On 22Oct2020 13:08, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>On 29Jul2020 09:13, Cameron Simpson wrote:
>>On 28Jul2020 13:27, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote:
>>>I don't know if this helps, but have you tried a format pipe *just* in
>>>one of the index-format-hook with %f and using the script to extract
>>>the name part
ing which accesses the "raw" full name
>>>from the message header instead of the name from $reverse_alias.
>>>
>>>Is this possible, one way or another?
>>
>>I don't know if this helps, but have you tried a format pipe *just* in
>>one of th
m the message header instead of the name from $reverse_alias.
>>
>>Is this possible, one way or another?
>
>I don't know if this helps, but have you tried a format pipe *just* in
>one of the index-format-hook with %f and using the script to extract
>the name part of the f
On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 12:52:02PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
What I would rather do is keep the full name in my alias, but have some
kind of $index_format format string which accesses the "raw" full name
from the message header instead of the name from $reverse_alias.
Is this pos
I run with:
set reverse_alias=yes
and aggressively manage my aliases, with autogenerated aliases for
almost every email address I've ever received direct email from.
Generally this is pleasing, with nice reliable "full name" parts shown
for almost everything via the &qu
in my ~/.mail_aliases file:
>
>| From: Robert Mutter
>| To: Zuvaz Clooless
>| Cc: Frank Oobarsen
>
> Much better if you ask me!
reverse_alias works with some but not all of your cases,
especially not Frank Oobarsen. But why do you care, when they
don't?
c
--
\black
Cameron McCormack:
> > Maybe even changing what %n in index_format expands to in this regard
> > would be good.
David Obwaller:
> Isn't that what reverse_alias=yes does?
Ah, I actually wasn’t aware of reverse_alias; I thought that was part of
the proposal from the OP.
-
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 01:44:40PM +1100, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> Maybe even changing what %n in index_format expands to in this regard
> would be good.
Isn't that what reverse_alias=yes does?
Would be great to have this kind of behaviour on replies and attribution
as well, though.
David
725...@gmail.com:
> Now, on hitting "g" for "group reply", I'd like Mutt to rewrite the
> "Real name" part of the addresses with the corresponding neat and tidy
> names in my ~/.mail_aliases file:
>
> | From: Robert Mutter
> | To: Zuvaz Clooless
> | Cc: Frank Oobarsen
>
> Much better if you as
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 02:45:19AM +0100, 725...@gmail.com wrote:
} I'd like Mutt to rewrite the "Real name" part of the addresses
} with the corresponding neat and tidy names in my ~/.mail_aliases file:
That would be awesome!
--
-Vance
Wouldn't it be nice if Mutt would gain the following cool feature for us
friends of clueless email users?
An obnoxious friend sends email with headers like:
| From: zuvaz "da hellraizer" clooless
| To: bob.muttr
| Cc: "foo...@example.net"
Now, on hitting "g" for "group reply", I'd like Mutt t
* Sascha Huedepohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-25 19:01]:
> > > I musst add that the friend uses multiple email-addresses
> > > and mutt than only converts the entrys in the index
> > > with the email-address whitch occures first.
> > you need an alias for each address then.
> i have aliases for
only converts the entrys in the index
> > with the email-address whitch occures first.
>
> you need an alias for each address then.
i have aliases for every address. But it doesn't work.
> > After i "unset reverse_alias" in my
> > .muttrc again mutt still "
* Sascha Huedepohl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-25 18:06]:
> > > but rather than rewriting all messages -
> > > how about using mutt's reverse_alias feature?
> > ah - cool feature.
> > I testet it but it seems to only "convert" the
> > f
This is debatable, but I think I found a bug.
I have reverse_alias set, so email/names are mapped on incoming mail. If I do a
'l'imit messages to, I'd like to be able to use the displayed name, but I still have
to limit to the email addy. understand?
alias
:r
alias foo
Baurjan Ismagulov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 20 Jun 2000:
> i've searched the archive but couldn't find anything related:
> most of my correspondents use more than one address to write to me. i
> want to reverse_alias them so the index looks uniformly. i don'
hi,
i've searched the archive but couldn't find anything related:
most of my correspondents use more than one address to write to me. i want to
reverse_alias them so the index looks uniformly. i don't want to setup aliases for
each address. is there a way to list them in
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
set attribution="Hello %v!\n\n%n wrote:\n"'
set index_format="%F"
set reverse_alias=yes
The first strange behavior occurs in the index menu. Although Person2
mailed with
| From: Person2 Name <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The index-menu shows
|
like to be able to
% generate mailboxes based upon the reverse_alias of the sender.
Been asked before.
%
% I have these in my .muttrc
%
% set reverse_name
% set reverse_alias
% alias joe Joseph User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
%
% plus other things that I don't think are related.
%
% I wou
Greetings all,
I am *very* much a newbie to mutt. First I would like to say that I
found most of the documentation relatively easy, thanks to the author.
My problem, perhaps a trivial one, is that I would like to be able to
generate mailboxes based upon the reverse_alias of the sender.
I have
the
following in my .muttrc
set reverse_name
set reverse_alias
alias joe Joseph User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
plus other settings which ( I think :-) are not relevant.
Can I get mutt to create a default mailbox name of joe instead of 12345?
TIA,
ps. I have RTFM, even if I didn't understan
Hello there,
Yesterday I received an email from a friend whose address is in my
.mutt.aliases file, but his name did not appear in the index as I had defined
it, but as his personal name as set by his mailer. I compared the address in
the alias file and in the header, they were the same. I then
22 matches
Mail list logo
