Re: reply mailing list send-hook problem

2009-04-08 Thread Zhengquan Zhang
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 03:04:33PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Wednesday, April 8 at 02:37 PM, quoth Zhengquan Zhang: > >send-hook '~t ccl-tech' "push > >',o...@ccl.northwestern.edu' " > > > >But today when I was trying to use L to reply some mails from ccl-tech > >mailing list, this send-hoo

Re: reply mailing list send-hook problem

2009-04-08 Thread Zhengquan Zhang
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:37:26PM -0500, Zhengquan Zhang wrote: > Dear mutt community, > > Finally I have settled with a send-hook that whenever I send email to > ccl-tech mailing list, it will automatically be CCed to oas. > > send-hook '~t ccl-tech' "push ',o...@ccl.northwestern.edu' " > > Bu

Re: reply mailing list send-hook problem

2009-04-08 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, April 8 at 02:37 PM, quoth Zhengquan Zhang: >send-hook '~t ccl-tech' "push >',o...@ccl.northwestern.edu' " > >But today when I was trying to use L to reply some mails from ccl-tech >mailing list, this send-hook does not work.. when I ed

reply mailing list send-hook problem

2009-04-08 Thread Zhengquan Zhang
Dear mutt community, Finally I have settled with a send-hook that whenever I send email to ccl-tech mailing list, it will automatically be CCed to oas. send-hook '~t ccl-tech' "push ',o...@ccl.northwestern.edu' " But today when I was trying to use L to reply some mails from ccl-tech mailing list

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-25 Thread Alain Bench
Hi Henry! On Wednesday, August 22, 2007 at 6:48:32 +0900, Henry Nelson wrote: [superscript one] > In Alain's post it was a wide character, in Breen's, single width. There is a problem: You're supposed to see question mark(s). You have an EUC-JP-MS terminal, and its subset EUC-JP locale

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-21 Thread Henry Nelson
On Wed, Aug 22, 2007 at 12:11:23PM +0900, Henry Nelson wrote: > were lost and replaced with literal "?". Alain's was "$BB9(B" (_mago_, > grand- > child), iirc, and Breen's was "?" (_ke_, half-width katakana). (I see them Probably no one interested, but as a final follow-up I'll mention here t

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-21 Thread Henry Nelson
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 08:40:20PM -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Wednesday, August 22 at 06:48 AM, quoth Henry Nelson: > >On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:39:49PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > >> | message-hook pattern 'set display_filter="sed s/??/\\\047/g"' > > > >On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:29:27AM

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-21 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday, August 22 at 06:48 AM, quoth Henry Nelson: >On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:39:49PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: >> | message-hook pattern 'set display_filter="sed s/??/\\\047/g"' > >On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:29:27AM -0700, Breen Mullins w

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-21 Thread Henry Nelson
On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 01:39:49PM +0200, Alain Bench wrote: > | message-hook pattern'set display_filter="sed s/??/\\\047/g"' On Tue, Aug 21, 2007 at 07:29:27AM -0700, Breen Mullins wrote: > * Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-21 13:39 +0200]: > >| message-hook pattern 'set di

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-21 Thread Breen Mullins
* Alain Bench <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-21 13:39 +0200]: | set config_charset=utf-8 # muttrc's charset | | message-hook ."unset display_filter" | message-hook pattern 'set display_filter="sed s/¹/\\\047/g"' That's done it. Thanks! While at it, Breen could sed it to the

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-21 Thread Alain Bench
Hi Kyle, Breen, On Monday, August 20, 2007 at 9:50:11 -0600, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > The best way to fix this is with [...] sed "s/\o302\o271/'/g" However this notation will not be portable to non-UTF-8 locales. I'd suggest to just write the superscript one itself in muttrc, and let Mutt's $c

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Breen Mullins
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-20 20:21 -0600]: Heh, OSX's sed can handle the character directly. For example: /usr/bin/sed "s/¹/'/g" Huh. So it can. Now all I have to do is sort out the quoting in the message-hook... Thanks again! -- Breen Mullins Menlo Park, California

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, August 20 at 05:25 PM, quoth Breen Mullins: >> The best way to fix this is with sed, rather than tr: >> >> sed "s/\o302\o271/'/g" >> >> (That's for GNU sed; other sed's use different syntax for >> specifying bytes.) > > Yeah. OS X here

