Re: pgp autosign

1999-09-02 Thread David DeSimone
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IMO, it would make more sense to have things temporary for sending > mail, but if a generic send-hook is required, then I will use that. Doubtless it would make more sense to you, and probably everyone else, if it worked that way, but the fact is that w

Re: pgp autosign

1999-09-01 Thread Joshua Weage
Thanks for all of the feedback. The behavior isn't exactly clear from the manual. The fact that things are permanently changed is mentioned for folder-hook but *not* for send-hook. IMO, it would make more sense to have things temporary for sending mail, but if a generic send-hook is req

Re: pgp autosign

1999-09-01 Thread Thomas Roessler
On 1999-08-31 18:23:23 -0400, Joshua Weage wrote: > If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a > send-hook applies to all further messages that you send until > another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad idea, and > isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the appr

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread David DeSimone
Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > set pgp_autosign > send-hook email@somewhere "unset pgp_autosign; etc..." No, that won't work, because once you send some mail to , pgp_autosign will be unset, and remain unset. > > send-hook ~A set pgp_autosign > > send-hook ~[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Rob Reid
At 6:23 PM EDT on August 31 Joshua Weage sent off: > If that is the case, then anything that was changed with > a send-hook applies to all further messages that you send > until another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad > idea, and isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the > a

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Jeremy Blosser
Joshua Weage [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 09:15:16PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote: > > That's not sufficient. Remeber that variables set from within hooks > > are persistant. > > > > If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a send-hook > applie

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Joshua Weage
If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a send-hook applies to all further messages that you send until another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad idea, and isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the appropriate send-hook to use to switch back to "normal" opera

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Thomas Roessler
That's not sufficient. Remeber that variables set from within hooks are persistant. On 1999-08-31 15:13:26 -0400, Joshua Weage wrote: > Date: Tue, 31 Aug 1999 15:13:26 -0400 > From: Joshua Weage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: pgp autosign >

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Joshua Weage
That should work, although the following will also: set pgp_autosign send-hook email@somewhere "unset pgp_autosign; etc..." Josh > > go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be done, if it can be done at > > all? > > You can do this (I believe) with send-hook, something like: > send-

Re: pgp autosign

1999-08-31 Thread Michael Elkins
[please send all questsion to [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Mon, Aug 30, 1999 at 04:10:15PM +0200, Bo?tjan Muller [NEONATUS] wrote: > I would like to enable mutt to autosign all my outgoing mails except ones that > go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] How can this be done, if it can be done at > all? You can do this