2000-07-09-01:10:51 Ronny Haryanto:
> [...] And for archives I don't think there's any advantage of
> using maildir over mbox, which loads faster. [...]
In the context of a discussion of the compressed folders patch, I
don't disagree with your statement, but taken in isolation I'd have
to disagre
On Sat, 08 Jul 2000, Jason Helfman wrote:
> Is their a reason to really use the gzip patch with Maildir style
> mailboxes?
The current version of the compressed folders patch does not support
Maildir yet, but only single file folder formats like mbox and mmdf.
From a pragmatic point o
On 08-Jul-2000, Jason Helfman wrote:
> Is their a reason to really use the gzip patch with Maildir style
> mailboxes? I think there is but, I'd like to know some other opinions of
> this.
The compressed folder patch should not be used on incoming folders
that receive mails. This p
Is their a reason to really use the gzip patch with Maildir style
mailboxes? I think there is but, I'd like to know some other opinions of
this.
--
/helfman
"At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus that has always
been in your possession."
Fingerprint: 2F76
