Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-06 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Friday, September 4 at 09:49 PM, quoth Chris G: >Depending on what/who created the maildir hierarchy you may >find it virtually impossible to move directories (which aren't >real directories) and mailboxes around. [snip]

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Friday, September 4 at 04:43 PM, quoth Thomas Baker: > I frequently edit entire threads in order to circulate their > contents -- with redundant quotes and attachments removed and > headers pruned -- as digests. I wouldn't know how to do that

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Chris G
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:09:56PM -0400, Dave Dodge wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:27:09PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > > anyway when does one want to edit messages, it's not something I've > > ever wanted to do. > > I used to have the same opinion before I had a mailer that made it so > easy. W

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Chris G
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 01:15:58PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Friday, September 4 at 06:27 PM, quoth Chris G: > - reading/writing/moving/deleting messages is faster than opening > an mbox, looking for the right message, editing it, then > rewriting the whole mbox. > > >>

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Thomas Baker
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:09:56PM -0400, Dave Dodge wrote: > > anyway when does one want to edit messages, it's not something I've > > ever wanted to do. > > I used to have the same opinion before I had a mailer that made it so > easy. With mutt I do occasionally edit messages: > > - to use a

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Friday, September 4 at 04:09 PM, quoth Dave Dodge: > - to remove uneeded attachments when archiving a discussion thread. >For example a co-worker produces some software my own project >depends on, and has lately been mailing me prereleas

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Dave Dodge
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 06:27:09PM +0100, Chris G wrote: > anyway when does one want to edit messages, it's not something I've > ever wanted to do. I used to have the same opinion before I had a mailer that made it so easy. With mutt I do occasionally edit messages: - to use a message in my in

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Thomas Baker
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 11:41:48AM -0700, George Davidovich wrote: > The mbox format does have advantages but there can be as many > disadvantages. The general consensus here seems to be to rely on mbox > for archives and use maildir (by default) for everything else. Well, I'm quite used to mbox

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread George Davidovich
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 02:07:50PM -0400, Thomas Baker wrote: > On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:22:47PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > > > I can move email files around just like any another > > > data .doc or .xls files, and I can archive the email for a > > > project together with all the other data files

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Friday, September 4 at 06:27 PM, quoth Chris G: - reading/writing/moving/deleting messages is faster than opening an mbox, looking for the right message, editing it, then rewriting the whole mbox. >>> Possibly faster for a *

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Thomas Baker
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:22:47PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > > I can move email files around just like any another > > data .doc or .xls files, and I can archive the email for a > > project together with all the other data files. > > You might want to consider switching to Maildir. > > Maildir u

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Chris G
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:08:45PM -0500, Kyle Wheeler wrote: > On Friday, September 4 at 05:32 PM, quoth Chris G: > >> The advantages are: > >> > >> - reading/writing/moving/deleting messages is faster than opening an > >> mbox, looking for the right message, editing it, then > >> rewriting

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Kyle Wheeler
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Friday, September 4 at 05:32 PM, quoth Chris G: >> The advantages are: >> >> - reading/writing/moving/deleting messages is faster than opening an >> mbox, looking for the right message, editing it, then >> rewriting the whole mbox. >> > Pos

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Chris G
On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 12:22:47PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote: > On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 10:27:20PM -0400, Thomas Baker wrote: > > If I am reading an important thread in mutt and need to put that > > thread into my to-do list, I save it as a file, e.g.: > > > > 2009-09-03.mutt-rxvt-configuration.

Re: The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-04 Thread Dan Ritter
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 10:27:20PM -0400, Thomas Baker wrote: > If I am reading an important thread in mutt and need to put that > thread into my to-do list, I save it as a file, e.g.: > > 2009-09-03.mutt-rxvt-configuration.mbox > > I run a shell script to add a reference to that file to the

The MBOX file paradigm

2009-09-03 Thread Thomas Baker
On Thu, Sep 03, 2009 at 03:02:47PM -0700, George Davidovich wrote: > > So that when I clicked on a link such as: > > > > > > Foobar > > > > > > in Firefox, it woul