On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 02:03:52PM +0100, Christopher Zimmermann wrote:
> when displaying a mailbox index in threaded view, the different threads are
> sorted by the date of their oldest message. Is there a way to sort them by
> their newest message?
Yes, set $sort_aux to last-date-received.
--
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 11:58:09PM -0700, John Iverson wrote:
> * On Fri, 05 Jul 2002, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Jul 2002, Raoul Bönisch wrote:
> >
> > > The setting "set sort=subject" should have no effect because it is
> > > overwritten by "set sort=threads". Or am I wrong here?
[...]
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 06:15:38AM +0200, Oliver Fuchs wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Jul 2002, Deb wrote:
>
> > But when I use mutt to read email, messages are not sorted by threads by
> > default. I have to go to options (o) and then sort by threads (t), which
> > then gives me the display that I want.
>
* Nicolas Rachinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-04 09:16:25 +0200]:
> Do you have any hooks which change $sort?
> What's the output of ":set ?sort\n"?
Ah, found it... I was sourcing a file that escaped me on the
first 2 go-throughs, and resetting sort to "date-sent".
Whew! Thanks for the help
* Deb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-03 22:37 -0700]:
> * Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-04 06:15:38 +0200]:
>
> > set sort=subject
> > set sort=threads# sorting the mails in threads
> > set sort_aux=date # sorting the threads
> >
> > ... that works for me
>
> Nope, didn't work.
* Oliver Fuchs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-07-04 06:15:38 +0200]:
> set sort=subject
> set sort=threads # sorting the mails in threads
> set sort_aux=date # sorting the threads
>
> ... that works for me
Nope, didn't work. Must be something else.
Thanks anyway,
deb
--
"If it dies,
On Wed, 03 Jul 2002, Deb wrote:
> But when I use mutt to read email, messages are not sorted by threads by
> default. I have to go to options (o) and then sort by threads (t), which
> then gives me the display that I want.
Hi,
try
set sort=subject
set sort=threads# sorting the mails in
Well I found that it is to:
folder-hook mutt "push V"
folder-hook lugs "push V"
Is this wrong?
It is still not working, and I've had it working before.
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 08:16:03PM +0100, Michael Tatge muttered:
| Hi Jason!
|
| Jason Helfman muttered:
| > On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:44
Well it is sorting by threads, but I remember that it was a collaped
thread before, whereas not, it is not. Am I being unclear about all
this, or am I looking at a wrong option here ?
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 08:16:03PM +0100, Michael Tatge muttered:
| Hi Jason!
|
| Jason Helfman muttered:
| > On
Hi Jason!
Jason Helfman muttered:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:44:44PM +0100, Michael Tatge muttered:
> | Jason Helfman muttered:
> | > For some reason, not quiet sure why, I am unable to sort by threads...
> |
> | > set sort_aux
> |
> |
> | There's missing a value since $sort_au
I removed that option, and still same result.
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:44:44PM +0100, Michael Tatge muttered:
| Jason Helfman muttered:
| > For some reason, not quiet sure why, I am unable to sort by threads...
|
| > set sort_aux
|
|
| There's missing a value since $sort_aux is
Jason Helfman muttered:
> For some reason, not quiet sure why, I am unable to sort by threads...
> set sort_aux
There's missing a value since $sort_aux is not boolean.
HTH,
Michael
--
I've run DOOM more in the last few days than I have the last few
months. I just love debuggin
12 matches
Mail list logo
