On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 10:32:14AM -0400, Mason Loring Bliss wrote:
> It seems like a win, so I'm assuming its lack of inclusion is intentional,
> and I'm wondering about the intent.
And then I deleted the content of a large mailbox, and server-side delete-
to-trash processing started looking a l
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In your version, tabs are missing beetween the filenames and the dates.
> >
> > Where did you get it? Or, more important, how did you fetch it? Sure
> > enough, a check of the PGP signature should fail.
> I got it from http://cedricduval.free.fr/downlo
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 12:05:22AM +0200, Cedric Duval wrote..
> Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I thought I'd give the trash patch a try, but being inexperienced with
> > command line patches, I've run into the following error, although I
> > thought I had the right syntax
I mumbled:
> > Any tips would be appreciated.
> % wget http://cedricduval.free.fr/download/mutt/patch-1.4.0.cd.edit_threads.9.2
> % wget
>http://cedricduval.free.fr/download/mutt/sign/patch-1.4.0.cd.edit_threads.9.2.asc
> % gpg --verify patch-1.4.0.cd.edit_threads.9.2.asc && cd mutt-1.4 && \
Kevin Coyner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought I'd give the trash patch a try, but being inexperienced with
> command line patches, I've run into the following error, although I
> thought I had the right syntax
> [kosuke@sumida mutt-1.4]$ patch -p1 < patch-1.4.trash.txt
The command is
