Hi,
* Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Second, since mutt already knows about List-Post to reply to a list
list even without a "subscribe" or "list" command, it should be
taught how to detect mailing lists completely. That way only mailing
lists without a given set of headers would require "list" commands
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, August 26 at 04:57 PM, quoth Rocco Rutte:
> First, at least one mailing lists considers setting Mail-Followup-To
> headers to achieve exactly that (no duplicate messages) being
> "rude", e.g. http://marc.info/?l=git&m=121218565402351&w=2
Hi,
* Kyle Wheeler wrote:
Well, without them, you can't use patterns like ~l or ~u. Also, without
them, mutt doesn't set the Mail-Followup-To header properly (which
helps avoid receiving duplicate responses due to people responding to
"all" and thus sending to both the list and to you). Also
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 11:57:13AM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote:
> On Saturday, August 23 at 08:46 PM, quoth Chris Bannister:
> > Is there anything wrong with NOT having a "subscribe" command for
> > any mailing lists you are subscribed to in your .muttrc?
>
> Well, without them, you can't use patte
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, August 23 at 08:46 PM, quoth Chris Bannister:
> Is there anything wrong with NOT having a "subscribe" command for
> any mailing lists you are subscribed to in your .muttrc?
Well, without them, you can't use patterns like ~l or ~u. Also,
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 06:48:39PM +0800, bill lam wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Michael Kjorling wrote:
>
> > On 20 Aug 2008 18:11 +0800, by [EMAIL PROTECTED] (bill lam):
> > > how to reply to (1) group
> >
> > L ()
> >
> > Note that you will need to tell mutt that the mail came through a
> > m
