Hi,
* Jörg Sommer wrote:
Corsair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So there's no way to do it (without a external mail filter) when mails
from mailing lists and other mails are mixed in a folder?
From /usr/share/doc/mutt/manual.txt.gz:
12. Using Multiple spool mailboxes
Usage: mbox-hook [
Hallo Corsair,
Corsair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:31:41PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
>> If you want to move read mail to ~/read-mail and ~/read-lists, you can do
>> something like this:
>>
>> folder-hook . 'set mbox=~/read-mail'
>> folder-hook =lists 'set mbox=~/re
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 04:55:21PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
>
> If they're in one folder, there're two more options. 1) You use a macro to
> move messages or 2) use folder-hooks that move messages when you enter the
> folder.
>
> For 1) you'd need to hit a single key, 2) would be automatic but h
Hi,
* Corsair wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:31:41PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
If you want to move read mail to ~/read-mail and ~/read-lists, you can do
something like this:
folder-hook . 'set mbox=~/read-mail'
folder-hook =lists 'set mbox=~/read-lists'
The first makes sure that f
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 01:31:41PM +0100, Rocco Rutte wrote:
>
> Your mixing up two different concepts: 1) $mbox is an archive for read mail
> and 2) save-hook let's you tune what folder mutt suggests when you ask it
> to save a message (hit 's').
Sorry... It's just that one of my mailbox is nam
Hi,
* Corsair wrote:
And of course, I do have subscribed some mailing lists in the .muttrc.
But the save-hook above seems not to work. When I change mailbox from
the spool or quit Mutt, all read mails just move to "mbox". How
should I setup Mutt so that mails from mailing lists automatically
* Gregor Zattler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-08-16 17:42]:
> i would be perfectly satisfied if i could see a dump
> of hooks, so i can debug my configuration. That's all.
> I don't even think such a menu would be very useful:
> Hooks are for automated mail handling, so there is not
> much sense in s
* Adam Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-06-05 19:25]:
> Actually, I've discovered that it is possible to set up a save-hook
> with a "To:" (or any header) match, using a pattern. Something like:
>
> save-hook "~h mutt-users@\\.mutt\\.org" =mutt-users
>
> This works great! Combined with tagging t
On Tue, May 14, 2002 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Martin Karlsson wrote:
> Hmm. I'm not sure it works that way. Look for something specific in
> the mail (just like when writing a procmail recipe). I have:
>
> save-hook "~h owner-mutt-users" +s.mutt-users
> save-hook "(~f pal1|~f pal2)" +s.pal1_and_2
>
* Sven Guckes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [05/14/02 06:02]:
> * munk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 23:14]:
> > I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command
> > to work properly in my .muttrc file.
> > The current settings I have look as follows:
> >
> > save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
> > sav
* munk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-14 00.12 +0100]:
> Hi,
Hello!
> I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command to work properly in my .muttrc
>file.
>
> The current settings I have look as follows:
>
> save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
> save-hook bugtraq +bugtraq-list
Hmm
* munk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-05-13 23:14]:
> I'm having trouble getting the 'save-hook' command
> to work properly in my .muttrc file.
> The current settings I have look as follows:
>
> save-hook mutt +mutt-users-list
> save-hook bugtraq +bugtraq-list
>
> but whenever I press 's' to save
Lawrence Mitchell [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> fcc-hook '~t mutt-users' =muttsent
> the fcc-save-hook is if you want the save-hook and the fcchook to be the same
> for a particular pattern, saves on typing. That might be your problem.
> hope that helps
thanks, I'll give it try.
* On [010508 06:29] Dale Morris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]But I'm having a hard time
> getting mutt to put a copy of the message *I've sent* to the
> list in my =out mailbox. Here's what I have in my .muttrc
> thus far:
>
> save-hook '~C mutt-users' =support
> fcc-save-hook '~C mutt-user
On Sat, Mar 24, 2001 at 12:14:55AM -0800, Gary Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:56:41PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote:
> > I have the following that doesn't work:
> >
> > folder-hook "IN.mutt" 'save-hook * =mutt'
> >
> > When I'm reading "IN.mutt" and go to save a message, "IN.mutt" kee
On Fri, Mar 23, 2001 at 05:56:41PM -0700, Duke Normandin wrote:
> I have the following that doesn't work:
>
> folder-hook "IN.mutt" 'save-hook * =mutt'
>
> When I'm reading "IN.mutt" and go to save a message, "IN.mutt" keeps
> coming up as the default for that folder. Any ideas? Tia..
