Aaron Schrab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 12:32 -0500 16 May 2002, I wrote:
> > At 19:49 -0300 16 May 2002, Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Return-Path: <>
> > > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > and when
At 12:32 -0500 16 May 2002, I wrote:
> At 19:49 -0300 16 May 2002, Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Return-Path: <>
> > Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > and when I hit 'r' mutt shows To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > I h
At 19:49 -0300 16 May 2002, Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Return-Path: <>
> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> and when I hit 'r' mutt shows To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I have verified (thanks Sven) that reply_to="ask-yes" and
Eduardo --
[Sorry for not quoting; in a hurry.]
Aha!
Does this have anything to do with $alternates, then? Other differences
I see are that the From: hostname in the mail that fails is your usual
one. It looks from the Message-ID that your system might truly be the
one in the successful mail'
David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eduardo --
>
> ...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
> %
> % What would be the problem that when I hit 'r' to reply to a message,
> % the To: fields is filled with the recipient address and not with
> % resply-to address?
> ...
> % I have verified (thanks Sv
Eduardo --
...and then Eduardo Gargiulo said...
%
% What would be the problem that when I hit 'r' to reply to a message,
% the To: fields is filled with the recipient address and not with
% resply-to address?
...
% I have verified (thanks Sven) that reply_to="ask-yes" and 'r' is reply to
% a mes
Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm here again with my problem not solved ...
What would be the problem that when I hit 'r' to reply to a message,
the To: fields is filled with the recipient address and not with
resply-to address?
the headers are
Return-Path: <>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PRO
Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 21:01]:
> > I'm having some problems with TMDA confirmation messages. When I hit
> > 'r' to reply the messages, the To: field not show the correct address
> > (Reply-To), instead it shows the To: address of
* Eduardo Gargiulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 21:01]:
> I'm having some problems with TMDA confirmation messages. When I hit
> 'r' to reply the messages, the To: field not show the correct address
> (Reply-To), instead it shows the To: address of the original message.
> In the example below,
Hi all.
I'm having some problems with TMDA confirmation messages. When I hit
'r' to reply the messages, the To: field not show the correct address
(Reply-To), instead it shows the To: address of the original message.
In the example below, when i hit 'r' i saw To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hello,
Replying to an old email but I don't think there was an answer provided
(one that addressed the question, anyway).
Darren Wyn Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 07 Apr 2000:
> here is the mail i wish to reply to :
[relevant headers included here]
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From
Darren Wyn Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ Mutt 1.0i (1999-10-22 ]
>
> i'm having difficulty understanding how to
> reply to an e-mail from a list, which contains
> a set reply-to.
Basically the problem is that Reply-To: is being munged for mailing list
purposes. This is in general a bad id
12 matches
Mail list logo
