On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 06:12:48PM -0600 or thereabouts, David DeSimone wrote:
> Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I KNOW what the documented behaviour for mutt is. What I was
> > explaining was why I always use 'g'roup reply instead of 'L'ist reply.
>
> I have also more-or-less aba
Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I KNOW what the documented behaviour for mutt is. What I was
> explaining was why I always use 'g'roup reply instead of 'L'ist reply.
I have also more-or-less abandoned the List-Reply function within Mutt.
I participate in a few mailing lists which mos
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 05:36:05PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> The purpose of this field is to prevent you from receiving duplicate copies
> of replies to messages which you send by specifying that you will receive a
> copy of the message if it is addressed to the mailing list (and thus there
>
Mark Mielke [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> The thing is... this makes perfect sense for 'L'ist reply... but not
> for 'g'roup reply. There _is_ a difference.
Yes, there is. 'L'ist reply replies to just the one address that is the
list, while 'g'roup reply replies to all To: and Cc: addresses, thou
On Fri, Jan 14, 2000 at 07:41:52PM +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote:
> Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000:
>> Either Mail-FollowUp-To: should _only_ include the list, or it
>> should include everybody which includes me. Because the first isn't
>> always possible (we have no way o
Mark Mielke [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 05:43:22PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> > The `lists' command specifies the mailing lists to which you are subscribed.
> > Since the purpose of the mail-followup-to field is to affect a group reply,
> > there is no reason to put yo
Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 14 Jan 2000:
> Either Mail-FollowUp-To: should _only_ include the list, or it should include
> everybody which includes me. Because the first isn't always possible (we have
> no way of knowing which people are actually in which list) I think the second
On Thu, Jan 13, 2000 at 05:43:22PM -0800, Michael Elkins wrote:
> The `lists' command specifies the mailing lists to which you are subscribed.
> Since the purpose of the mail-followup-to field is to affect a group reply,
> there is no reason to put your own email address in there since you are
> a
The `lists' command specifies the mailing lists to which you are subscribed.
Since the purpose of the mail-followup-to field is to affect a group reply,
there is no reason to put your own email address in there since you are
already a member of the list (which is included in m-f-t).
me
PGP sign
Here are the lines of my ~/.muttrc that might be significant at all:
===
set alternates="markm|al278|mark\@.*mielke"
set nometoo # Should we include ourself in To:/CC: lists?
set nomenu_scroll# Should we scroll one line at a time?
set allow_8bit # 8-bit ok? or 7-bit + qu
10 matches
Mail list logo