I see a c
yes, i have considered prcomail and other such filtering, but i would like the mail to
stay in my inbox, and when i have read it, i like to hit "s" ""...lazy and
quick...
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:00:23PM -0500, John P. Verel wrote:
> On 01/12/01, 10:27:19PM -0500, Okan Demirmen - mutt wrote:
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2000:
> Is there a way to do something similar to save-hook, but use an expression
> similar to the one used in tagging? Something like "~h owner-freebsd-bugs"
> or "~s BUGTRAQ"?
Did you actually try this? I think
save-hook "~s BUGTRAQ"
> Is there a way to do something similar to save-hook, but
use an expression
> similar to the one used in tagging? Something like "~h
owner-freebsd-bugs"
> or "~s BUGTRAQ"?
Yeah - it's called 'procmail'.
-suresh
Interestingly enough all of these work.
I don't remember where I got the syntax from.
save-hook ~t\\SECURITYPORTAL =security_portal
save-hook ~t\\science-text =tips
save-hook ~t\\science-html =tips
save-hook ~s\\H-GEN =humbug
save-hook ~s\\H-CHAT =humbug
save-hook ~s\\H-ANNOUNCE =humbug
save-hook
Darrin Mison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 21 Oct 2000:
> I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
>
> save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
It's supposed to be:
save-hook '~s fm-news' =freshmeat_list
Or at least, that's how I'd write it. :-)
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänni
Darrin Mison muttered:
> I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
>
> save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
^^
This would refer to a litaral '\' which is not in the header you
quoted.
> Subject: [fm-news] newsletter for Friday, October 20th
Try save-hook '~s fm-
Darrin --
...and then Darrin Mison said...
% I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
%
% save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
What's with the \\ in your expression? It seems to me that that will
match the literal expression
\fm-news
which doesn't seem to be in the head
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 03:00:09PM +1000, Darrin Mison wrote:
> I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
>
> save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
>
> >Subject: [fm-news] newsletter for Friday, October 20th
Maybe because there is no '\fm-news' in the subject. Be careful with
b
On Saturday, 21 October 2000 at 15:00, Darrin Mison wrote:
> I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
>
> save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
>
> Mutt refuses to save in the mbox 'freshmeat_list' but instead only 'noreply'
> Message headers below...
what are your other save
On Sat, Oct 21, 2000 at 03:00:09PM +1000, Darrin Mison wrote:
>I can't figure out for the life of me why this doesn't work
>
>save-hook ~s\\fm-news =freshmeat_list
>
>Mutt refuses to save in the mbox 'freshmeat_list' but instead only 'noreply'
>Message headers below...
>
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
Dean Luick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 14 Sep 2000:
> Save to mailbox ('?' for list): =work
>
> This is what I'm expecting. However, when I hit return to actually save,
> the line clears and nothing happens -- as if I aborted the save.
> Yet when I hit -J instead of return, it accept
Hardy Merrill muttered:
> My muttrc has this format for the "index_format"
>
> set index_format="%3C%?M?+& ?%Z %[%b %d] %-16.16F [%-9.9O] %-33.33s (%4l)"
> I screwed something up - I've reworked a few things including
> adding $alternates for my email addresses, and now my save-hook's
> don't wo
Hardy Merrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 19 Jul 2000:
> Here is my mutt-users save-hook:
>
> save-hook mutt-users =Mutt-users
This won't work, because if you don't supply a regexp with a Mutt
pattern operator, the $default_hook gets used -- which will match
the given pattern agains the Fr
On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 08:35:01PM -0700, jon rust wrote:
> I've got
>
> save-hook =customer.in =archived/customer
>
> in my dot-muttrc file. However, when I press 's' while reading a message,
> or while in the folder index (in customer.in) it guesses at the save file
> name (based on the Fr
jon rust muttered:
> save-hook =customer.in =archived/customer
>
> However, when I press 's' while reading a message,
> or while in the folder index (in customer.in) it guesses at the save file
> name (based on the From: address). What am I missing?
In memory of the recent discussion on this
Adahma --
...and then Adahma said...
% Would it be possible to setup a save-hook that would open the
% browser in a specific subdirectory so that I could easily the right
% mailbox?
It sounds like what you want is a macro, but perhaps you might want a
save-hook that changes the directory based o
Adahma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 08 Jun 2000:
> Would it be possible to setup a save-hook that would open the
> browser in a specific subdirectory so that I could easily the right
> mailbox?
