On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:49:16PM +0200, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
> The mutt homepage [1] links to the mutt mailing list archives for -users
> [2] and -dev [3]. Both are not reachable (at least right now).
Thanks for the report, we've just updated the website.
--
Kevin J. McCarthy
GPG Fi
On Tuesday 01.09.15 17:51, Elias Diem wrote:
> Hi Bastian
>
> On 2015-09-01, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
>
> > The mutt homepage [1] links to the mutt mailing list archives for -users
> > [2] and -dev [3]. Both are not reachable (at least right now).
> >
> >
> > 1: http://www.mutt.org/
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:49:16PM +0200, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
>
> The mutt homepage [1] links to the mutt mailing list archives for -users
> [2] and -dev [3]. Both are not reachable (at least right now).
>
>
> 1: http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
> 2: http://marc.theaimsgroup.c
Hi Bastian
On 2015-09-01, bastian-muttu...@t6l.de wrote:
> The mutt homepage [1] links to the mutt mailing list archives for -users
> [2] and -dev [3]. Both are not reachable (at least right now).
>
>
> 1: http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
> 2: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-users
The mutt homepage [1] links to the mutt mailing list archives for -users
[2] and -dev [3]. Both are not reachable (at least right now).
1: http://www.mutt.org/mail-lists.html
2: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-users
3: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mutt-dev
The domain marc.theaim
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:37:33PM +0100, Daniel Schömer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> seanh schrieb:
> > [...]
> >
> > But this still saves each message to an archive folder based on the current
> > year when mutt was started, rather than on the year of the message. You
> > can't
> > define a save-hook base
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:06:48PM +0100, Kirill Miazine wrote:
> * Michael Tatge [2010-12-23 11:51]:
> >* On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 05:37PM + seanh (snh...@gmail.com) muttered:
> >>I'm trying to emulate Thunderbird 3's mail archiving behaviour in mutt. In
> >>Thunderbird if you select a mail or mai
Hi!
seanh schrieb:
> [...]
>
> But this still saves each message to an archive folder based on the current
> year when mutt was started, rather than on the year of the message. You can't
> define a save-hook based on the year of the message because there isn't an
> expando for that, only for the
How about this:
macro index,pager a "=Archives/`date +%Y`"
* Michael Tatge [2010-12-23 11:51]:
* On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 05:37PM + seanh (snh...@gmail.com) muttered:
I'm trying to emulate Thunderbird 3's mail archiving behaviour in mutt. In
Thunderbird if you select a mail or mails and hit th
* On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 05:37PM + seanh (snh...@gmail.com) muttered:
> I'm trying to emulate Thunderbird 3's mail archiving behaviour in mutt. In
> Thunderbird if you select a mail or mails and hit the archive button or press
> the 'a' key then it moves the mail(s) into an archive folder. For ea
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:18:04PM -0500, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Given that I have this working nicely:
> set record="~/Mail/archive/sent-`date +%Y-%m`"
>
> I'm sure that you could do a similar thing in a save-hook. If
> you want annual rather than -MM, just make it `date +%Y`
This works:
s
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:46:36PM +, seanh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:37:29PM +, seanh wrote:
> > Also, I realised that if the year is 2010 when you archive a mail then it
> > will
> > go into Archives/2010, even though (if the mail has been hanging around in
> > your
> > inbox)
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 07:46:36PM +, seanh wrote:
[...]
> I think save-hook is pretty close to what you would need here. Unfortunately
> you need to filter messages according to their year, and their doesn't seem to
> be a save-hook expando for that (there is one for the date, but only for t
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:37:29PM +, seanh wrote:
> Also, I realised that if the year is 2010 when you archive a mail then it will
> go into Archives/2010, even though (if the mail has been hanging around in
> your
> inbox) you might have actually received the mail in 2009. A better macro mig
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:37:29PM +, seanh wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I'm trying to emulate Thunderbird 3's mail archiving behaviour in mutt. In
> Thunderbird if you select a mail or mails and hit the archive button or press
> the 'a' key then it moves the mail(s) into an archive folder. For each acco
Hey,
I'm trying to emulate Thunderbird 3's mail archiving behaviour in mutt. In
Thunderbird if you select a mail or mails and hit the archive button or press
the 'a' key then it moves the mail(s) into an archive folder. For each account
it creates a folder called Archives with sub-folders for each
* darren chamberlain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [31-08-2002 22:48]:
> What about maildir2mbox? I think it's part of qmail, yes?
