002-04-04 Thread David T-G
Eugene -- ...and then Eugene Lee said... % % On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:00:40PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: % : % : Eugene Lee wrote: % : > ... % : > are fine and can be left alone. I'm guessing a send-hook will work, but % : > I haven't been able to divinate the right combination. % : % :

Re: send-hook and setting To: header

2002-04-04 Thread Eugene Lee
On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:00:40PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote: : : Eugene Lee wrote: : > : > I'd like to change this slightly. On messages sent to the mailing list : > via the alternate address B, I want 'L' to generate the headers using : > the main address A, i.e. "To: ". Messages sent to t

Re: PGP Signing and Password (not at all "send-hook and setting To: header")

2002-04-04 Thread David T-G
Dean -- First, I must note that you shouldn't just reply to any old message and start a new thread. This has nothing to do with hooks or even any prior musings. ...and then [EMAIL PROTECTED] said... % % Hi all Hello! % % I have just got GNUPG working with Mutt, and since I am still new to

Re: send-hook and setting To: header

2002-04-04 Thread Michael Elkins
Eugene Lee wrote: > I'd like to change this slightly. On messages sent to the mailing list > via the alternate address B, I want 'L' to generate the headers using > the main address A, i.e. "To: ". Messages sent to the main address A > are fine and can be left alone. I'm guessing a send-hook wi

send-hook and setting To: header

2002-04-04 Thread Eugene Lee
I'm on a mailing list with an email address of A. The same mailing list also works with an alternate email address of B. Both addresses are listed in the "lists" command. And doing 'L' (list-reply) generates the appropriate "To: " or "To: " headers. I'd like to change this slightly. On messag