I just tried this:
save-hook "~f adahma" +foo
... and created the directory ~/Mail/foo
When I
Sergei Gerasenko muttered:
>
> save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +test
>
> This is supposed to move all read mail coming from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my email address) to "test".
>
> The above hook is the only save-hook in the muttrc right now. So,
> there shouldn't be any conflict there. I also have a c
Sergei Gerasenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Wed, 31 May 2000:
> As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing
> messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done
> according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my computer
> whether
On Wed, May 31, 2000 at 01:03:51PM -0400, Sergei Gerasenko wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> As I understand the concept of save-hooks, they are intended for routing
> messages to various places after they have been read. The routing is done
> according to some rules. Now, none of that is happening on my
Sergei --
...and then Sergei Gerasenko said...
% Hi guys,
%
% I recently unsubscribed from the list because I was overwhelmed by the
% amount of mail I was getting. I'm now going to use procmail. Anyway, the
Welcome back :-)
% question I have is probably trivial for most of you. I've tried to
> perfectly happy with it. One thing is strange to me: I've got some lists
> defined so I can save messages to default folders. This works for all of them
> except for the mutt-users list! Here's a part of my .muttrc:
>
> save-hook [EMAIL PROTECTED] +mutt-users
The list is hosted at mutt.org, s
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 09:48:08AM -0600, freix wrote:
> issue: One of the mailing lists I'm on has two domains
> merit.edu
> nanog.org
>
> i have
>
> save-hook "~C nanog@(nanog|merit)\.(edu|org)" +nanog
>
> as the epxression, and when i start mutt it says:
> Error in /home/freix/.muttrc, lin
This was discussed on one list last week, and it should work if you add
an extra set of quotes:
save-hook '~C "nanog@(nanog|merit)\.(edu|org)"' +nanog
randy
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 09:48:08AM -0600, freix wrote:
> Heya muttsters-
>
> side note it seems every day i find a new facet to mutt,
Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 10 Feb 2000:
> save-hook "~C 'nanog@(nanog\.org|merit\.edu)'" +nanog
>
> (BTW it's easy to get lost in various ways of quoting. I'm not sure if
> `\.' shouldn't be replaced to `\\.' in this case.
It probably should; but if you switch the ' and "
A.V. Jayanthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> My question here is that, what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press
> 's' to save a mail received from this mailing list, it should
> automatically show =mutt, the folder into which I save all these
> mails.
save-hook '~C mutt-users' +mutt-us
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 01:15:01AM +0530, A.V. Jayanthan wrote:
:
: I subscribe to this mailing list. I receive mails from all
:those who send mail to this mailing list. My question here is that,
:what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail
:received from this mailing lis
A.V. Jayanthan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Thu, 10 Feb 2000:
> what do I do in .muttrc so that when I press 's' to save a mail
> received from this mailing list, it should automatically show =mutt,
> the folder into which I save all these mails.
Either:
save-hook "~C mutt-users@" =mutt
...fo
Stewart V. Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>fcc-save-hook ~A +People/%O.gz
>
> However, recently one of my correspondents has had their email name
> changed to all capitals, so now rather than being saved in
>People/personx.gz
> mutt wants to create
>People/PERSONX.gz
S
Hello!
You seem to be using the compressed folders patch?
I'll look into it.
Quoting r. Stewart V. Wright ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) "Save-hook question":
> Hi all,
> ...
> As a second question - how can I convince mutt that there is new mail
> in compressed folders? I have procmail deliver some mail
Mark J. Bynum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ever since I upgraded to development version 1.1.1i I can't seem to get my
> save-hook to work right.
List processing has changed on Mutt 1.1.
> fcc-save-hook ~l ~/Mail/lists/%B
> fcc-save-hook '~l' ~/Mail/lists/%B
> fcc-save-hook '~l' =/lists/%B
The
> or if you used double-quotes,
>
> macro index"T~s [LUG];s=lug"
That sort of thing - it's not specific to mutt at all - really annoys
me. Sometimes I wonder whether life would be easier if the escape
character weren't represented by escaping the escape character itself.
For exam
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>T~s \[LUG\];s=lug
>
> [...] You need to escape the square brackets or Mutt will interpret
> that as "any character of L, U or G". [...]
Since you mentioned backslashes, I feel the need to point out that you
can easily get in trouble with them, si
Timothy Ball <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Tue, 19 Oct 1999:
> Is there away to grep thru the "Subject" field in mutt so if I have a
> message w/ [LUG] in the subject I can save it to my =lug mail box?