Or, simply from within mutt:
:set mbox_type=mbox
And then you can save them to a compressed folder using the
aforementioned patch.
--
René Clerc -
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 10:45:17AM +1200, Volker Kuhlmann wrote:
> > lazyness ;-) I simply do a tar czf archiv.year < folderlist ... converting
> > to mbox would include some more steps.
>
> Sorry you can not simply cat maildir/* >mbox.
I never claimed this.
[...]
I know all the things you wrote
* Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-28 04:36]:
> > > you're not updateting it in maildir form, what's the advantage of
> > > using maildir here over mbox?
>
> > lazyness ;-) I simply do a tar czf archiv.year < folderlist ...
> > converting to mbox would include some more steps.
>
> So
> > you're not updateting it in maildir form, what's the advantage of using
> > maildir here over mbox?
> lazyness ;-) I simply do a tar czf archiv.year < folderlist ... converting
> to mbox would include some more steps.
Sorry you can not simply cat maildir/* >mbox. It throws you badly with
"^F
* Fernan Aguero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-21 14:05]:
> I have currently about 300 M in my ~/mail dir. .. Not that disk
> space is scarce ... but I'd like to keep old mail in an organized
> mail archive (perhaps using the same organization of mailboxes, but
> also separated by year/month whatev
On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 11:06:42AM -0300, Fernan Aguero wrote:
> Now my question is, in the event I need to access/search this archives
> is mutt able to read compressed files? If so, what would be the
> recommended storage (so that mutt will read them later)?
there is a compressed-folder patch,
Hi again,
I have currently about 300 M in my ~/mail dir. Perhaps many of you
have still more.
Not that disk space is scarce ... but I'd like to keep old mail in
an organized mail archive (perhaps using the same organization of
mailboxes, but also separated by year/month whatever). Before
reinve
Did you also check the mail archive link from mutt.org?
I noticed there are two: one to egroups and another on mutt.org
> Greetings mutt friends,
>
> Can anyone help me find some mutt-user lore of old? The egroups
> archive goes back to mid 1998, but I'm looking for some messages I
> would h
Greetings mutt friends,
Can anyone help me find some mutt-user lore of old? The egroups
archive goes back to mid 1998, but I'm looking for some messages I
would have sent in 1996 or 1997?
I would have copies, except I had a send-hook at the time which
disabled my Fcc for any archived lists.
Oh
OK, I guess I should contribute the solution I finally used. The
problem at hand was a 34 MB mailing list archive containing lots of
news excerpts (about 1 messages). For an article I'm going to
write, I wanted to scan that archive for contributions concerning
certain topics.
My solution wa
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 01:34:10PM +0100, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> I seem to recall that someone on this list wrote about some clever scripts
> to automate the use of glimpse and mutt to search huge e-mail archives.
> Any pointers?
I think I did, a long time ago.
I use this script to
On Sat, 26 Feb 2000, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> I seem to recall that someone on this list wrote about some clever
> scripts to automate the use of glimpse and mutt to search huge
> e-mail archives. Any pointers?
For mbox folders you could try something like this:
find ~/Mail -maxdept
On Sat, Feb 26, 2000 at 10:25:07AM -0500, Bennett Todd wrote:
> 2000-02-26-07:34:10 Thomas Roessler:
> > I seem to recall that someone on this list wrote about some clever
> > scripts to automate the use of glimpse and mutt to search huge
> > e-mail archives. Any pointe
2000-02-26-07:34:10 Thomas Roessler:
> I seem to recall that someone on this list wrote about some clever
> scripts to automate the use of glimpse and mutt to search huge
> e-mail archives. Any pointers?
I did that a while back. I can describe 'em in some detail. However,
I don&#
I seem to recall that someone on this list wrote about some clever
scripts to automate the use of glimpse and mutt to search huge
e-mail archives. Any pointers?
Thanks.
--
http://www.guug.de/~roessler/
31 matches
Mail list logo
