* David T-G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 12:45]:
> macro pager ,@r13on "set display_filter=$HOME/local/bin/rot13;macro
>pager \\cx ,@r13off 'Toggle ROT13
>decoding'\n"
> macro pager ,@r13off "set display_filter=;macro pager \\cx ,@r13on
>'Toggle ROT13 decoding'\n"
> macro pager \cx ,@r13on
At 16:00 + 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a pretty clear memory of someone producing and maintain a patch
> which enabled slang as a scripting language for mutt. I know it was
> mentioned a good few times, either here or on the developers' mailing list.
>
> Am
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
>
> > On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> >
> > > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > > programmable via slang.
> >
> > possibly - but I'v
* Thomas E. Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 10:28:35 -0500]:
> On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
>
> > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > programmable via slang.
>
> possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could be
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Thomas E. Dickey wrote:
> > I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made mutt
> > programmable via slang.
>
> possibly - but I've only seen it mentioned as a possibility that could
> be developed rather than an accomplished fact.
speaking of which (sin
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002, Dave Pearson wrote:
> * Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
>
> > * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 16:49]:
> >
> > > [SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
> >
> > [SNIP Sven swears in public]
> >
> > Sven [slang, anyone?]
>
> I seem
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 23:13:28 +0100]:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 16:49]:
>
> > [SNIP scripting in mutt would be nice]
>
> [SNIP Sven swears in public]
>
> Sven [slang, anyone?]
I seem to remember that someone does/did maintain a patch that made
Quoting Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Mar 22, 2002 06:20]:
> * Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
> > Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
> >
> > source "shell-cmd |"
> >
> > Wouldn't:
> >
> > macro foo :source "shell-cmd|"
> >
>
Rocco, et al --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote:
% > ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
% > %
% > % define ''
...
% > (pager, index, compose, ...) to set the scope of the command, how are the
% > two at all diff
* Cameron Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-22 12:24:10 +1100]:
> Someone has already mentioned his startup file being:
>
> source "shell-cmd |"
>
> Wouldn't:
>
> macro foo :source "shell-cmd|"
>
> be general enough to go most algorithmic things without bloating
> mutt? The she
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 10:56:43:AM -0600 Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
> scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
Yepp.
> Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
It would
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 07:25:50:AM -0500 David T-G wrote:
> ...and then Rocco Rutte said...
> % There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
> % own commands. Something like:
> %
> % define ''
> % define ''
> %
> % in my .muttrc to bind to keys instea
begin quoting what Michael Elkins said on Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:25:46PM -0800:
> This converstion comes up every once in a while and devolves into "my
> programming language is better than yours" ultimately.
Just put an INTERCAL interpreter in there.
Or, better yet, befunge. Then you can say
Sven Guckes wrote:
> * Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 16:49]:
> > Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
> > scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
> > Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
>
* Jeremy Blosser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-03-21 16:49]:
> Anyway, this is probably just one more place where a real internal
> scripting backend with variables and loops, etc., would be nice to have.
> Everyone knows it, but no one is up to the work yet it seems. ;)
LISP.
There - I've said it.
Rocco --
...and then Rocco Rutte said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:11:22:PM -0700 Steve Talley wrote:
%
% There's only one thing I really miss: I'd like to be abled to define my
% own commands. Something like:
%
% define ''
% define ''
%
% in my .muttrc to
16 matches
Mail list logo