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Breen Mullins
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-20 09:50 -0600]: Aha! :) It's pretty obvious when you think about it. Let me guess, you use a UTF-8 locale? Yep. The tr program, knowing only bytes, finds the 0xB9 byte and transforms it into 0x27, just like you told it to, leaving 0xC2 0x27. Be

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday, August 20 at 07:40 AM, quoth Breen Mullins: > * Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-20 07:42 > -0600]: > >> On Sunday, August 19 at 12:41 PM, quoth Breen Mullins: >>> I've wrestled with this one for a few days and I'm not getting >>>

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Breen Mullins
* Kai Grossjohann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-20 17:36 +0200]: Type Ctrl-E on the message and replace the charset iso-8859-1 with Windows-1252. If the message has multiple parts, hit v then choose the part that is displayed wrongly, then do Ctrl-E as described above. Does it help? Nope. Sti

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Type Ctrl-E on the message and replace the charset iso-8859-1 with Windows-1252. If the message has multiple parts, hit v then choose the part that is displayed wrongly, then do Ctrl-E as described above. Does it help? Kai On Sun, Aug 19, 2007 at 12:41:46PM -0700, Breen Mullins wrote: > I've

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Breen Mullins
* Kyle Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-20 07:42 -0600]: On Sunday, August 19 at 12:41 PM, quoth Breen Mullins: I've wrestled with this one for a few days and I'm not getting anywhere. It should be simple (and probably is!) but I'm not seeing it. Could you post an example message so that

Re: Message-hook problem

2007-08-20 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday, August 19 at 12:41 PM, quoth Breen Mullins: > I've wrestled with this one for a few days and I'm not getting > anywhere. > It should be simple (and probably is!) but I'm not seeing it. Could you post an example message so that we can exami

Message-hook problem

2007-08-19 Thread Breen Mullins
I've wrestled with this one for a few days and I'm not getting anywhere. It should be simple (and probably is!) but I'm not seeing it. I've got a correspondent whose version of Entourage is sending oddly broken messages. When she types an apostrophe, MS converts it to a curly one. That's correct

Re: hook problem

2001-09-02 Thread Michael Tatge
Benjamin Michotte muttered: > I've got those hook > > # close all threads > folder-hook . push "\eV" > > and so, when I start mutt, i've got a "beep" and this error message: > There are no messages. If there are no message in your $spoolfile collapsing threads fails. Just ignore the message. >

hook problem

2001-08-31 Thread Benjamin Michotte
hello, I want to use some *-hook, but there's something boring. When I start mutt, I'm in my spool directory. I've got those hook unhook * set default_hook = "~f %s !~P | (~P ~C %s)" # close all threads folder-hook . push "\eV" save-hook ^judge +diplomacy send-hook . 'set nopgp_autosign' send-ho

Re: send-hook problem

2001-07-31 Thread Thomas Huemmler
Hi Ïåòúð, * Ïåòúð Äîáðåâ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010731 12:09]: > Íà 07 ÿíóàðè 2001ã. (íåäåëÿ) â 20:14 ÷àñà, Martin íàïèñà: > > On Sunday, January 07, 2001 (CS:7.01.007) 17:38:37 [PM] (-0200) > > Peter Dobrev [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... > > Try this > > send-hook . *your default send-hook here* > >

Re: send-hook problem

2001-07-31 Thread Петър Добрев
Íà 07 ÿíóàðè 2001ã. (íåäåëÿ) â 20:14 ÷àñà, Martin íàïèñà: > On Sunday, January 07, 2001 (CS:7.01.007) 17:38:37 [PM] (-0200) > Peter Dobrev [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... > > > after the sending of the message. I think that if making a send-hook > > for all the other (non-added in already existing s

Re: folder-hook problem

2001-07-17 Thread Drew Raines
* Andre Wyrwa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Just a guess, but how about this one: > > folder-hook outbox.*$ 'set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b/%d} %-20.20F (%4c) %s"' I am a moron. Yep, that works. I've seen a hundred people do that before on this list, too. Thanks, Andre. -- Drew (banging head)

Re: folder-hook problem

2001-07-17 Thread Andre Wyrwa
On Tue, 17. Jul 2001 um 02:52:44PM -0500, Drew Raines wrote: > Forgive me if this has been asked before, but what's wrong with this line > in my muttrc: > > folder-hook outbox.*$ set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b/%d} %-20.20F (%4c) %s" > Just a guess, but how about this one: folder-hook outbox.*$

folder-hook problem

2001-07-17 Thread Drew Raines
Forgive me if this has been asked before, but what's wrong with this line in my muttrc: folder-hook outbox.*$ set index_format="%4C %Z %{%b/%d} %-20.20F (%4c) %s" It tells me that %Z is an unknown variable, and proceeds to only shows message numbers in the index once I change to an outbox* fo

Re: Save Hook Problem

2001-05-08 Thread Dale Morris
Lawrence Mitchell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > fcc-hook '~t mutt-users' =muttsent > the fcc-save-hook is if you want the save-hook and the fcc­hook to be the same > for a particular pattern, saves on typing. That might be your problem. > hope that helps thanks, I'll give it try.

