Re: limit question

1999-04-20 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 10:36:15 -0700, Robert Chien wrote: > 3. Binding ^L to unlimit in the source code? so that when you press '?' > for help and search for 'limit', it'll come up? You can put comments into your macro defintions so searching will work fine without changing the source code. ma

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Einar Indridason
> > limit string that matches nothing, like "b6a3", to make the limit fail > > so that it'll take me back to the full inbox. Is there a more elegant > > way? > > The command to show all messages is ~b A I use "~l all" (yes, I did use Elm before...) I have one complaint about mutt, however... It

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Anonymous
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:33:45PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: > Hi, > > I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a > certain criteria (usually by sender's email addr), when I'm done, I > would like to go back to my full inbox. But there's no "unlimit" key > definition (or i

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Gero Treuner
Hi! On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 01:48:15PM +, Einar Indridason wrote: > I have one complaint about mutt, however... It is too efficient... I can > read/deal with my email a bit speedier than I could under Elm :-) Not too efficient, it just saves you money: sell your computer and get an older sec

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Robert Chien
On Sun, Apr 18, 1999 at 04:28:03PM +0200, Stefan `Sec` Zehl wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 06:38:17PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: > > This is good, but wouldn't it be more intuitive to show me all messages > > when the limit is blank? developers, would you consider this? > > We had this discussi

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David DeSimone
Robert Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also, I've noticed that if I do limit, delete, sync, multiple times in > random order, sometimes all New mails in my inbox are marked read! I > have not been able to reproduce it, but it's possibly a bug. I'm > using IMAP. The new/old status is contro

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David DeSimone
Robert Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1. I'm sure people will ask this question in the future again, so how > about putting this in the doc? I think Section 4. Advanced Usage is > suitable. Hey, Mutt is an Open Source program. That means that YOU can go and put it into the docs, written up

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David Shaw
On Mon, Apr 19, 1999 at 12:48:25PM -0500, David DeSimone wrote: > Robert Chien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Also, I've noticed that if I do limit, delete, sync, multiple times in > > random order, sometimes all New mails in my inbox are marked read! I > > have not been able to reproduce it,

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread Richard P. Groenewegen
On Sat, Apr 17, 1999 at 11:36:27AM +0200, Michael Thies wrote: > Bevan Broun hat ueber "Re: limit question" geschrieben: > > > Odd. I always just "l all". > > > > "l *" is shorter. > > But it shows me, that all messages are limite

Re: limit question

1999-04-19 Thread David Thorburn-Gundlach
Warning Could not process message with given Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd; micalg=pgp-sha1;protocol="application/pgp-signature"

Re: limit question

1999-04-18 Thread Stefan `Sec` Zehl
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 06:38:17PM -0700, Robert Chien wrote: > This is good, but wouldn't it be more intuitive to show me all messages > when the limit is blank? developers, would you consider this? We had this discussion already. I then wrote a patch to do this (for .89 - you could get it from

Re: limit question

1999-04-17 Thread Anonymous
Bevan Broun hat ueber "Re: limit question" geschrieben: > > Odd. I always just "l all". > > "l *" is shorter. But it shows me, that all messages are limited. And when using "l all" I get the normal state back, i.e. unlimit Maybe you can

Re: limit question

1999-04-16 Thread Bevan Broun
> Odd. I always just "l all". "l *" is shorter. BB -- Bevan Broun ph (08) 9380 1587 Computer Systems Officer fax (08) 9380 1065 Dept. Electrical and Electronic Engineering University of Western Australia

Re: limit question

1999-04-16 Thread Jeffrey Haas
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 07:47:43PM -0500, G. T. Francisco wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:33:45PM -0700, Robert Chien said: > > I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a > > certain criteria (usually by sender's email addr), when I'm done, I > > would like to go back to

Re: limit question

1999-04-16 Thread Robert Chien
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 09:12:43PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote: > On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 07:47:43PM -0500, G. T. Francisco wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:33:45PM -0700, Robert Chien said: > > > I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a > > > certain criteria (usually

Re: limit question

1999-04-16 Thread G. T. Francisco
On Fri, Apr 16, 1999 at 05:33:45PM -0700, Robert Chien said: > I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a > certain criteria (usually by sender's email addr), when I'm done, I > would like to go back to my full inbox. But there's no "unlimit" key > definition (or indication

limit question

1999-04-16 Thread Robert Chien
Hi, I have a simple question: after I type 'l' to limit messages by a certain criteria (usually by sender's email addr), when I'm done, I would like to go back to my full inbox. But there's no "unlimit" key definition (or indication of it in help). What I do now is to enter a limit string that ma