On Thu, Oct 05, 2000 at 08:46:34AM -0700, Peter Jaques wrote:
> Ok, does anyone know of a mailing list where i might be able to ask such
> questions? Obviously this is annoying you all. Just to respond to Claus's
> questions:
>
> > 2. I don't see your problem
> the problem is that the return-path
On Thu, Oct 05, 2000, Peter Jaques wrote:
> Ok, does anyone know of a mailing list where i might be able to ask such
> questions? Obviously this is annoying you all. Just to respond to Claus's
> questions:
news:comp.mail.sendmail
> > 2. I don't see your problem
> the problem is that the return-p
Ok, does anyone know of a mailing list where i might be able to ask such
questions? Obviously this is annoying you all. Just to respond to Claus's
questions:
> 2. I don't see your problem
the problem is that the return-path is getting set to be the very first
sending address, ie mugwort@localhost
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000, Peter Jaques wrote:
> here are the headers from a message i sent from mutt to my other account:
>
> >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 17:06:04 2000
That's what you want right?
> Received: (from mugwort@localhost)
> by sol.A (8.9.3/8.9.3)
here are the headers from a message i sent from mutt to my other account:
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 4 17:06:04 2000
Received: from dnai.com (dnai.com [207.181.194.98])
by occs.cs.oberlin.edu (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id TAA19065
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 4 Oct 2000 19:5
On Wed, Oct 04, 2000, Peter Jaques wrote:
> it does; i used to get all the "x-authentication-warning"s, till i changed
> my sendmail.cf. & sendmail IS honoring the -f; it correctly sets the
> "From " header. it just doesn't set "Return-path" right.
This is somewhat off-topic for mutt...
The Retu
Peter Jaques <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 04 Oct 2000:
> it does; i used to get all the "x-authentication-warning"s, till i changed
> my sendmail.cf. & sendmail IS honoring the -f; it correctly sets the
> "From " header. it just doesn't set "Return-path" right.
That doesn't make sense. The
it does; i used to get all the "x-authentication-warning"s, till i changed
my sendmail.cf. & sendmail IS honoring the -f; it correctly sets the
"From " header. it just doesn't set "Return-path" right.
peter
On 3 Oct 00, 2:23PM, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> If you're passing -f to sendmail (either m
Peter Jaques [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> hi kids... on one of the mailing lists i'm subscribed to, none of my
> messages get through. the problem is that i'm subscribed as
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], but mutt & sendmail set my Return-Path to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], which doesn't even exist (mugwort is my l
Using a large mallet, Peter Jaques whacked out:
> i've tried that & all the other things i mentioned in my previous post.
Puzzling ...
+suresh
>
> peter
>
> On 3 Oct 00, 11:19AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > Peter Jaques proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> >
> > > >set sendmail
i've tried that & all the other things i mentioned in my previous post.
peter
On 3 Oct 00, 11:19AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Peter Jaques proclaimed on mutt-users that:
>
> > >set sendmail='/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -oem -oi'
>
> /usr/sbin/sendmail -t -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PR
Peter Jaques proclaimed on mutt-users that:
> >set sendmail='/usr/sbin/sendmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] -oem -oi'
/usr/sbin/sendmail -t -oi -oem -f [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newer (1.2.x) mutts, set envelope_from should do.
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian + Wallopus Malletus Indigenensis
mallet @ cluestick.or
hi kids... on one of the mailing lists i'm subscribed to, none of my
messages get through. the problem is that i'm subscribed as
[EMAIL PROTECTED], but mutt & sendmail set my Return-Path to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], which doesn't even exist (mugwort is my local username on
the freebsd box; dnai is my isp
13 matches
Mail list logo
