On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 02:10:13PM -0500, glphvgacs wrote: > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 10:40:24AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote: > > On 2014-02-03, glphvgacs wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 03, 2014 at 11:09:42AM -0500, glphvgacs wrote: > > > > alright, i saw the unhook, let me think if and how i can use it here. > > > > > > > > > > cann't unhook from within a hook : > > > folder-hook . "unhook *" > > > > > > this has no effect, or not the effect i want it to have: > > > unhook * > > > > Sure you can. At least you can unhook specific hook types and I see > > no reason that you couldn't unhook all hooks, although that might > > kill the execution of other folder-hooks until they are redefined. > > As an example from my muttrc: > > > > folder-hook . 'unhook message-hook' > > > > Regards, > > Gary > > > > true, i don't know what i was doing earlier. it works for both folder-hook > and (*). however changing folders now happen in slow-motion. i haven't test > the effect either.
it works, but the performance is not practical. mutt struggles to change folder. note that all my maildir's are on local fs not to mention the use of notmuch.
