Re: Folder specific mailing, smart fcc-save-hooks, question.

2002-10-05 Thread Rafael C. Gawenda
* Ryan Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-04 14:47 (13:28:38)] > for i in $(ls $1);do\ > Now the question: Can I make these all case insensitive? For > instance right now things to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > [EMAIL PROTECTED] are all treated differently, so with a mail sent

Folder specific mailing, smart fcc-save-hooks, question.

2002-10-04 Thread Ryan Sorensen
...) apex:~/.Mail/lists$ ls [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]/ I also have save hooks to save to the email address of the sender, and save sent messages to that folder, if it exists. [ed note: appended on bottom] What you want is here: # These use macros to specify a default

Re: Automatic save-hooks?

2002-08-04 Thread David Champion
* On 2002.08.03, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, * "Chris Stork" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Problem: I handed out loads of addresses of the form > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to automatically save > emails to this address to =SENDERSPECIFIC, where "automatically" means > that I don't want to put

Re: Automatic save-hooks? -> procmail

2002-08-03 Thread Rob 'Feztaa' Park
--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alas! Chris Stork spake thus: > (I use procmail already to filter my mail. But the emails I'm talking > about arrive rarely and I could miss them if they were pr

Re: Automatic save-hooks? -> procmail

2002-08-03 Thread Chris Stork
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 04:11:49AM +0200, Sven Guckes wrote: > * Chris Stork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-04 01:46]: > > Problem: I handed out loads of addresses of the form > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to automatically save > > emails to this address to =SENDERSPECIFIC, where "automatically"

Re: Automatic save-hooks? -> procmail

2002-08-03 Thread Sven Guckes
* Chris Stork <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-04 01:46]: > Problem: I handed out loads of addresses of the form > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to automatically save > emails to this address to =SENDERSPECIFIC, where "automatically" means > that I don't want to put a save-hook line into my muttrc file

Automatic save-hooks?

2002-08-03 Thread Chris Stork
Problem: I handed out loads of addresses of the form [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'd like to automatically save emails to this address to =SENDERSPECIFIC, where "automatically" means that I don't want to put a save-hook line into my muttrc file. I thought about using message-hook to somehow call save-hoo

Re: Minor annoyance with fcc-save-hooks

2002-07-04 Thread Rocco Rutte
Hi, * Lars Becker [02-07-02 19:21:12 +0200] wrote: > I know it's possible to reach my goal if i use save-hooks > and fcc-hooks instead of fcc-save-hooks. The disadvantage > of this is clear: i (and any other mutt user) will have to > set two hooks for every corresponde

Minor annoyance with fcc-save-hooks

2002-07-02 Thread Lars Becker
Hi all, i've set up a lot of fcc-save-hooks to set the default folders for certain people ("~L pattern folder"). This works quite good if there's only one recipient in the headers or one person to whom i send mail. If there are many recipients in the headers or me doing a g

Re: matching fcc-save-hooks

2001-08-13 Thread David Ellement
MAIL PROTECTED] | ~f [EMAIL PROTECTED] =".Clients.CompanyX.People.joe >bob" > > I don't imagine this works, right? > > fcc-save-hook ~(t|f) [EMAIL PROTECTED] =".Clients.CompanyX.People.joe bob" I've found it convenient to redefine default_hook b

matching fcc-save-hooks

2001-08-13 Thread Jean-Sebastien Morisset
I use fcc-save-hooks like: fcc-save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] =".Clients.CompanyX.People.joe bob" I'd like to limit matches to the To: and From: fields, skipping the Cc: and Bcc: fields. I figure the following would probably work, but is there a more elegant (i.e. less redundant) me

Re: save-hooks

2000-05-01 Thread Mikko Hänninen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 01 May 2000: > while mbox-hooks can save read messages automatically > for save-hooks to work you have to be MANUALLY saving a message > (given a matching regexp or pattern, of course) > > is that correct? Yes, it is. Y

save-hooks

2000-05-01 Thread indy
stupid question of the day: while mbox-hooks can save read messages automatically for save-hooks to work you have to be MANUALLY saving a message (given a matching regexp or pattern, of course) is that correct? -Marcos -- "Give me a ping Vasilij. One ping only, please." "Aye captain."

