Re: list is still sending doubles

1999-02-10 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 10:35:08AM +, Steve Kennedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 07:26:42PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:14:26PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I realize that most of you have filters which keep you f

Re: list is still sending doubles

1999-02-09 Thread Steve Kennedy
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 07:26:42PM -0800, Daniel Eisenbud wrote: > On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:14:26PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I realize that most of you have filters which keep you from seeing doubles, > > but this doesn't mean that the problem shouldn't be resolved. Is th

Re: list is still sending doubles

1999-02-08 Thread Daniel Eisenbud
On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 06:14:26PM -0800, Joe Rhett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I realize that most of you have filters which keep you from seeing doubles, > but this doesn't mean that the problem shouldn't be resolved. Is there any > good reason for the list to send 2 copies of everything? Yeah

list is still sending doubles

1999-02-08 Thread Joe Rhett
I realize that most of you have filters which keep you from seeing doubles, but this doesn't mean that the problem shouldn't be resolved. Is there any good reason for the list to send 2 copies of everything? -- Joe Rhett Systems Engineer [EMAIL PR