Re: quoting in folder-hook

2002-04-22 Thread David T-G
Volker -- ...and then Volker Kuhlmann said... % ... % > 3.5. Setting variables based upon mailbox % > folder-hook [!]regexp command % > % > it says "command" - so this is *one* parameter % % I am sorry but IMHO that is rather far fetched. Other commands in mutt % don't need quoting, which

Re: quoting in folder-hook

2002-04-22 Thread Michael Tatge
Volker Kuhlmann ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) muttered: > Sven, thanks for explaining again that the command argument to > folder-hook must be quoted in its entirety, but that was not the point. > > > please read the manual carefully: > > > > 3.5. Setting variables based upon mailbox > > folder-hook

Re: quoting in folder-hook

2002-04-22 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
Sven, thanks for explaining again that the command argument to folder-hook must be quoted in its entirety, but that was not the point. > please read the manual carefully: > > 3.5. Setting variables based upon mailbox > folder-hook [!]regexp command > > it says "command" - so this is *one*

Re: quoting in folder-hook - command is *one* parameter

2002-04-20 Thread Sven Guckes
* Volker Kuhlmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002-04-20 23:26]: > > > folder-hook ".*-List" set sendmail="/usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -oi" > > Well, the value of sendmail *was* quoted when the folder-hook command > > was parsed, but that operation stripped off the first layer of quotes, > A!! OK, that m