Re: Revisiting: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-06-28 Thread lhecking
> > I presume mutt needs multipart/signed. > > Sounds like a reasonable guess. I don't suppose you could send in a > message that has been mangled this way? It would make it easier to > test. I'm attaching a tgz archive with both versions, most of the headers stripped that are not relevant to

Re: Revisiting: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-06-25 Thread Brendan Cully
On Friday, 24 June 2011 at 00:00, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > I am facing the same problem now, but may have a bit more information. > > Original message has a multipart/signed structure with a qp text and > a signature part, all of which is wrapped into a multipart/mixed > structure, presuma

Re: Revisiting: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-06-23 Thread Lars Hecking
> I am facing the same problem now, but may have a bit more information. Original message has a multipart/signed structure with a qp text and a signature part, all of which is wrapped into a multipart/mixed structure, presumably done by the list server for the purpose of adding a (text, 7-

Revisiting: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-06-22 Thread Lars Hecking
There was a thread on this mailing list back in March, http://marc.info/?l=mutt-users&m=130016436305546&w=2 List: mutt-users Subject:application/pgp-signature is unsupported From: Joseph < xxx () gmail ! com> Date: 2011-03-15 4:44:57 which doesn'

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread Joseph
On 03/15/11 16:21, Derek Martin wrote: On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:09:15AM -0600, Joseph wrote: I tried all combinations: set crypt_verify_sig=ask-no set crypt_verify_sig=ask-yes set crypt_verify_sig=yes Makes no difference, I always get [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use '

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread Derek Martin
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 10:09:15AM -0600, Joseph wrote: > I tried all combinations: > set crypt_verify_sig=ask-no > set crypt_verify_sig=ask-yes > set crypt_verify_sig=yes > > Makes no difference, I always get [-- application/pgp-signature is > unsupported (use 'v'

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread Joseph
always get [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] -- Joseph

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-15 Thread David Champion
* On 15 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote: > The addition in mailcap I just added in, but it makes no difference. > I know before it used to ask me if I want to view the signature but some how > it doesn't any more. What is the value of $pgp_verify_sig? What you describe sounds like it used to be ask-yes

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-14 Thread Joseph
On 03/15/11 00:23, David Champion wrote: * On 14 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote: I'm missing a setting I think. When I open gpg signed message I get: application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view ... mutt pgp setting: # automatically verify the sign of a message

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-14 Thread David Champion
* On 14 Mar 2011, Joseph wrote: > I'm missing a setting I think. > When I open gpg signed message I get: > > application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view ... > > mutt pgp setting: > # automatically verify the sign of a message when opened >

application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2011-03-14 Thread Joseph
I'm missing a setting I think. When I open gpg signed message I get: application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view ... mutt pgp setting: # automatically verify the sign of a message when opened set crypt_verify_sig=yes mailcap application/pgp-signature; gpg %s Wh

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2000-09-10 Thread Jason Helfman
ithout pgp support. | | On 2000-09-10 00:20:37 -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: | > Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 00:20:37 -0700 | > From: Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > To: MUTT Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > Subject: application/pgp-signature is unsupported | > Mail-Followup

Re: application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2000-09-10 Thread Thomas Roessler
Your version of mutt seems to have been compiled without pgp support. On 2000-09-10 00:20:37 -0700, Jason Helfman wrote: > Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2000 00:20:37 -0700 > From: Jason Helfman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: MUTT Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: application/pgp-

application/pgp-signature is unsupported

2000-09-10 Thread Jason Helfman
I'm confused. [-- Attachment #2 --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Encoding: 7bit, Size: 0.2K --] [-- application/pgp-signature is unsupported (use 'v' to view this part) --] -- /Jason G Helfman "At any given moment, you may find the ticket to the circus tha