T~s \[LUG\];s=lug
Description: tag all matching messages with the tag-pattern function
(bound t
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> btw which manual do you using ? http://www.mutt.org/doc/manual/ ?
I use the manual that comes with Mutt: /opt/mutt/doc/mutt/manual.txt.
It might be /usr/local/lib/mutt/manual.txt on your system, or wherever.
--
David DeSimone |
David DeSimone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The problem here is that the default behaviour for mutt for the save
> > command (using the user's username from the email address) can not be
> > re-established in any way once you have specified a def
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Sep 1999:
> save-hook . =%O
Without trying that out, if it works, it's exactly what I was after.
Thanks. :)
Mikko
--
// Mikko Hänninen, aka. Wizzu // [EMAIL PROTECTED] // http://www.iki.fi/wiz/
// The Corrs list maintainer // net.f
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The problem here is that the default behaviour for mutt for the save
> command (using the user's username from the email address) can not be
> re-established in any way once you have specified a default save-hook
> (save-hook . +folder, or using ~A, o
David DeSimone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27 Sep 1999:
> For instance, perhaps I am reading mail in my mutt-users folder. Then
> something jogs my memory, and I realize I need to send mail to my friend
> Joe. Are you saying that, just because I am viewing mail in my
> mutt-users folder, t
Mikko Hänninen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've asked this before. Since nobody has answered, I think it means
> it can't be done. Once you've established a default save hook, you
> can't get rid of it, you can only change it (?).
I think that's right.
> The proper solution would probably b
Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Mon, 27
Sep 1999:
> yes, this is simple, but I want to keep "default" behavior, which is save mail to
> folder with name "=from.who".
I've asked this before. Since nobody has answered, I think it means
it can't be done. Once you've
Staffan Hamala ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
> On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote:
>
> > I define one save-hook (folder-hook +work 'save-hook .* =work-done') and when I
> > change to another mailbox save-hook is still =work-done. I find, that I can
>
> You have to set a d
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Martin Keseg - Sun Slovakia - SE wrote:
> I define one save-hook (folder-hook +work 'save-hook .* =work-done') and when I
> change to another mailbox save-hook is still =work-done. I find, that I can
You have to set a default for mutt to change back after you've visited a
fo
At 10:40 PM EDT on September 24 Mikko Hänninen sent off:
> Derek Quinn Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 24 Sep 1999:
> > would like to, in cases like this, match the To: field and specify the
> > save box that way. There are a lot of situations where this would be
> > nice to have so i fig
Derek Quinn Wyatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Fri, 24 Sep 1999:
> would like to, in cases like this, match the To: field and specify the
> save box that way. There are a lot of situations where this would be
> nice to have so i figure it's got to be possible.
How about something like...
save
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:31:16AM +0100, Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS wrote:
> > > Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
> > >
> >
> > note:
> > If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
> > then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
> > in the exim doc...Actual
Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS dijo:
> Axel Tillequin:
>
> > > Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
> > >
> >
> > note:
> > If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
> > then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
> > in the exim doc...Actually you will just have t
Axel Tillequin:
> > Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
> >
>
> note:
> If your MTA is exim (much simpler and as powerfull as sendmail)
> then Procmail is not necessary. Look for "filtering mail"
> in the exim doc...Actually you will just have to write a .forward file
> with some special
>
Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I have installed procmail and already removed it. I do not like the way
> it works. I think that save-hook is much more flexible. An, up to now, it
> works fine.
If you want to sort mail as it arrives, you *cannot* use save-hooks to do
it. Mutt does no
On Mon, Sep 13, 1999 at 10:28:20AM +0100, Mr.Axel Tillequin wrote:
I have installed procmail and already removed it. I do not like the way it works. I
think that save-hook is much more flexible. An, up to now, it works fine.
Marco
> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> >
> > Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTE
Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> > I' desperately trying to better configure my mutt but I'm having problem
> > with the hooks. I need that all mail coming from BUGTRAQ and from some
> > other mailing list is stored in a separate file than inbox.
>
> Mutt do
Cross fingers, I might have this roughly right. Be gentle :)
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 12:12:44AM +0200 or thereabouts, Marco Giardini wrote:
> I' desperately trying to better configure my mutt but I'm having problem
> with the hooks. I need that all mail coming from BUGTRAQ and from some other
>
Marco Giardini [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I' desperately trying to better configure my mutt but I'm having problem
> with the hooks. I need that all mail coming from BUGTRAQ and from some
> other mailing list is stored in a separate file than inbox.
Mutt doesn't filter mail. Try procmail.
>
69 matches
Mail list logo