Re: save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-17 Thread Greg Matheson
d be %O, of course. I didn't know these sequences could be used for things other than screen formatting. Then, quoting the manual, I thought, unlike mbox-hooks, all the save-hooks in .muttrc are evaluated. In fact, for both, the first one that matches is used, isn't it. So default m

Re: save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-16 Thread Greg Matheson
l folders that cramps my mail-handling style! Incidentally, the manual says about mbox-hooks, Unlike some of the other hook commands, only the first matching pattern is used (it is not possible to save read mail in more than a single mailbox). But, isn't this true about save-ho

Re: save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-15 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Duncan Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 12 Apr 2000: > > fcc-save-hook . "set save_name=+%o" > > fcc-save-hook @ncube.com "set save_name=+ncube/%o" > > I finally got around to trying this and when I try the above commands or > varients I get the following. > > hook: fcc-hook @ncube.

Re: save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-12 Thread Duncan Watson
On Wed, Apr 05, 2000 at 01:00:33AM -0400, David T-G wrote: > Duncan -- > > The short answer to your first question (how to change $folder or, > actually $save_name) is that a few people have asked about it a few times > without getting a great answer, and I'm extremely interested in getting > it

Re: save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-05 Thread Mikko Hänninen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 04 Apr 2000: > 2) have a default fcc when replying to domain ncube.com of both > +outgoing and +ncube/ As far as I know, there's no way in Mutt to do a Fcc into more than one folder at a time. :-( David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro

Re: save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-05 Thread Ola Nyström
On Tue, 04 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Second problem is OT. I want to have something check for new mail besides > mutt. I use maildirs work computer and so don't worry about the notifiers > destroying info that mutt wants. Does anyone have new mail notifiers that run > under X that w

Re: save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-04 Thread David T-G
Duncan -- The short answer to your first question (how to change $folder or, actually $save_name) is that a few people have asked about it a few times without getting a great answer, and I'm extremely interested in getting it working. I think that some hooks about like fcc-save-hook . "set sa

save-hooks? and mail notifiers

2000-04-04 Thread climer
Hello all, I am trying to accomplish a number of things at once. I like to sort mail from my co-workers into individual folders after I read it and deal with it. I currently do this by tagging messages and using the default save folder. Works great. What I want to do is: 1) match on th

Re: save hooks

1999-08-27 Thread Mikko Hänninen
erik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Aug 1999: > i want to have save hooks set up so that if i recive > an email from a certain person, when i go to save it, it goes in a > cetain mailbox, and if it is from someone else, it will go in another > one. Read the section in the

save hooks

1999-08-27 Thread erik
hi, this is probably a really easy question, but apparently i still cant figure it out. i want to have save hooks set up so that if i recive an email from a certain person, when i go to save it, it goes in a cetain mailbox, and if it is from someone else, it will go in another one. I dont mean

Re: save-hooks

1999-07-14 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Brian -- ...and then Brian B. said... % % I recive mail from a List and from an individual on a list is there either a % way to write a save hook like It's mutt, so there is almost certainly a way. Your example was a bit vague, though; try again with something a little more concrete and we'll

save-hooks

1999-07-13 Thread Brian B.
I recive mail from a List and from an individual on a list is there either a way to write a save hook like from user ;to group save this folder from user save this folder from group save this folder or If mail is in this folder save to this folder regardless

Using save-hooks

1999-04-14 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Hello, I have a question about save-hooks. Up until now I'd been assuming that they work just like all (most of) the other hooks and that you can specify the usual regular expressions and patterns like in other parts. But, according to the manual, you can only specify one regular expre

Re: save hooks

1999-01-22 Thread Gero Treuner
On Thu, Jan 21, 1999 at 04:22:10AM -0600, Brian Bray wrote: > whats wrong with this i got it and modified it from one of the mutt pages > > save-hook mutt-users@ +mutt-users-save Hm, the manual says that the pattern is used against the From: address, which usually is not [EMAIL PROTECTED] . How

save hooks

1999-01-21 Thread Brian Bray
whats wrong with this i got it and modified it from one of the mutt pages save-hook mutt-users@ +mutt-users-save