On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:08:17PM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:23:31PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > > and so i get:
> > > To: mutt-users@mutt.org, ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
> > >
> > > i don't know if the
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 04:23:31PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > and so i get:
> > To: mutt-users@mutt.org, ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
> >
> > i don't know if there is a way to un-hook a hook when one leaves a folder,
> > or rather w
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> and so i get:
> To: mutt-users@mutt.org, ycm-us...@googlegroups.com
>
> i don't know if there is a way to un-hook a hook when one leaves a folder,
> or rather when a pattern for a hook stops to evaluate TRUE.
>
> another guess, this mig
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:10:13PM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:40:24AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> > On 2014-02-03, glphvgacs wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > > > alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it her
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:40:24AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On 2014-02-03, glphvgacs wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > > alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here.
> > >
> >
> > cann't unhook from within a hook :
> > folder-h
On 2014-02-03, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here.
> >
>
> cann't unhook from within a hook :
> folder-hook . "unhook *"
>
> this has no effect, or not the effect i want it to hav
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here.
>
cann't unhook from within a hook :
folder-hook . "unhook *"
this has no effect, or not the effect i want it to have:
unhook *
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:16:50AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> > alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here.
> >
>
> cann't unhook from within a hook :
> folder-hook . "unhook *"
>
> this has no effect, or not
On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:03:36AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:37:49PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> > * glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> > > and this to hooks:
> > > folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> > > set autoedit=yes
> > > my_hdr To:'
> > >
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 07:37:49PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> * glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> > and this to hooks:
> > folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> > set autoedit=yes
> > my_hdr To:'
> > folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> > my_hdr To:mutt-users@mu
* glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> and this to hooks:
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> set autoedit=yes
> my_hdr To:'
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> my_hdr To:mutt-users@mutt.org'
By the way, you may want to check your hooks thoroughly, as a second
addres
* glphvgacs [2014-02-02 18:25 -0600]:
> now that is what i'm talking about. great stuff, thanks.
You're welcome.
> and this to hooks:
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> set autoedit=yes
> my_hdr To:'
> folder-hook to:mutt-users@mutt.org '\
> my_hdr To:mutt-users@mutt.org'
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 05:45:54PM -0600, David J. Weller-Fahy wrote:
> * glphvgacs [2014-02-02 14:28 -0600]:
> > > ++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
> > > >when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > > >'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> >
>
On 2014-02-02, glphvgacs wrote:
> when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
> header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is such
> a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me if
* glphvgacs [2014-02-02 14:28 -0600]:
> > ++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
> > >when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > >'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
>
> is there a way to add the '\n' there?
I didn't find a way to add the '\n', inst
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:46]:
> > On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > > > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > > > 'To:' hea
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 09:00:56PM +0100, Rejo Zenger wrote:
> ++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
> >when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
> >header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> >i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think ther
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:57:13PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:46]:
> > On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > > * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > > > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > > > 'To:' hea
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 03:01:41PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:54]:
> >
> > starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
> > works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you
> > need to skip the 'To:'
>
> Then list-
++ 02/02/14 14:05 -0500 - glphvgacs:
>when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
>header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
>i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is such
>a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me i
* glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:54]:
>
> starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
> works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you
> need to skip the 'To:'
Then list-reply to an existing thread, and remove the "In-Reply-To:"
header and adjust the
* glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:46]:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > > 'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> > > i don't think a folder-
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:44:58PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> How are you trying to "reply to list"? Are you using the "L" key as
> described in the fine manual?
yes. i'm not talking about _reply_, i'm talking about starting a thread.
starting a thread is the problem. to reply to a mailing list, list-reply
works just fine. but when one wants to start a thread, that's when you need
to skip the 'To:'
* glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:38]:
> On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> > * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > > 'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> > > i don't think a folder-
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > 'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> > i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think th
On Sun, Feb 02, 2014 at 02:24:19PM -0500, Patrick Shanahan wrote:
> * glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> > when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> > 'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> > i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think th
* glphvgacs [02-02-14 14:06]:
> when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the
> 'To:' header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
> i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is
> such a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me if
when starting the Mail composition in mutt, is there a way skip the 'To:'
header by filling it up based on a given pattern?
i don't think a folder-hook would do this since i don't think there is such
a thing as 'set to = ' in configuration file (correct me if i'm wrong
please). so perhaps a macro?
29 matches
Mail list logo
