Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-18 Thread Scott Davis
Quoting Frank Derichsweiler On Thu, 15 Feb 2001: > I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. > Starting mutt with > xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt > produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. > Starting first xterm -geometry 220x

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 09:16:46AM -0500, Joe Philipps wrote: > > xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt > >produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. > > > > Does -wf help at all? > No. Same problem with that option added. Frank

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Thomas E. Dickey
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:32:49AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote: > > [mutt does not properly recognize screen size] > > > > Out of curiosity, what happens when you resize the xterm? Does > > mutt rearrange itself to take advantage of the full

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Joe Philipps
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:35:03AM +0100, Frank Derichsweiler wrote: >Hi Mutt-users, > > xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt >produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. > >Any idea? Does -wf help at all? -- Oo---o, Oo---

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 08:32:49AM -0500, darren chamberlain wrote: > [mutt does not properly recognize screen size] > > Out of curiosity, what happens when you resize the xterm? Does > mutt rearrange itself to take advantage of the full size, after > the xterm is resized? yes, that works fine

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Dirk Ruediger
Hi Frank, > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:09:26PM +0100, Dirk Ruediger wrote: > > > I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. > > > Starting mutt with > > > xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt > > > produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the line

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread darren chamberlain
Frank Derichsweiler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said something to this effect on 02/15/2001: > I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. > Starting mutt with > xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt > produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. >

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:09:26PM +0100, Dirk Ruediger wrote: > > I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. > > Starting mutt with > > xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt > > produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. > > <...> > > I

Re: mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Dirk Ruediger
Hi Frank, > I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. > Starting mutt with > xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt > produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. > <...> I use a script Xmutt and the "essential" line is: xterm -T "Mail fo

mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
Hi Mutt-users, I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. Starting mutt with xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. Starting first xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j and then ente

mutt does not recognize xterm size

2001-02-15 Thread Frank Derichsweiler
Hi Mutt-users, I have a problem during startup of mutt on a fast hardware. Starting mutt with xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j -e mutt produces a large xterm, but mutt only uses 1/3 of the lines. Starting first xterm -geometry 220x80+70+100 -vb -T "mutt Mail" -j and then ent