On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 09:57:35PM +0200, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
> Hanspeter Roth told:
>
> > Which newsreader is most similar to mutt?
> slrn. Ask Sven ;-)
Is there a set o key bindings to slrn similar to the
default one found in mutt? Where can
Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> On Oct 03 at 14:55, Sven Guckes spoke:
>> if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not*
>> the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists.
> Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers?
>
> Which newsreader is most similar to mutt?
As a mutt-us
On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 at 07:09:37PM +0200, Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> Which newsreader is most similar to mutt?
Mutt with a NNTP patch. Here's one that doesn't require any external programs:
http://www.ing.umu.se/~connor/programs/mutt.html
Regards,
-rex
--
"The actual user of the PC -- someone
* Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-03 15:01]:
> > if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not*
> > the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists.
>
> He was asking if there were other headers that other MUAs
> used instead of Reply-To. Presumably, Mutt could then be
> configured to
* Elimar Riesebieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-03 19:58]:
> > > if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not*
> > > the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists.
> > Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers?
yes. there are are several news services which offer an e
On Thu, 03 Oct 2002 the mental interface of
Hanspeter Roth told:
> On Oct 03 at 14:55, Sven Guckes spoke:
>
> > if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not*
> > the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists.
>
> Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers?
>
> Which
On Oct 03 at 14:55, Sven Guckes spoke:
> if the reason is *anotehr MUA then this is *not*
> the forum to discuss it. comp.mail.misc exists.
Is there a mailgateway for comp.mail.misc or comp.mail.headers?
Which newsreader is most similar to mutt?
-Hanspeter
On Oct 03 at 10:20, Kurt Lieber spoke:
> He was asking if there were other headers that other MUAs used instead of
> Reply-To. Presumably, Mutt could then be configured to add those *in
> addition to* the normal Reply-To header. IMO, perfectly on topic and a
> subject which I'm interested in
On Thu, Oct 03, 2002 at 02:55:53PM +0200 or thereabouts, Sven Guckes wrote:
> > Now if the only reason Reply-To is not honored is the configuration
> > of the one's MUA that's answering me, I have to accept that.
> > But if there is _another reason_ for this and
> > I can do something about it, I'
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-10-03 09:19]:
> The majority of ansers I get in deed come from mail clients that
> do honor Reply-To. But occasionally I realize that I get answers
> at the address that's not mentioned in the Reply-To header.
then the Reply-To is *not* honored. is this
On Oct 02 at 21:08, Will Yardley spoke:
[snipping a lot]
> Most mail clients either blindly honor Reply-To: OR give the user an
> option (or allow you to configure it either way).
>
> > And maybe there are also mailers which expect another header rather
> > than Reply-To. So if I knew those I
Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> On Oct 01 at 17:32, Will Yardley spoke:
> > Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all
> > the headers of their email messages and there are precious few mail
> It is probably up to the *MUA* rather than to people to see the
> Reply-To
On Oct 01 at 17:32, Will Yardley spoke:
> Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all
> the headers of their email messages and there are precious few mail
It is probably up to the *MUA* rather than to people to see the
Reply-To header.
As of Mutt it can be told
Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> I'm just wondering why some people don't honor Reply-To or
> Mail-Followup-To. Maybe they choose to ignore it.
> Or maybe their mailer is expecting another header therefore.
Most people probably don't *see* it, because most people don't read all
the headers of their ema
On Oct 01 at 01:13, Sven Guckes spoke:
> * Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 20:12]:
> > are there alternative headers to Reply-To:
> > and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs?
>
> "we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you."
Why? It isn't a fight against Reply-To and M
Hanspeter Roth wrote:
>
> Are there headers used by other MUAs that have similar function like
> Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To?
Well Reply-To: is an internet standard, and is followed by most mailers.
Mail-Followup-To: was an internet draft that never got adopted as a
standard; mutt is still cli
* Hanspeter Roth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-09-30 20:12]:
> are there alternative headers to Reply-To:
> and Mail-Followup-To: used by other MUAs?
"we could tell you - but then we'd have to kill you."
of course there are more headers - and all of them
are probably only supported by this one maile
Hello,
Are there headers used by other MUAs that have similar function like
Mail-Followup-To and Reply-To?
(Probably some users configure their mailers to ignore such
headers.)
-Hanspeter
Hello,
are there alternative headers to Reply-To: and Mail-Followup-To:
used by other MUAs?
-Hanspeter
19 matches
Mail list logo