Re: Save Hook Problem

2001-05-08 Thread Lawrence Mitchell
* On [010508 06:29] Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...]But I'm having a hard time > getting mutt to put a copy of the message *I've sent* to the > list in my =out mailbox. Here's what I have in my .muttrc > thus far: > > save-hook '~C mutt-users' =support > fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-user

Save Hook Problem

2001-05-07 Thread Dale Morris
Finally, after a long time with mutt, I've started using save-hooks. I'm trying to save list messages to a =support mailbox and I've got that. But I'm having a hard time getting mutt to put a copy of the message *I've sent* to the list in my =out mailbox. Here's what I have in my .muttrc thus far:

Re: send-hook problem

2001-01-08 Thread Peter Dobrev
I just sorry !:) I was too stupid and didn't see the | at the one of my multi send-hook which and the problem is solved! Thanks a lot guys !:)

Re: send-hook problem

2001-01-08 Thread Peter Dobrev
On Monday, January 08, 2001 at 06:36:55PM, Wilhelm Wienemann wrote: > Hello Peter! > > On Mon, 08 Jan 2001, Peter Dobrev wrote: > > > ?? 07 ?? 2001?. (??) ? 20:14 , Martin ??: > > > On Sunday, January 07, 2001 (CS:7.01.007) 17:38:37 [PM] (-0200) > > > Peter Dobrev [[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: send-hook problem

2001-01-07 Thread Петър Добрев
Íà 07 ÿíóàðè 2001ã. (íåäåëÿ) â 20:14 ÷àñà, Martin íàïèñà: > On Sunday, January 07, 2001 (CS:7.01.007) 17:38:37 [PM] (-0200) > Peter Dobrev [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... > > > after the sending of the message. I think that if making a send-hook > > for all the other (non-added in already existing s

Re: send-hook problem

2001-01-07 Thread Martin
On Sunday, January 07, 2001 (CS:7.01.007) 17:38:37 [PM] (-0200) Peter Dobrev [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote... > after the sending of the message. I think that if making a send-hook > for all the other (non-added in already existing send-hook) e-mails should > do it but I don't know how? I tried to ad

Re: send-hook problem

2001-01-07 Thread Wilhelm Wienemann
Hello Peter! On Sun, 07 Jan 2001, Peter Dobrev wrote: > I live in Bulgaria so I want the headers, the signature and the > attribution of some messages to be in Bulgarian. Well I use send-hooks > for this but here comes the problem. Imagine this situation: I have to > reply to a Bulgarian friend

send-hook problem

2001-01-07 Thread Peter Dobrev
Hello! I live in Bulgaria so I want the headers, the signature and the attribution of some messages to be in Bulgarian. Well I use send-hooks for this but here comes the problem. Imagine this situation: I have to reply to a Bulgarian friend and to foreign mailing list. First I reply to the Bulgari

Re: save-hook problem PART-II

2000-06-01 Thread Michael Tatge
Sergei Gerasenko muttered: > > save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +test > > This is supposed to move all read mail coming from > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my email address) to "test". > > The above hook is the only save-hook in the muttrc right now. So, > there shouldn't be any conflict there. I also have a c

Re: save-hook problem

2000-05-31 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Sergei Gerasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 31 May 2000: > As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing > messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done > according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my computer > whether

save-hook problem PART-II

2000-05-31 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
Hi,   this is a short addendum to my previous message about save-hooks. It was suggested that I provide more detail about my muttrc configuration. Unfortunately, I'm at work right now and can't send you guys a copy of my muttrc. I hear some of you say "well, then wait till you get home and t

Re: save-hook problem

2000-05-31 Thread Wolfram Stoermer
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 01:03:51PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote: > Hi guys, > > > As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing > messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done > according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my

