Charles Curley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 03 Apr 2000:
> -> Others have noted this has been around forever, I will add that you should
> -> also see the $alternates variable, as reverse_name is useless without it.
>
> OK, having gotten this far, how do you set it up? I experimented and cam
On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 11:41:53AM -0600, Charles Curley muttered:
-> On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:29:01PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser muttered:
-> -> Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
-> -> > Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-> -> > > Is it possible to look at the original To: of the messa
On Wed, Jan 26, 2000 at 04:29:01PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser muttered:
-> Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
-> > Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-> > > Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
-> > > to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
> > to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents of that.
> >
> > This would be nice since it is pretty common to have more th
On 2000-01-26 13:25:33 +, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> See reverse_name in the latest mutt. Unfortunately this isn't in
> mutt-1.0, I think.
Reverse_name is a pretty old feature, and certainly present in
stable.
However, it's more useful together with the new versions' "from"
variable.
--
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 26 Jan 2000:
> This must surely be the second most frequently asked question (after
> the one about hooks having a permanent effect unless you also have a
> default hook to reset the state).
Indeed. :-)
> See reverse_name in the latest mutt.
Jimmy Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
> to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents of that.
>
> This would be nice since it is pretty common to have more than one
> email-address, and it is IMHO better to have t
Is it possible to look at the original To: of the message which I wan't
to reply to, and execute commands based on the contents of that.
This would be nice since it is pretty common to have more than one
email-address, and it is IMHO better to have the address which they wrote
to as From in the r