Re: save-hook problem

2000-05-31 Thread David T-G
Sergei -- ...and then Sergei Gerasenko said... % Hi guys, % % I recently unsubscribed from the list because I was overwhelmed by the % amount of mail I was getting. I'm now going to use procmail. Anyway, the Welcome back :-) % question I have is probably trivial for most of you. I've tried to

save-hook problem

2000-05-31 Thread Sergei Gerasenko
Hi guys, I recently unsubscribed from the list because I was overwhelmed by the amount of mail I was getting. I'm now going to use procmail. Anyway, the question I have is probably trivial for most of you. I've tried to define a couple of save-hooks in my muttrc and none of them have any effect o

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-10 Thread J McKitrick
How does mutt *do* all of these things with only 300K? I'm stunned by the amount of pattern matching and on-the-fly processing the prog must do, and yet it is SO fast! And totally configurable! -- -jm

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-10 Thread David DeSimone
Byrial Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, I would say the canonical way to match everything is the ~A > pattern. When referring to message patterns, ~A is the "true" way to match all messages, but other hooks refer to text strings, or pathnames, such as folder-hooks. For those, ~A match

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-10 Thread Byrial Jensen
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 23:52:30 +0200, Mikko Hänninen wrote: > And, incidentally, the best (or recommended) way of writing a pattern > that matches everything is with a single dot, "." Well, I would say the canonical way to match everything is the ~Ã pattern. In fact "." is internally converted

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread David T-G
Eugene & Josh, et al -- ...and then Eugene Lee said... % On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Jim Toth wrote: % : % : When multiple matches occur, commands are executed in the order % : they are specified in the muttrc. % % I got bit by this too just a little while ago. I guess I'm use

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Eugene Lee
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 05:25:36PM -0500, Jim Toth wrote: :On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) :said: :> :> The commented out line always gets matched and will force the :> default signature. Is is simply changing the order? : :Yep, that's it. From the ma

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Jim Toth
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said: > I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to > be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then > start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works > f

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Lars Hecking
Josh Kuperman writes: > I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to > be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then > start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works > fine. But I can't figure out how to get it to reset to my def

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Alisdair McDiarmid
On Thu, Mar 09, 2000 at 03:34:08PM -0500, Josh Kuperman wrote: > I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to > be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then > start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works > fine. But I can't fi

Re: signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Mikko Hänninen
Josh Kuperman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 09 Mar 2000: > The commented out line always gets matched and will force the > default signature. Is is simply changing the order? Yes, the order is significant. Put the default send-hook first. And, incidentally, the best (or recommended) way of w

signature send-hook problem

2000-03-09 Thread Josh Kuperman
I have a bunch of signature files I use with friends, which I wan't to be used only for messages to those friends. If I exit out and then start mutt again everything works as I expect. . And that part works fine. But I can't figure out how to get it to reset to my default .signature file for the n

Re: small send-hook problem

1999-12-13 Thread David T-G
Rejo -- I don't see anything about your Cc: hook problem, though I suspect that Cc: won't want to be unset but instead reset to "" or some such. To not include the original email in the reply, though, just set noinclude (probably with a hook :-) HTH &

small send-hook problem

1999-11-26 Thread Rejo Zenger
Hi, I'm probably overlooking a simple thing, but i just cannot figure out the problem here. I have tried the last hour and it just doesn't seem to work out. The problem is this: send-hook . 'unmy_hdr From:' send-hook . 'unmy_hdr Reply-To:' send-hook

Re: folder-hook problem?

1999-02-10 Thread Christian Kurz
Dale Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using Mutt 0.95i (1998-12-12), a Linux box. Is there something wrong > with folder-hook or am I just doing it wrong. For example, I have: > folder-hook foobar set attribution="On %d, %n snarled:" > folder-hook foobar set realname="Dale the confused"

Re: folder-hook problem?

1999-02-10 Thread Stefan Troeger
Hi, On Tue, Feb 09, 1999 at 21:20 -0800, Dale Harris wrote: > I'm using Mutt 0.95i (1998-12-12), a Linux box. Is there something wrong > with folder-hook or am I just doing it wrong. For example, I have: > > folder-hook foobar set attribution="On %d, %n snarled:" > folder-hook foobar set rea

folder-hook problem?

1999-02-10 Thread Dale Harris
Hi, I'm using Mutt 0.95i (1998-12-12), a Linux box. Is there something wrong with folder-hook or am I just doing it wrong. For example, I have: folder-hook foobar set attribution="On %d, %n snarled:" folder-hook foobar set realname="Dale the confused" in my .muttrc to apply some rules when I